John T Rivers, Carla Smith, Ian Smith, James Cameron
{"title":"The Impact of a Mobile App on Participation in Cardiac Rehabilitation and Understanding Barriers to Success: Comparative Cohort Study.","authors":"John T Rivers, Carla Smith, Ian Smith, James Cameron","doi":"10.2196/24174","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Poor patient uptake of cardiac rehabilitation (CR) remains a challenge for multiple reasons including geographic, time, cultural, cost, and psychological constraints.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>We evaluated the impact on CR participation rates associated with the addition of the option of mobile app-based CR (Cardihab) for patients declining conventional CR.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 204 consecutive patients were offered CR following angioplasty; of these, 99 were in cohort 1 (offered conventional CR only) and 105 were in cohort 2 (app-based CR offered to those declining conventional CR). Patients in each cohort were followed throughout a 6-week CR program and participation rates were compared for both groups. Patients in cohort 2 declining both forms of CR were interviewed to assess reasons for nonparticipation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>CR participation improved from 21% (95% CI 14%-30%) to 63% (95% CI 53%-71%) with the addition of the app (P<.001). Approximately 25% (9/39) of the group declining the app-based program identified technology issues as the reason for nonparticipation. The remainder declined both CR programs or were ineligible due to frailty or comorbidities.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Providing patients with the additional option of an app-based CR program substantially improved CR participation. Technology and psychological barriers can limit CR participation. Further innovation in CR delivery systems is required to improve uptake.</p>","PeriodicalId":14706,"journal":{"name":"JMIR Cardio","volume":" ","pages":"e24174"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8804955/pdf/","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JMIR Cardio","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2196/24174","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
Abstract
Background: Poor patient uptake of cardiac rehabilitation (CR) remains a challenge for multiple reasons including geographic, time, cultural, cost, and psychological constraints.
Objective: We evaluated the impact on CR participation rates associated with the addition of the option of mobile app-based CR (Cardihab) for patients declining conventional CR.
Methods: A total of 204 consecutive patients were offered CR following angioplasty; of these, 99 were in cohort 1 (offered conventional CR only) and 105 were in cohort 2 (app-based CR offered to those declining conventional CR). Patients in each cohort were followed throughout a 6-week CR program and participation rates were compared for both groups. Patients in cohort 2 declining both forms of CR were interviewed to assess reasons for nonparticipation.
Results: CR participation improved from 21% (95% CI 14%-30%) to 63% (95% CI 53%-71%) with the addition of the app (P<.001). Approximately 25% (9/39) of the group declining the app-based program identified technology issues as the reason for nonparticipation. The remainder declined both CR programs or were ineligible due to frailty or comorbidities.
Conclusions: Providing patients with the additional option of an app-based CR program substantially improved CR participation. Technology and psychological barriers can limit CR participation. Further innovation in CR delivery systems is required to improve uptake.
背景:由于地理、时间、文化、成本和心理限制等多种原因,患者对心脏康复(CR)的接受程度较差仍然是一个挑战。目的:我们评估增加基于移动应用程序的CR (Cardihab)选项对降低常规CR的患者CR参与率的影响。方法:共204例连续患者在血管成形术后接受CR;其中,99人在队列1(仅提供传统CR), 105人在队列2(为传统CR下降的患者提供基于应用程序的CR)。每个队列的患者在整个6周的CR计划中随访,并比较两组的参与率。对两种CR均下降的队列2患者进行访谈,以评估不参与的原因。结果:添加应用程序后,CR参与率从21% (95% CI 14%-30%)提高到63% (95% CI 53%-71%)。结论:为患者提供基于应用程序的CR计划的额外选择,大大提高了CR参与率。技术和心理障碍会限制CR的参与。需要进一步创新CR提供系统以提高吸收。