Validation of Sonographic Fronto-Occipital Ratio Based on Anatomical Landmarks Compared to MR/CT-Derived Indexes in Children with Chiari II and Ventriculomegaly.

IF 0.9 4区 医学 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Pediatric Neurosurgery Pub Date : 2022-01-01 Epub Date: 2021-12-22 DOI:10.1159/000521622
Michele Retrouvey, Arastoo Vossough, Alireza Zandifar, Richard D Bellah, Gregory G Heuer, John Flibotte, Luis O Tierradentro-Garcia, Sandra Saade-Lemus, Jorge Du Ub Kim, Susan J Back, Summer L Kaplan
{"title":"Validation of Sonographic Fronto-Occipital Ratio Based on Anatomical Landmarks Compared to MR/CT-Derived Indexes in Children with Chiari II and Ventriculomegaly.","authors":"Michele Retrouvey,&nbsp;Arastoo Vossough,&nbsp;Alireza Zandifar,&nbsp;Richard D Bellah,&nbsp;Gregory G Heuer,&nbsp;John Flibotte,&nbsp;Luis O Tierradentro-Garcia,&nbsp;Sandra Saade-Lemus,&nbsp;Jorge Du Ub Kim,&nbsp;Susan J Back,&nbsp;Summer L Kaplan","doi":"10.1159/000521622","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Ultrasound (US)-based indexes such as fronto-occipital ratio (FOR) can be used to obtain an acceptable estimation of ventricular volume. Patients with colpocephaly present a unique challenge due to the shape of their ventricles. In the present study, we aimed to evaluate the validity and reproducibility of the modified US-FOR index in children with Chiari II-related ventriculomegaly.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this retrospective study, we evaluated Chiari II patients younger than 1 year who underwent head US and MR or CT scans for ventriculomegaly evaluation. MR/CT-based FOR was measured in the axial plane by identifying the widest diameter of frontal horns, occipital horns, and the interparietal diameter (IPD). US-based FOR (US-FOR) was measured using the largest diameter based on the following landmarks: frontal horn and IPD in the coronal plane at the level of the foramen of Monro, IPD just superior to the Sylvian fissures, and occipital horn posterior to the thalami and inferior to the superior margins of the thalami. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) were used to evaluate inter-rater reliability, and Pearson correlation coefficients and Bland-Altman plots were applied to assess agreement between US and other two modalities.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sixty-three paired US and MR/CT exams were assessed for agreement between US-FOR and MR/CT-FOR measurements. ICC showed an excellent inter-rater reliability for US-FOR (ICC = 0.99, p < 0.001) and MR/CT-FOR (ICC = 0.99, p < 0.001) measurements. The mean (range) values based on US-FOR showed a slight overestimation in comparison with MR/CT-FOR (0.51 [0.36-0.68] vs. 0.46 [0.34-0.64]). The Pearson correlation coefficient showed high cross-modality agreement for the FOR index (r = 0.83, p < 0.001). The Bland-Altman plot showed excellent concordance between US-FOR and MR/CT-FOR with a bias of 0.05 (95% CI: -0.03 to 0.13).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>US-FOR in the coronal plane is a comparable tool for evaluating ventriculomegaly in Chiari II patients when compared with MR/CT-FOR, even in the context of colpocephaly.</p>","PeriodicalId":54631,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric Neurosurgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatric Neurosurgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000521622","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/12/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Ultrasound (US)-based indexes such as fronto-occipital ratio (FOR) can be used to obtain an acceptable estimation of ventricular volume. Patients with colpocephaly present a unique challenge due to the shape of their ventricles. In the present study, we aimed to evaluate the validity and reproducibility of the modified US-FOR index in children with Chiari II-related ventriculomegaly.

Methods: In this retrospective study, we evaluated Chiari II patients younger than 1 year who underwent head US and MR or CT scans for ventriculomegaly evaluation. MR/CT-based FOR was measured in the axial plane by identifying the widest diameter of frontal horns, occipital horns, and the interparietal diameter (IPD). US-based FOR (US-FOR) was measured using the largest diameter based on the following landmarks: frontal horn and IPD in the coronal plane at the level of the foramen of Monro, IPD just superior to the Sylvian fissures, and occipital horn posterior to the thalami and inferior to the superior margins of the thalami. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) were used to evaluate inter-rater reliability, and Pearson correlation coefficients and Bland-Altman plots were applied to assess agreement between US and other two modalities.

