Evolution of a concept with enzymatic debridement and autologous in situ cell and platelet-rich fibrin therapy (BroKerF).

Scars, burns & healing Pub Date : 2022-01-06 eCollection Date: 2022-01-01 DOI:10.1177/20595131211052394
Matthias Waldner, Tarek Ismail, Alexander Lunger, Holger J Klein, Riccardo Schweizer, Oramary Alan, Tabea Breckwoldt, Pietro Giovanoli, Jan A Plock
{"title":"Evolution of a concept with enzymatic debridement and autologous in situ cell and platelet-rich fibrin therapy (BroKerF).","authors":"Matthias Waldner,&nbsp;Tarek Ismail,&nbsp;Alexander Lunger,&nbsp;Holger J Klein,&nbsp;Riccardo Schweizer,&nbsp;Oramary Alan,&nbsp;Tabea Breckwoldt,&nbsp;Pietro Giovanoli,&nbsp;Jan A Plock","doi":"10.1177/20595131211052394","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Deep partial-thickness burns are traditionally treated by tangential excision and split thickness skin graft (STSG) coverage. STSGs create donor site morbidity and increase the wound surface in burn patients. Herein, we present a novel concept consisting of enzymatic debridement of deep partial-thickness burns followed by co-delivery of autologous keratinocyte suspension and plated-rich fibrin (PRF) or fibrin glue.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>In a retrospective case study, patients with deep partial-thickness burns treated with enzymatic debridement and autologous cell therapy combined with PRF or fibrin glue (BroKerF) between 2017 and 2018 were analysed. BroKerF was applied to up to 15% total body surface area (TBSA); larger injuries were combined with surgical excision and skin grafting. Exclusion criteria were age <18 or >70 years, I°, IIa°-only, III° burns and loss of follow-up.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 20 patients with burn injuries of 16.8% ± 10.3% TBSA and mean Abbreviated Burn Severity Score 5.45 ± 1.8 were identified. Of the patients, 65% (n = 13) were treated with PRF, while 35% (n = 7) were treated with fibrin glue. The mean area treated with BroKerF was 7.5% ± 0.05% TBSA, mean time to full epithelialization was 21.06 ± 9.2 days and mean hospitalization time was 24.7 ± 14.4 days. Of the patients, 35% (n = 7) needed additional STSG, 43% (n = 3) of whom had biopsy-proven wound infections.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>BroKerF is an innovative treatment strategy, which, in our opinion, will show its efficacy when higher standardization is achieved. The combination of selective debridement and autologous skin cells in a fibrin matrix combines regenerative measures for burn treatment.</p><p><strong>Lay summary: </strong>Patients suffering from large burn wounds often require the use of large skin grafts to bring burned areas to heal. Before the application of skin grafts, the burned skin must be removed either by surgery or using enzymatic agents. In this article, we describe a method where small areas of skin are taken and skin cells are extracted and sprayed on wound areas that were treated with an enzymatic agent. The cells are held in place by a substance extracted from patients' blood (PRF) that is sprayed on the wound together with the skin cells. We believe this technique can be helpful to reduce the need of skin grafts in burned patients and improve the healing process.</p>","PeriodicalId":21495,"journal":{"name":"Scars, burns & healing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8743980/pdf/","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scars, burns & healing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/20595131211052394","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: Deep partial-thickness burns are traditionally treated by tangential excision and split thickness skin graft (STSG) coverage. STSGs create donor site morbidity and increase the wound surface in burn patients. Herein, we present a novel concept consisting of enzymatic debridement of deep partial-thickness burns followed by co-delivery of autologous keratinocyte suspension and plated-rich fibrin (PRF) or fibrin glue.

Material and methods: In a retrospective case study, patients with deep partial-thickness burns treated with enzymatic debridement and autologous cell therapy combined with PRF or fibrin glue (BroKerF) between 2017 and 2018 were analysed. BroKerF was applied to up to 15% total body surface area (TBSA); larger injuries were combined with surgical excision and skin grafting. Exclusion criteria were age <18 or >70 years, I°, IIa°-only, III° burns and loss of follow-up.

