Nathan Pavey , Mana Higashihara , Mehdi A.J. van den Bos , Parvathi Menon , Steve Vucic
{"title":"The split-elbow index: A biomarker of the split elbow sign in ALS","authors":"Nathan Pavey , Mana Higashihara , Mehdi A.J. van den Bos , Parvathi Menon , Steve Vucic","doi":"10.1016/j.cnp.2021.11.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>The split elbow sign is a clinical feature of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), characterised by preferential weakness of biceps brachii muscle compared to triceps. A novel neurophysiological index, termed the <em>split elbow index (SEI)</em>, was developed to quantify the split-elbow sign, and assess its utility in ALS.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Clinical and neurophysiological assessment was prospectively undertaken on 34 ALS patients and 32 ALS mimics. Compound muscle action potential (CMAP) amplitude was recorded from biceps brachii and triceps muscles from which the SEI was calculated using the following formula:</p><p><span><math><mrow><mi>SEI</mi><mo>=</mo><mfrac><mrow><mi>CMAPamplitudeBICEPSBRACHII</mi></mrow><mrow><mi>CMAPamplitudeTRICEPSBRACHII</mi></mrow></mfrac></mrow></math></span></p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The split elbow sign was significantly more common in ALS patients when compared to ALS mimic patients (P < 0.05). The SEI was significantly reduced in ALS patients when compared to ALS mimics (P < 0.01). This reduction was evident in spinal and bulbar onset ALS. A SEI cut-off value of ≤0.62 exhibited a sensitivity of 71% and specificity of 61%.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The split elbow sign is significantly more common in ALS patients, and was supported by a reduction in the SEI.</p></div><div><h3>Significance</h3><p>The SEI may be utilised as a surrogate biomarker of the split elbow sign in future ALS studies.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":45697,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Neurophysiology Practice","volume":"7 ","pages":"Pages 16-20"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/04/5a/main.PMC8733259.pdf","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Neurophysiology Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2467981X21000482","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
Abstract
Objective
The split elbow sign is a clinical feature of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), characterised by preferential weakness of biceps brachii muscle compared to triceps. A novel neurophysiological index, termed the split elbow index (SEI), was developed to quantify the split-elbow sign, and assess its utility in ALS.
Methods
Clinical and neurophysiological assessment was prospectively undertaken on 34 ALS patients and 32 ALS mimics. Compound muscle action potential (CMAP) amplitude was recorded from biceps brachii and triceps muscles from which the SEI was calculated using the following formula:
Results
The split elbow sign was significantly more common in ALS patients when compared to ALS mimic patients (P < 0.05). The SEI was significantly reduced in ALS patients when compared to ALS mimics (P < 0.01). This reduction was evident in spinal and bulbar onset ALS. A SEI cut-off value of ≤0.62 exhibited a sensitivity of 71% and specificity of 61%.
Conclusions
The split elbow sign is significantly more common in ALS patients, and was supported by a reduction in the SEI.
Significance
The SEI may be utilised as a surrogate biomarker of the split elbow sign in future ALS studies.
期刊介绍:
Clinical Neurophysiology Practice (CNP) is a new Open Access journal that focuses on clinical practice issues in clinical neurophysiology including relevant new research, case reports or clinical series, normal values and didactic reviews. It is an official journal of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology and complements Clinical Neurophysiology which focuses on innovative research in the specialty. It has a role in supporting established clinical practice, and an educational role for trainees, technicians and practitioners.