Nutrition Literacy Measurement Tool With Multiple Features for Chinese Adults.

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY Food and Nutrition Bulletin Pub Date : 2022-06-01 Epub Date: 2022-01-13 DOI:10.1177/03795721211073221
Yunqiu Zhang, Qing Sun, Min Zhang, Guangju Mo, Huaqing Liu
{"title":"Nutrition Literacy Measurement Tool With Multiple Features for Chinese Adults.","authors":"Yunqiu Zhang,&nbsp;Qing Sun,&nbsp;Min Zhang,&nbsp;Guangju Mo,&nbsp;Huaqing Liu","doi":"10.1177/03795721211073221","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Nutrition literacy is an emerging term which is increasingly used in policy and research. Progression is limited by the lack of an accepted method to measure nutrition literacy in Chinese adults, even as research in this area is growing.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objective of this study is to develop a valid instrument to assess nutrition literacy in Chinese adults.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The process involved 2 steps: constructed nutrition literacy conceptual framework, and developed potential items of scale based on literature review; and conducted 2 rounds of Delphi consultation to select items of the preliminary questionnaire.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the Delphi survey, the content validity index for each domain, level, and dimension of nutrition literacy was 1.0, coefficient of variation was less than 0.10, and Kendall's coefficient of concordance was greater than 0.83. All of the 2 domains, 3 levels, and 6 dimensions initially formulated by our research team were reserved in the conceptual framework of nutrition literacy. Furthermore, a 43-item nutrition literacy measurement scale was established. Each item kept in the final scale reaches a high degree of concentration and a high degree of coordination, with the mean of importance ranging from 4.38 to 5.00.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A nutrition literacy measurement scale with multiple features was established for Chinese adults, providing an operationalized tool to assess comprehensively nutrition literacy for research and practice in the field of nutrition, diet, and health.</p>","PeriodicalId":12394,"journal":{"name":"Food and Nutrition Bulletin","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Food and Nutrition Bulletin","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/03795721211073221","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/1/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Background: Nutrition literacy is an emerging term which is increasingly used in policy and research. Progression is limited by the lack of an accepted method to measure nutrition literacy in Chinese adults, even as research in this area is growing.

Objective: The objective of this study is to develop a valid instrument to assess nutrition literacy in Chinese adults.

Methods: The process involved 2 steps: constructed nutrition literacy conceptual framework, and developed potential items of scale based on literature review; and conducted 2 rounds of Delphi consultation to select items of the preliminary questionnaire.

Results: In the Delphi survey, the content validity index for each domain, level, and dimension of nutrition literacy was 1.0, coefficient of variation was less than 0.10, and Kendall's coefficient of concordance was greater than 0.83. All of the 2 domains, 3 levels, and 6 dimensions initially formulated by our research team were reserved in the conceptual framework of nutrition literacy. Furthermore, a 43-item nutrition literacy measurement scale was established. Each item kept in the final scale reaches a high degree of concentration and a high degree of coordination, with the mean of importance ranging from 4.38 to 5.00.

Conclusions: A nutrition literacy measurement scale with multiple features was established for Chinese adults, providing an operationalized tool to assess comprehensively nutrition literacy for research and practice in the field of nutrition, diet, and health.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
中国成人多特征营养素养测评工具。
背景:营养素养是一个新兴的术语,越来越多地用于政策和研究。由于缺乏一种公认的方法来衡量中国成年人的营养素养,这方面的进展受到限制,尽管这方面的研究正在增多。目的:本研究的目的是开发一种有效的工具来评估中国成年人的营养素养。方法:构建营养素养概念框架,在文献回顾的基础上编制潜在量表项;并进行2轮德尔菲咨询,选择初步问卷的项目。结果:德尔菲调查中,营养素养各领域、各水平、各维度的内容效度指数为1.0,变异系数小于0.10,肯德尔一致性系数大于0.83。我们研究小组最初制定的2个领域、3个层次和6个维度都保留在营养素养的概念框架中。并编制了43项营养素养测评量表。最终量表中保留的每个项目都达到了高度集中和高度协调的程度,重要性的平均值在4.38到5.00之间。结论:建立了具有多种特征的中国成人营养素养测评量表,为营养、饮食与健康领域的研究与实践提供了一套可操作的综合营养素养测评工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Food and Nutrition Bulletin
Food and Nutrition Bulletin 工程技术-食品科技
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
31
审稿时长
18-36 weeks
期刊介绍: The Food and Nutrition Bulletin (FNB,) is a peer-reviewed, academic journal published quarterly by the Nevin Scrimshaw International Nutrition Foundation. The Journal is one of the leading resources used by researchers, academics, nutrition policy makers and planners in over 125 countries to obtain the most current research and policy information related to nutrition in developing countries.
期刊最新文献
A Landscape of Micronutrient Dietary Intake by 15- to 65-Years-Old Urban Population in 8 Latin American Countries: Results From the Latin American Study of Health and Nutrition. Micronutrient Deficiencies in Older Adults in Latin America: A Narrative Review. Considerations for Correction of Micronutrient Deficiencies Through Supplementation in Pregnant Women and Children Under-5 in Latin America. Exploring the FAO Minimum Dietary Diversity Indicator as a Suitable Proxy of Micronutrient Adequacy in Men and Women Across Reproductive and Non-reproductive Ages in 8 Latin American Countries. Perspective on Emerging Micronutrient Deficiencies in Latin America and the Caribbean.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1