Ultrasonographic evaluation of deep vein thrombosis related to the central catheter in hemodialytic patients.

IF 3.4 Q2 Medicine Ultrasound Journal Pub Date : 2022-01-10 DOI:10.1186/s13089-021-00252-4
Ana Luisa Silveira Vieira, José Muniz Pazeli Júnior, Andrea Silva Matos, Andreza Marques Pereira, Izadora Rezende Pinto, Letícia Esteves de Oliveira Silva, Letícia Siqueira Guilherme, Sofia Laura Archângelo E Silva
{"title":"Ultrasonographic evaluation of deep vein thrombosis related to the central catheter in hemodialytic patients.","authors":"Ana Luisa Silveira Vieira,&nbsp;José Muniz Pazeli Júnior,&nbsp;Andrea Silva Matos,&nbsp;Andreza Marques Pereira,&nbsp;Izadora Rezende Pinto,&nbsp;Letícia Esteves de Oliveira Silva,&nbsp;Letícia Siqueira Guilherme,&nbsp;Sofia Laura Archângelo E Silva","doi":"10.1186/s13089-021-00252-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Point of care ultrasound (PoCUS) is a useful tool for the early diagnosis of thrombosis related to the central venous catheter for dialysis (TR-CVCd). However, the application of PoCUS is still not common as a bedside imaging examination and TR-CVCd remains often underdiagnosed in the routine practice. The aim of this study was to investigate if a compression technique for the diagnosis of TR-CVCd blindly performed by PoCUS experts and medical students is accurate when compared to a Doppler study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Two medical students without prior knowledge in PoCUS received a short theoretical-practical training to evaluate TR-CVCd of the internal jugular vein by means of the ultrasound compression technique. After the training phase, patients with central venous catheter for dialysis (CVCd) were evaluated by the students in a private hemodialysis clinic. The results were compared to those obtained on the same population by doctors with solid experience in PoCUS, using both the compression technique and the color Doppler.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eighty-one patients were eligible for the study and the prevalence of TR-CVCd diagnosed by Doppler was 28.4%. The compression technique performed by the students and by experts presented, respectively, a sensitivity of 59.2% (CI 51.6-66.8) vs 100% and a specificity of 89.6% (CI 84.9-94.3) vs 94.8% (CI 91.4-98.2).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The compression technique in the hands of PoCUS experts demonstrated high accuracy in the diagnosis of TR-CVCd and should represent a standard in the routine examination of dialytic patients. The training of PoCUS inexperienced students for the diagnosis of TR-CVCd is feasible but did not lead to a sufficient level of sensitivity.</p>","PeriodicalId":36911,"journal":{"name":"Ultrasound Journal","volume":" ","pages":"4"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8748564/pdf/","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ultrasound Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13089-021-00252-4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Background: Point of care ultrasound (PoCUS) is a useful tool for the early diagnosis of thrombosis related to the central venous catheter for dialysis (TR-CVCd). However, the application of PoCUS is still not common as a bedside imaging examination and TR-CVCd remains often underdiagnosed in the routine practice. The aim of this study was to investigate if a compression technique for the diagnosis of TR-CVCd blindly performed by PoCUS experts and medical students is accurate when compared to a Doppler study.

Methods: Two medical students without prior knowledge in PoCUS received a short theoretical-practical training to evaluate TR-CVCd of the internal jugular vein by means of the ultrasound compression technique. After the training phase, patients with central venous catheter for dialysis (CVCd) were evaluated by the students in a private hemodialysis clinic. The results were compared to those obtained on the same population by doctors with solid experience in PoCUS, using both the compression technique and the color Doppler.

Results: Eighty-one patients were eligible for the study and the prevalence of TR-CVCd diagnosed by Doppler was 28.4%. The compression technique performed by the students and by experts presented, respectively, a sensitivity of 59.2% (CI 51.6-66.8) vs 100% and a specificity of 89.6% (CI 84.9-94.3) vs 94.8% (CI 91.4-98.2).

Conclusion: The compression technique in the hands of PoCUS experts demonstrated high accuracy in the diagnosis of TR-CVCd and should represent a standard in the routine examination of dialytic patients. The training of PoCUS inexperienced students for the diagnosis of TR-CVCd is feasible but did not lead to a sufficient level of sensitivity.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
超声评价血液透析患者与中心导管相关的深静脉血栓形成。
背景:护理点超声(PoCUS)是早期诊断中心静脉透析导管(TR-CVCd)相关血栓形成的有效工具。然而,PoCUS作为床边影像学检查的应用仍然不常见,TR-CVCd在常规实践中仍然经常被误诊。本研究的目的是探讨由PoCUS专家和医学生进行的盲诊断TR-CVCd的压缩技术与多普勒研究相比是否准确。方法:对2名没有PoCUS相关知识的医学生进行短期的理论-实践训练,应用超声压迫技术评价颈内静脉TR-CVCd。训练结束后,学生在私人血液透析诊所对中心静脉导管透析(ccd)患者进行评估。将结果与具有丰富PoCUS经验的医生在同一人群中获得的结果进行比较,使用压缩技术和彩色多普勒。结果:81例患者符合研究条件,多普勒诊断的TR-CVCd患病率为28.4%。由学生和专家执行的压缩技术分别为59.2% (CI 51.6-66.8)和100%,特异性为89.6% (CI 84.9-94.3)和94.8% (CI 91.4-98.2)。结论:PoCUS专家手中的压缩技术对tr - cvd的诊断具有较高的准确性,应作为透析患者常规检查的标准。培训PoCUS经验不足的学生诊断TR-CVCd是可行的,但没有达到足够的灵敏度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Ultrasound Journal
Ultrasound Journal Health Professions-Radiological and Ultrasound Technology
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
2.90%
发文量
45
审稿时长
22 weeks
期刊最新文献
Quantitative valve motion assessment in adolescents using point-of-care ultrasound: short communication. A framework for flow time measured by Doppler ultrasound. Exploring the adoption of diaphragm and lung ultrasound (DLUS) by physiotherapists, physical therapists, and respiratory therapists: an updated scoping review. Comparison of two point-of-care lung ultrasound techniques and their associated outcomes for bronchiolitis in the pediatric emergency department. Evaluation of a modified venous excess ultrasound (VExUS) protocol for estimation of venous congestion: a cohort study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1