Decision-making for Parents of Children With Medical Complexities: Activity Theory Analysis.

Q2 Medicine Journal of Participatory Medicine Pub Date : 2022-01-17 DOI:10.2196/31699
Francine Buchanan, Claudia Lai, Eyal Cohen, Golda Milo-Manson, Aviv Shachak
{"title":"Decision-making for Parents of Children With Medical Complexities: Activity Theory Analysis.","authors":"Francine Buchanan,&nbsp;Claudia Lai,&nbsp;Eyal Cohen,&nbsp;Golda Milo-Manson,&nbsp;Aviv Shachak","doi":"10.2196/31699","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Shared decision-making (SDM), a collaborative approach to reach decisional agreement, has been advocated as an ideal model of decision-making in the medical encounter. Frameworks for SDM have been developed largely from the clinical context of a competent adult patient facing a single medical problem, presented with multiple treatment options informed by a solid base of evidence. It is difficult to apply this model to the pediatric setting and children with medical complexity (CMC), specifically since parents of CMC often face a myriad of interconnected decisions with minimal evidence available on the multiple complex and co-existing chronic conditions. Thus, solutions that are developed based on the traditional model of SDM may not improve SDM practices for CMCs and may be a factor contributing to the low rate of SDM practiced with CMCs.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The goal of our study was to address the gaps in the current approach to SDM for CMC by better understanding the decision-making activity among parents of CMCs and exploring what comprises their decision-making activity.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We interviewed 12 participants using semistructured interviews based on activity theory. Participants identified as either a parent of a CMC or a CMC over the age of 18 years. Qualitative framework analysis and an activity theory framework were employed to understand the complexity of the decision-making process in context.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Parents of CMCs in our study made decisions based on a mental model of their child's illness, informed by the activities of problem-solving, seeking understanding, obtaining tests and treatment, and caregiving. These findings suggest that the basis for parental choice and values, which are used in the decision-making activity, was developed by including activities that build concrete understanding and capture evidence to support their decisions.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our interviews with parents of CMCs suggest that we can address both the aims of each individual activity and the related outcomes (both intended and unintended) by viewing the decision-making activity as a combination of caregiving, problem-solving, and seeking activities. Clinicians could consider using this lens to focus decision-making discussions on integrating the child's unique situation, the insights parents gain through their decision-making activity, and their clinical knowledge to enhance the understanding between parents and health care providers, beyond the narrow concept of parental values.</p>","PeriodicalId":36208,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Participatory Medicine","volume":"14 1","pages":"e31699"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8804956/pdf/","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Participatory Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2196/31699","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Background: Shared decision-making (SDM), a collaborative approach to reach decisional agreement, has been advocated as an ideal model of decision-making in the medical encounter. Frameworks for SDM have been developed largely from the clinical context of a competent adult patient facing a single medical problem, presented with multiple treatment options informed by a solid base of evidence. It is difficult to apply this model to the pediatric setting and children with medical complexity (CMC), specifically since parents of CMC often face a myriad of interconnected decisions with minimal evidence available on the multiple complex and co-existing chronic conditions. Thus, solutions that are developed based on the traditional model of SDM may not improve SDM practices for CMCs and may be a factor contributing to the low rate of SDM practiced with CMCs.

Objective: The goal of our study was to address the gaps in the current approach to SDM for CMC by better understanding the decision-making activity among parents of CMCs and exploring what comprises their decision-making activity.

Methods: We interviewed 12 participants using semistructured interviews based on activity theory. Participants identified as either a parent of a CMC or a CMC over the age of 18 years. Qualitative framework analysis and an activity theory framework were employed to understand the complexity of the decision-making process in context.

Results: Parents of CMCs in our study made decisions based on a mental model of their child's illness, informed by the activities of problem-solving, seeking understanding, obtaining tests and treatment, and caregiving. These findings suggest that the basis for parental choice and values, which are used in the decision-making activity, was developed by including activities that build concrete understanding and capture evidence to support their decisions.

Conclusions: Our interviews with parents of CMCs suggest that we can address both the aims of each individual activity and the related outcomes (both intended and unintended) by viewing the decision-making activity as a combination of caregiving, problem-solving, and seeking activities. Clinicians could consider using this lens to focus decision-making discussions on integrating the child's unique situation, the insights parents gain through their decision-making activity, and their clinical knowledge to enhance the understanding between parents and health care providers, beyond the narrow concept of parental values.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
医疗复杂性患儿家长的决策:活动理论分析。
背景:共享决策(Shared decision, SDM)是一种达成决策共识的协作方式,被认为是医疗偶遇中理想的决策模式。SDM框架主要是根据一个有能力的成年患者面临单一医疗问题的临床背景制定的,该患者有坚实的证据基础,可以选择多种治疗方案。将该模型应用于儿科环境和患有医学复杂性(CMC)的儿童是困难的,特别是因为CMC的父母经常面临无数相互关联的决策,而关于多种复杂和共存的慢性疾病的证据却很少。因此,基于传统SDM模型开发的解决方案可能无法改善cmc的SDM实践,并且可能是cmc实践SDM率低的一个因素。目的:本研究的目的是通过更好地了解CMC家长的决策活动并探索其决策活动的组成部分,来解决当前CMC可持续发展管理方法中的空白。方法:采用基于活动理论的半结构化访谈法对12名参与者进行访谈。参加者须为年满18岁的委员家长或委员。采用定性框架分析和活动理论框架来理解情境下决策过程的复杂性。结果:在我们的研究中,cmc的父母根据他们孩子的疾病的心理模型做出决定,通过解决问题、寻求理解、获得测试和治疗以及照顾的活动。这些发现表明,在决策活动中使用的父母选择和价值观的基础是通过包括建立具体理解和获取支持其决策的证据的活动来发展的。结论:我们对cmc家长的访谈表明,通过将决策活动视为照顾、解决问题和寻求活动的结合,我们可以解决每个单独活动的目标和相关结果(包括有意的和无意的)。临床医生可以考虑利用这一视角,将决策讨论的重点放在整合孩子的独特情况、父母通过决策活动获得的见解以及他们的临床知识上,以增强父母与医疗保健提供者之间的理解,超越父母价值观的狭隘概念。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Participatory Medicine
Journal of Participatory Medicine Medicine-Medicine (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Value Propositions for Digital Shared Medication Plans to Boost Patient-Health Care Professional Partnerships: Co-Design Study. Assessing Physician and Patient Agreement on Whether Patient Outcomes Captured in Clinical Progress Notes Reflect Treatment Success: Cross-Sectional Study. Using Community Engagement to Create a Telecoaching Intervention to Improve Self-Management in Adolescents and Young Adults With Cystic Fibrosis: Qualitative Study. Developing a Digital Tool to Calculate Protein Quality in Plant-Based Meals of Older Adults: User Engagement Design Approach With End Users. From English to "Englishes": A Process Perspective on Enhancing the Linguistic Responsiveness of Culturally Tailored Cancer Prevention Interventions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1