Cognitive Orientation to Daily Occupational Performance (CO-OP) in Children with Cerebral Palsy: A Systematic Review with Meta-analysis.

IF 1.6 3区 医学 Q2 REHABILITATION Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy-Revue Canadienne D Ergotherapie Pub Date : 2022-03-01 Epub Date: 2022-01-19 DOI:10.1177/00084174211066651
Meysam Roostaei, Hamid Dalvand, Mehdi Rassafiani, Greg Kelly, Bahman Razi
{"title":"Cognitive Orientation to Daily Occupational Performance (CO-OP) in Children with Cerebral Palsy: A Systematic Review with Meta-analysis.","authors":"Meysam Roostaei,&nbsp;Hamid Dalvand,&nbsp;Mehdi Rassafiani,&nbsp;Greg Kelly,&nbsp;Bahman Razi","doi":"10.1177/00084174211066651","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Cognitive orientation to daily occupational performance (CO-OP) is a client-centered treatment approach that was developed in the 1990s by occupational therapists. <b>Purpose:</b> Exploring current evidence about the effectiveness of CO-OP on children with cerebral palsy (CP). <b>Method:</b> Major electronic databases were searched. A narrative synthesis of current literature and meta-analyses on randomized control trials (RCTs) were conducted on changes in occupational performance. <b>Findings:</b> Seven studies with 103 participants were included. Four studies were RCTs with moderate levels of evidence, and three studies had single-subject designs. Although beneficial effects of CO-OP on goal achievement and transferring learned skills were reported, meta-analyses showed that CO-OP had no significant effect on the performance (WMD = 1.52, 95% CI = -1.58 to 4.63, <i>P</i> = .33) and satisfaction domains (WMD = 1.71, 95% CI = -1.14 to 4.57, <i>P</i> = .24) of Canadian Occupational Performance Measure scores compared to alternative interventions. <b>Implications:</b> CO-OP improves occupational performance but not more than alternative interventions. Results are inconclusive due to small sample sizes and heterogeneity of alternative interventions and participants. Therefore, research with a larger number of participants with sound RCT methods is needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":49097,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy-Revue Canadienne D Ergotherapie","volume":"89 1","pages":"72-91"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy-Revue Canadienne D Ergotherapie","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00084174211066651","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/1/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Background: Cognitive orientation to daily occupational performance (CO-OP) is a client-centered treatment approach that was developed in the 1990s by occupational therapists. Purpose: Exploring current evidence about the effectiveness of CO-OP on children with cerebral palsy (CP). Method: Major electronic databases were searched. A narrative synthesis of current literature and meta-analyses on randomized control trials (RCTs) were conducted on changes in occupational performance. Findings: Seven studies with 103 participants were included. Four studies were RCTs with moderate levels of evidence, and three studies had single-subject designs. Although beneficial effects of CO-OP on goal achievement and transferring learned skills were reported, meta-analyses showed that CO-OP had no significant effect on the performance (WMD = 1.52, 95% CI = -1.58 to 4.63, P = .33) and satisfaction domains (WMD = 1.71, 95% CI = -1.14 to 4.57, P = .24) of Canadian Occupational Performance Measure scores compared to alternative interventions. Implications: CO-OP improves occupational performance but not more than alternative interventions. Results are inconclusive due to small sample sizes and heterogeneity of alternative interventions and participants. Therefore, research with a larger number of participants with sound RCT methods is needed.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
脑瘫儿童对日常职业表现的认知取向:一项meta分析的系统综述。
背景:日常职业表现认知取向(CO-OP)是20世纪90年代由职业治疗师发展起来的一种以客户为中心的治疗方法。目的:探讨CO-OP治疗脑瘫(CP)患儿有效性的现有证据。方法:检索各大电子数据库。本文对当前文献进行了叙述性综合,并对随机对照试验(rct)进行了meta分析,以了解职业绩效的变化。研究结果:纳入了7项研究,共103名参与者。4项研究为中等水平证据的随机对照试验,3项研究为单受试者设计。虽然CO-OP对目标实现和学习技能的转移有有益的影响,但荟萃分析显示,与其他干预措施相比,CO-OP对加拿大职业绩效测量得分的表现(WMD = 1.52, 95% CI = -1.58至4.63,P = 0.33)和满意度域(WMD = 1.71, 95% CI = -1.14至4.57,P = 0.24)没有显著影响。启示:CO-OP提高了职业绩效,但并不比其他干预措施更有效。由于样本量小,替代干预措施和参与者的异质性,结果尚无定论。因此,需要有更多的参与者和完善的随机对照试验方法进行研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
11.10%
发文量
46
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy was first published in September 1933. Since that time, it has fostered advancement and growth in occupational therapy scholarship. The mission of the journal is to provide a forum for leading-edge occupational therapy scholarship that advances theory, practice, research, and policy. The vision is to be a high-quality scholarly journal that is at the forefront of the science of occupational therapy and a destination journal for the top scholars in the field, globally.
期刊最新文献
Anatomy Learning Outcomes in Occupational Therapy: Impact of Prior Coursework. Therapeutic-Use-of-Self as Relational Pedagogy in Occupational Therapy Education: A Qualitative Description Study. Thank You! ∼ Merci! Mobilizing Critical Occupational Therapy Praxis to Promote Structural Justice, Equity, and Rights[Formula: see text]. Occupational Participation Among Older Adults During the COVID-19 Pandemic.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1