Is the Relationship Between Religiosity and Filial Elder-Care Norms Declining? A Comparison Between Two Middle-Aged Generations.

Pub Date : 2021-01-01 Epub Date: 2021-03-23 DOI:10.1080/15528030.2021.1900021
Woosang Hwang, Joonsik Yoon, Maria T Brown, Merril Silverstein
{"title":"Is the Relationship Between Religiosity and Filial Elder-Care Norms Declining? A Comparison Between Two Middle-Aged Generations.","authors":"Woosang Hwang,&nbsp;Joonsik Yoon,&nbsp;Maria T Brown,&nbsp;Merril Silverstein","doi":"10.1080/15528030.2021.1900021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>We investigated whether religiosity among middle-aged adults in the Baby Boom generation and Generation-X was associated with filial elder-care norms. The sample consisted of 720 Baby Boom and 520 Gen-X respondents participating in the Longitudinal Study of Generations. A cohort-comparative model was devised using data from Baby Boomers in 1994 and Gen-Xers in 2016, when they were 42 and 40 years old, respectively. A three-step latent class modeling technique identified three religious classes in both generations: strongly religious, weakly religious, and doctrinally religious. Weakly religious Baby Boomers and Gen-Xers reported weaker filial elder-care norms than the strongly religious in each generation. No difference in these effects were detected by generation. However, only among Baby Boomers did the doctrinally religious express stronger filial norms, suggesting cross-cohort weakening in how beliefs translate into filial responsibility in the absence of congregational practice. This research opens lines of inquiry that examine long-term effects of adult children's religiosity on the actual provision of assistance to older parents when they face health difficulties.</p>","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/15528030.2021.1900021","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15528030.2021.1900021","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/3/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

We investigated whether religiosity among middle-aged adults in the Baby Boom generation and Generation-X was associated with filial elder-care norms. The sample consisted of 720 Baby Boom and 520 Gen-X respondents participating in the Longitudinal Study of Generations. A cohort-comparative model was devised using data from Baby Boomers in 1994 and Gen-Xers in 2016, when they were 42 and 40 years old, respectively. A three-step latent class modeling technique identified three religious classes in both generations: strongly religious, weakly religious, and doctrinally religious. Weakly religious Baby Boomers and Gen-Xers reported weaker filial elder-care norms than the strongly religious in each generation. No difference in these effects were detected by generation. However, only among Baby Boomers did the doctrinally religious express stronger filial norms, suggesting cross-cohort weakening in how beliefs translate into filial responsibility in the absence of congregational practice. This research opens lines of inquiry that examine long-term effects of adult children's religiosity on the actual provision of assistance to older parents when they face health difficulties.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
宗教性与孝道养老规范的关系是否在下降?中年两代人的比较。
我们调查了婴儿潮一代和x一代中年人的宗教信仰是否与孝顺养老规范有关。样本由参与世代纵向研究的720名婴儿潮一代和520名x一代受访者组成。使用1994年婴儿潮一代和2016年x世代的数据设计了一个队列比较模型,当时他们分别为42岁和40岁。一种三步潜类建模技术确定了两代人中的三个宗教类别:强烈宗教、弱宗教和教义宗教。宗教信仰较弱的婴儿潮一代和x一代报告说,每一代人的孝顺养老规范都比宗教信仰较强的人弱。在这些影响中,没有发现代际差异。然而,只有在婴儿潮一代中,教义上的宗教表达了更强的孝道规范,这表明在缺乏会众实践的情况下,信仰如何转化为孝道责任的跨群体弱化。这项研究开辟了一条探究线,考察成年子女的宗教信仰对老年父母面临健康困难时实际提供援助的长期影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1