Dignity, coercion and involuntary psychiatric care: a study of involuntary and voluntary psychiatry inpatients in Dublin.

IF 2.9 4区 医学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY International Journal of Psychiatry in Clinical Practice Pub Date : 2022-09-01 Epub Date: 2022-01-09 DOI:10.1080/13651501.2021.2022162
R Plunkett, A K O'Callaghan, B D Kelly
{"title":"Dignity, coercion and involuntary psychiatric care: a study of involuntary and voluntary psychiatry inpatients in Dublin.","authors":"R Plunkett,&nbsp;A K O'Callaghan,&nbsp;B D Kelly","doi":"10.1080/13651501.2021.2022162","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>There is a paucity of research about psychiatric inpatients' experience of dignity. Most of the limited literature on this topic is qualitative. Our study provides quantitative data about self-rated dignity among involuntary and voluntary psychiatry inpatients. We explore relationships between perceived dignity and legal status, coercion, level of insight, diagnosis, and therapeutic alliance, among other parameters.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We recruited 107 participants aged 18 years or over from two inpatient psychiatric units in Dublin, Ireland over a 30-month period. Interviews consisted of structured, validated assessment tools. Demographic and clinical data were obtained from patient charts.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patient Dignity Inventory (PDI) score was non-normally distributed (skewed to the right), with a median score of 63.0 out of 125 (inter-quartile range: 40.0-80.0). On multi-variable testing, lower self-rated dignity was associated with higher perceived coercion, better insight and more negative symptoms. There was no association between dignity and gender, employment status, marital status, ethnicity, age, admission status, diagnosis, working alliance, positive symptoms or cognition.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Lack of dignity is linked with perceived coercion and negative symptoms, and is seen in patients with better insight. These links merit further study if we are to understand patient dignity in a more nuanced and useful way.KEYPOINTSWe interviewed psychiatric inpatients using the Patient Dignity Inventory and other structured assessment tools.There was no significant difference between voluntary and involuntary patient groups' self-rated dignity.Less self-rated dignity was seen in patients with higher levels of perceived coercion.Patients with better insight reported lower dignity.Dignity scores were not significantly associated with age, gender, ethnicity, diagnosis or length of stay in hospital.</p>","PeriodicalId":14351,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Psychiatry in Clinical Practice","volume":"26 3","pages":"269-276"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Psychiatry in Clinical Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13651501.2021.2022162","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/1/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Objectives: There is a paucity of research about psychiatric inpatients' experience of dignity. Most of the limited literature on this topic is qualitative. Our study provides quantitative data about self-rated dignity among involuntary and voluntary psychiatry inpatients. We explore relationships between perceived dignity and legal status, coercion, level of insight, diagnosis, and therapeutic alliance, among other parameters.

Methods: We recruited 107 participants aged 18 years or over from two inpatient psychiatric units in Dublin, Ireland over a 30-month period. Interviews consisted of structured, validated assessment tools. Demographic and clinical data were obtained from patient charts.

Results: Patient Dignity Inventory (PDI) score was non-normally distributed (skewed to the right), with a median score of 63.0 out of 125 (inter-quartile range: 40.0-80.0). On multi-variable testing, lower self-rated dignity was associated with higher perceived coercion, better insight and more negative symptoms. There was no association between dignity and gender, employment status, marital status, ethnicity, age, admission status, diagnosis, working alliance, positive symptoms or cognition.

Conclusions: Lack of dignity is linked with perceived coercion and negative symptoms, and is seen in patients with better insight. These links merit further study if we are to understand patient dignity in a more nuanced and useful way.KEYPOINTSWe interviewed psychiatric inpatients using the Patient Dignity Inventory and other structured assessment tools.There was no significant difference between voluntary and involuntary patient groups' self-rated dignity.Less self-rated dignity was seen in patients with higher levels of perceived coercion.Patients with better insight reported lower dignity.Dignity scores were not significantly associated with age, gender, ethnicity, diagnosis or length of stay in hospital.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
尊严、胁迫和非自愿精神病护理:都柏林非自愿和自愿精神病住院病人的研究。
目的:精神科住院患者尊严体验的研究较为缺乏。关于这一主题的有限文献大多是定性的。我们的研究提供了非自愿和自愿精神科住院患者自我评定尊严的定量数据。我们探讨了感知尊严与法律地位、胁迫、洞察力水平、诊断和治疗联盟以及其他参数之间的关系。方法:我们在30个月的时间里从爱尔兰都柏林的两个精神病住院病房招募了107名年龄在18岁或以上的参与者。访谈由结构化的、经过验证的评估工具组成。人口统计学和临床数据来自患者图表。结果:患者尊严量表(PDI)评分呈非正态分布(向右偏),中位得分为63.0分(总分125分)(四分位间距为40.0 ~ 80.0分)。在多变量测试中,较低的自我评价尊严与较高的感知强迫、更好的洞察力和更多的阴性症状相关。尊严与性别、就业状况、婚姻状况、种族、年龄、入院状况、诊断、工作联盟、阳性症状或认知没有关联。结论:缺乏尊严与感知到的胁迫和阴性症状有关,并且在洞察力较好的患者中可见。如果我们要以更细致和有用的方式理解病人的尊严,这些联系值得进一步研究。我们使用患者尊严量表和其他结构化评估工具对精神病住院患者进行了访谈。自愿和非自愿两组患者的自评尊严无显著差异。在感知到的强迫程度较高的患者中,自我评价的尊严程度较低。洞察力较强的患者自尊心较低。尊严得分与年龄、性别、种族、诊断或住院时间没有显著相关性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
3.30%
发文量
42
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: International Journal of Psychiatry in Clinical Practice provides an international forum for communication among health professionals with clinical, academic and research interests in psychiatry. The journal gives particular emphasis to papers that integrate the findings of academic research into realities of clinical practice. Focus on the practical aspects of managing and treating patients. Essential reading for the busy psychiatrist, trainee and interested physician. Includes original research papers, comprehensive review articles and short communications. Key words: Psychiatry, Neuropsychopharmacology, Mental health, Neuropsychiatry, Clinical Neurophysiology, Psychophysiology, Psychotherapy, Addiction, Schizophrenia, Depression, Bipolar Disorders and Anxiety.
期刊最新文献
Investigating psychiatric morbidity, hopelessness and suicide risk in patients with 22q11.2 deletion syndrome: a case-control study. The complex clinical and cognitive phenotype of adult patients with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and comorbid hoarding disorder. Lipid variability in drug-naïve individuals affected with Major Depressive Disorder: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Borderline personality disorder is an innate empathy anomaly: a scoping and narrative review. Relationship between coping strategies and change in symptom severity in contamination-focused OCD patients during the COVID-19: a one-year follow-up.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1