Results: A total of 20 patients with burn injuries of 16.8% ± 10.3% TBSA and mean Abbreviated Burn Severity Score 5.45 ± 1.8 were identified. Of the patients, 65% (n = 13) were treated with PRF, while 35% (n = 7) were treated with fibrin glue. The mean area treated with BroKerF was 7.5% ± 0.05% TBSA, mean time to full epithelialization was 21.06 ± 9.2 days and mean hospitalization time was 24.7 ± 14.4 days. Of the patients, 35% (n = 7) needed additional STSG, 43% (n = 3) of whom had biopsy-proven wound infections.

Conclusion: BroKerF is an innovative treatment strategy, which, in our opinion, will show its efficacy when higher standardization is achieved. The combination of selective debridement and autologous skin cells in a fibrin matrix combines regenerative measures for burn treatment.

Lay summary: Patients suffering from large burn wounds often require the use of large skin grafts to bring burned areas to heal. Before the application of skin grafts, the burned skin must be removed either by surgery or using enzymatic agents. In this article, we describe a method where small areas of skin are taken and skin cells are extracted and sprayed on wound areas that were treated with an enzymatic agent. The cells are held in place by a substance extracted from patients' blood (PRF) that is sprayed on the wound together with the skin cells. We believe this technique can be helpful to reduce the need of skin grafts in burned patients and improve the healing process.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
酶清创和自体原位细胞和富血小板纤维蛋白治疗概念的演变(BroKerF)。
背景:深部部分厚度烧伤传统上采用切向切除和分层植皮(STSG)覆盖治疗。在烧伤患者中,STSG会造成供体部位的发病率并增加伤口表面。在此,我们提出了一个新的概念,包括深部部分厚度烧伤的酶清创术,然后联合递送自体角质形成细胞悬浮液和富含纤维蛋白(PRF)或纤维蛋白胶。材料和方法:在一项回顾性病例研究中,分析了2017年至2018年间接受酶清创术和自体细胞疗法联合PRF或纤维蛋白胶(BroKerF)治疗的深部部分厚度烧伤患者。BroKerF应用于高达15%的总体表面积(TBSA);较大的损伤合并手术切除和植皮。排除标准为年龄70岁、仅I°、IIa°、III°烧伤和失去随访。结果:共有20名烧伤患者,占16.8% ± 10.3%TBSA和平均缩写烧伤严重程度评分5.45 ± 1.8。在这些患者中,65%(n=13)接受了PRF治疗,而35%(n=13 = 7) 用纤维蛋白胶处理。BroKerF治疗的平均面积为7.5% ± 0.05%TBSA,完全上皮化的平均时间为21.06 ± 9.2天,平均住院时间为24.7 ± 14.4天。在患者中,35%(n = 7) 需要额外的STSG,43%(n = 3) 其中有活检证实的伤口感染。结论:BroKerF是一种创新的治疗策略,在我们看来,当达到更高的标准化时,它将显示出其疗效。纤维蛋白基质中选择性清创术和自体皮肤细胞的结合结合了烧伤治疗的再生措施。总结:患有大面积烧伤的患者通常需要使用大面积的皮肤移植物来愈合烧伤区域。在应用皮肤移植物之前,必须通过手术或使用酶制剂去除烧伤的皮肤。在这篇文章中,我们描述了一种方法,即取小面积的皮肤,提取皮肤细胞并将其喷洒在用酶制剂处理的伤口区域。这些细胞由从患者血液中提取的物质(PRF)固定在适当的位置,该物质与皮肤细胞一起喷洒在伤口上。我们相信这项技术有助于减少烧伤患者的皮肤移植需求,改善愈合过程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Effect of oral Calendula officinalis on second-degree burn wound healing. To bleed or not to bleed? Case series and discussion of haemorrhage risk with enzymatic debridement in burn injuries. An evaluation of clinical psychology input into burns multidisciplinary follow-up clinics. The efficacy of combined ultrasound and electric field stimulation therapy in the treatment of venous leg ulcers. Protocol for clinical diagnosis and empiric treatment of pulmonary tuberculosis in severely burned patients: observations and literature review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1