Adaptation and Validation of the Hamburg Quality of Life Questionnaire in Multiple Sclerosis (HAQUAMS) for Use in Iranian Patients.

Q3 Medicine Acta neurologica Taiwanica Pub Date : 2022-01-25
Sajjad Rezaei, Alia Saberi, Hamidreza Hatamian, AmirReza Ghayeghran, Zahra Khaksari, Fatemeh Mollahosein
{"title":"Adaptation and Validation of the Hamburg Quality of Life Questionnaire in Multiple Sclerosis (HAQUAMS) for Use in Iranian Patients.","authors":"Sajjad Rezaei,&nbsp;Alia Saberi,&nbsp;Hamidreza Hatamian,&nbsp;AmirReza Ghayeghran,&nbsp;Zahra Khaksari,&nbsp;Fatemeh Mollahosein","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Quality of life (QoL) is considered as an important criterion for therapeutic effectiveness. Therefore, the present study aimed to validate the Persian version of the Hamburg Quality of Life Questionnaire in Multiple Sclerosis (HAQUAMS) for use in Iranian people with MS.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In a cross-sectional study, 158 people with MS were selected through the census sampling method. The construct validity of the Persian version of HAQUAMS was first evaluated by a confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) in AMOS-22 software, and then the internal consistency reliability and the item-total score correlations were calculated for each subscale by the SPSS-22.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The CFA and output results indicated that the HAQUAMS with a five-factor structure among the Iranian MS patients had a good construct validity if an item was eliminated and a number of covariance errors between items were released (RMSEA is euqal to 0.069). The internal consistency of HAQUAMS subscales was acceptable to excellent (alpha is euqal to 0.81 to 0.91). The analysis of item-total score correlation for determining the construct validity of HAQUAMS indicated that all items of the questionnaire had a moderate to strong positive correlation with their subscales (P less than 0.0001, r is euqal to 0.41 to 0.89). The correlation of total scores of HAQUAMS and the Beck Depression Inventory-short form (BDI-13) was equal to 0.74 (P less than 0.0001), indicating good concurrent criterion validity.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The Persian version of the HAQUAMS with a five-factor construct had acceptable validity and reliability and could be used for measurement of the health related QoL in Iranian people with MS.</p>","PeriodicalId":7102,"journal":{"name":"Acta neurologica Taiwanica","volume":"31(1) ","pages":"24-35"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta neurologica Taiwanica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Quality of life (QoL) is considered as an important criterion for therapeutic effectiveness. Therefore, the present study aimed to validate the Persian version of the Hamburg Quality of Life Questionnaire in Multiple Sclerosis (HAQUAMS) for use in Iranian people with MS.

Methods: In a cross-sectional study, 158 people with MS were selected through the census sampling method. The construct validity of the Persian version of HAQUAMS was first evaluated by a confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) in AMOS-22 software, and then the internal consistency reliability and the item-total score correlations were calculated for each subscale by the SPSS-22.

Results: The CFA and output results indicated that the HAQUAMS with a five-factor structure among the Iranian MS patients had a good construct validity if an item was eliminated and a number of covariance errors between items were released (RMSEA is euqal to 0.069). The internal consistency of HAQUAMS subscales was acceptable to excellent (alpha is euqal to 0.81 to 0.91). The analysis of item-total score correlation for determining the construct validity of HAQUAMS indicated that all items of the questionnaire had a moderate to strong positive correlation with their subscales (P less than 0.0001, r is euqal to 0.41 to 0.89). The correlation of total scores of HAQUAMS and the Beck Depression Inventory-short form (BDI-13) was equal to 0.74 (P less than 0.0001), indicating good concurrent criterion validity.

Conclusion: The Persian version of the HAQUAMS with a five-factor construct had acceptable validity and reliability and could be used for measurement of the health related QoL in Iranian people with MS.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
汉堡多发性硬化症生活质量问卷(HAQUAMS)在伊朗患者中的适用性和有效性
目的:生活质量(QoL)被认为是衡量治疗效果的重要标准。因此,本研究旨在验证波斯语版汉堡多发性硬化症生活质量问卷(HAQUAMS)在伊朗多发性硬化症患者中的应用。方法:在横断面研究中,通过人口普查抽样方法选择了158名多发性硬化症患者。首先在AMOS-22软件中采用验证性因子分析(confirmatory factor analysis, CFA)评估波斯语版HAQUAMS的构念效度,然后采用SPSS-22软件计算各子量表的内部一致性信度和项目总分相关性。结果:CFA和输出结果表明,伊朗MS患者的HAQUAMS具有五因素结构,在剔除一个项目并释放项目间协方差误差(RMSEA = 0.069)的情况下,具有较好的结构效度。HAQUAMS子量表的内部一致性可接受至极好(alpha值为0.81 ~ 0.91)。确定HAQUAMS建构效度的项目总分相关性分析显示,问卷各项目与其子量表均存在中至强正相关(P < 0.0001, r = 0.41 ~ 0.89)。HAQUAMS总分与贝克抑郁量表短表(BDI-13)的相关系数为0.74 (P < 0.0001),说明该量表的并发效度较好。结论:具有五因素结构的波斯语版HAQUAMS具有可接受的效度和信度,可用于伊朗MS患者健康相关生活质量的测量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Acta neurologica Taiwanica
Acta neurologica Taiwanica Medicine-Neurology (clinical)
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Acute Asymmetric Sensorimotor Variant of Chronic Inflammatory Demyelinating Polyneuropathy Triggered by mRNA-1273 COVID-19 Vaccination. Hemorrhagic shock due to retroperitoneal hemorrhage: a rare complication of lumbar puncture. Coexistence of IgLON5-IgG and SOX1-IgG in a Patient with Progressive Brainstem Dysfunction. Ross syndrome with chronic cough and RF positivity: a case report. Evidence-Based Taiwan Consensus Recommendations for the treatment of Parkinson's disease.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1