Rhinos and risk assessments: Adjusting risk assessment methodologies to account for 'unforeseeable' events.

Q3 Medicine Journal of business continuity & emergency planning Pub Date : 2021-01-01
Jo Robertson
{"title":"Rhinos and risk assessments: Adjusting risk assessment methodologies to account for 'unforeseeable' events.","authors":"Jo Robertson","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>It is wrong to describe the COVID-19 pandemic as a 'black swan' (ie a catastrophic event that no one saw coming). Far more apt would be to call it a 'grey rhino' - something that has long been predicted but overlooked by leadership the world over. This paper argues that it is time to stop relying on outdated risk formulas and adjust risk assessment methodologies to account for these grey rhinos. Simply put, it is time to accept that the potential impact of an event is more important than its likelihood.</p>","PeriodicalId":39080,"journal":{"name":"Journal of business continuity & emergency planning","volume":"15 2","pages":"196-204"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of business continuity & emergency planning","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

It is wrong to describe the COVID-19 pandemic as a 'black swan' (ie a catastrophic event that no one saw coming). Far more apt would be to call it a 'grey rhino' - something that has long been predicted but overlooked by leadership the world over. This paper argues that it is time to stop relying on outdated risk formulas and adjust risk assessment methodologies to account for these grey rhinos. Simply put, it is time to accept that the potential impact of an event is more important than its likelihood.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
犀牛和风险评估:调整风险评估方法以考虑“不可预见”的事件。
将COVID-19大流行描述为“黑天鹅”(即没有人预见到的灾难性事件)是错误的。更贴切的说法是“灰犀牛”——世界各国领导人早就预测到了这一点,但却忽视了这一点。本文认为,现在是时候停止依赖过时的风险公式,调整风险评估方法,以考虑这些灰犀牛。简单地说,现在是时候接受一个事实,即事件的潜在影响比其发生的可能性更重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
34
期刊介绍: Journal of Business Continuity & Emergency Planning is the leading professional journal publishing peer-reviewed articles and case studies written by and for business continuity and emergency managers.
期刊最新文献
A song of water and fire: Key lessons from Hurricane Fiona and Nova Scotia wildfires. Editorial. Knowledge production as an enabler to effective organisational resilience. Manitoba's provincial diagnostic and surgical recovery task force: Structure, processes and outcomes. Rapid disposition, emergency department flow and best practices in hospital mass casualty incident response.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1