Results: Sixty-three paired US and MR/CT exams were assessed for agreement between US-FOR and MR/CT-FOR measurements. ICC showed an excellent inter-rater reliability for US-FOR (ICC = 0.99, p < 0.001) and MR/CT-FOR (ICC = 0.99, p < 0.001) measurements. The mean (range) values based on US-FOR showed a slight overestimation in comparison with MR/CT-FOR (0.51 [0.36-0.68] vs. 0.46 [0.34-0.64]). The Pearson correlation coefficient showed high cross-modality agreement for the FOR index (r = 0.83, p < 0.001). The Bland-Altman plot showed excellent concordance between US-FOR and MR/CT-FOR with a bias of 0.05 (95% CI: -0.03 to 0.13).

Conclusion: US-FOR in the coronal plane is a comparable tool for evaluating ventriculomegaly in Chiari II patients when compared with MR/CT-FOR, even in the context of colpocephaly.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于解剖标志的超声额枕比与MR/ ct衍生指标在Chiari II和脑室肿大儿童中的验证。
基于超声(US)的指标,如额枕比(FOR)可用于获得可接受的心室容积估计。由于脑室的形状,阴道畸形患者提出了一个独特的挑战。在本研究中,我们旨在评估改良US-FOR指数在Chiari ii型脑室肥大患儿中的有效性和可重复性。方法:在这项回顾性研究中,我们评估了年龄小于1岁的Chiari II型患者,他们接受了头部US和MR或CT扫描来评估脑室肿大。通过识别额角、枕角的最宽直径和顶骨间直径(IPD),在轴向面测量基于MR/ ct的FOR。基于以下标志使用最大直径测量US-FOR:额角和位于Monro孔水平的冠状面IPD, IPD位于Sylvian裂缝上方,枕角位于丘脑后缘和丘脑上缘下方。类内相关系数(ICCs)用于评估评级间的信度,Pearson相关系数和Bland-Altman图用于评估US和其他两种模式之间的一致性。结果:63对US和MR/CT检查被评估US- for和MR/CT- for测量之间的一致性。ICC在US-FOR (ICC = 0.99, p < 0.001)和MR/CT-FOR (ICC = 0.99, p < 0.001)测量中显示出极好的评估间信度。基于US-FOR的平均值(范围)值与MR/CT-FOR相比略微高估(0.51 [0.36-0.68]vs. 0.46[0.34-0.64])。Pearson相关系数显示for指数的高跨模态一致性(r = 0.83, p < 0.001)。Bland-Altman图显示US-FOR和MR/CT-FOR之间具有极好的一致性,偏差为0.05 (95% CI: -0.03至0.13)。结论:与MR/CT-FOR相比,冠状面US-FOR是评估Chiari II患者脑室肿大的可比工具,即使在阴道畸形的情况下也是如此。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Pediatric Neurosurgery
Pediatric Neurosurgery 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
45
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Articles in ''Pediatric Neurosurgery'' strives to publish new information and observations in pediatric neurosurgery and the allied fields of neurology, neuroradiology and neuropathology as they relate to the etiology of neurologic diseases and the operative care of affected patients. In addition to experimental and clinical studies, the journal presents critical reviews which provide the reader with an update on selected topics as well as case histories and reports on advances in methodology and technique. This thought-provoking focus encourages dissemination of information from neurosurgeons and neuroscientists around the world that will be of interest to clinicians and researchers concerned with pediatric, congenital, and developmental diseases of the nervous system.
期刊最新文献
Pediatric Cervical Spine Trauma: Injury Patterns, Diagnosis, and Treatment. Draining Vein Thrombosis of Developmental Venous Anomaly in Sickle Cell Trait Patients: A Case Report and a Literature Review. Neurosurgical Management of Rubinstein-Taybi Syndrome: An Institutional Experience. Management of Pediatric Patient with Multiple Cranial, Intracranial, and Spinal Manifestations of Penttinen Syndrome: A Case Report. Risk Factors for Pediatric Intracranial Neoplasms in the Kids' Inpatient Database.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1