Short-Term Hip Fracture Outcomes during the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Pub Date : 2022-01-17 eCollection Date: 2022-01-01 DOI:10.1055/s-0041-1741511
Samuel Walters, Hassan Raja, Rachel Ahmad, Konstantinos Tsitskaris
{"title":"Short-Term Hip Fracture Outcomes during the COVID-19 Pandemic.","authors":"Samuel Walters,&nbsp;Hassan Raja,&nbsp;Rachel Ahmad,&nbsp;Konstantinos Tsitskaris","doi":"10.1055/s-0041-1741511","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Introduction</b>  Despite many significant changes as a result of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, and reductions in overall trauma workload, patients with fragility hip fractures continued to present to hospital. As we plan for ongoing service provision during future waves of the pandemic, valuable lessons can be learned from patients that have been treated surgically during the \"first wave.\" <b>Methods</b>  All patients admitted to our center (a busy District General Hospital in London, United Kingdom) with a hip fracture during a 13-week period representing the initial rise (\"United Kingdom first wave\") in COVID-19 cases, from February 17 <sup>th</sup> to May 17 <sup>th</sup> , 2020 (study group) were compared with hip fracture patients from the equivalent 13-week period in February to May 2019 (control group). The primary outcome was 30-day mortality, and additional information was collected in terms of length of stay (LOS), SARS-CoV-2 antigen testing, and cause of death. <b>Results</b>  During the COVID-19 study period, 69 patients were admitted with a hip fracture, compared with 70 patients in the control group ( <i>p</i>  = 0.949). There was no significant difference in 30-day mortality between the two groups (5.8 vs. 7.1%, <i>p</i>  = 0.747). Mean LOS was shorter in the COVID-19 period compared with the control group (11.6 vs. 19.6 days, <i>p</i> <0.001, effect size 0.572). Forty-six patients (66.7%) had a SARS-CoV-2 antigen swab test, as testing was not available in the early period, and 10 patients (14.5%) tested positive. None of the patients, who presented before the antigen testing was available, had clinical suspicion of COVID-19 retrospectively. Two \"COVID-19 positive\" patients (20%) died within 30 days of admission. <b>Conclusion</b>  We report reassuring short-term results demonstrating no statistically significant difference in the 30-day mortality rate of hip fracture patients admitted during the United Kingdom's first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic compared to the equivalent period in the previous year. Hip fracture incidence remained stable, and LOS was reduced, likely due to recent departmental changes as well as a drive to discharge patients quickly during the pandemic. We agree with existing reports that elderly hip fracture patients with COVID-19 have a higher risk of perioperative mortality, however, our results suggest that overall mortality for the whole hip fracture population was similar to the previous year, in which deaths were more commonly attributed to respiratory infections associated with other pathogens. Further work may be needed to evaluate the outcomes during subsequent waves of the pandemic as mutations in the virus and conditions may affect outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-01-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8763468/pdf/","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0041-1741511","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Introduction  Despite many significant changes as a result of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, and reductions in overall trauma workload, patients with fragility hip fractures continued to present to hospital. As we plan for ongoing service provision during future waves of the pandemic, valuable lessons can be learned from patients that have been treated surgically during the "first wave." Methods  All patients admitted to our center (a busy District General Hospital in London, United Kingdom) with a hip fracture during a 13-week period representing the initial rise ("United Kingdom first wave") in COVID-19 cases, from February 17 th to May 17 th , 2020 (study group) were compared with hip fracture patients from the equivalent 13-week period in February to May 2019 (control group). The primary outcome was 30-day mortality, and additional information was collected in terms of length of stay (LOS), SARS-CoV-2 antigen testing, and cause of death. Results  During the COVID-19 study period, 69 patients were admitted with a hip fracture, compared with 70 patients in the control group ( p  = 0.949). There was no significant difference in 30-day mortality between the two groups (5.8 vs. 7.1%, p  = 0.747). Mean LOS was shorter in the COVID-19 period compared with the control group (11.6 vs. 19.6 days, p <0.001, effect size 0.572). Forty-six patients (66.7%) had a SARS-CoV-2 antigen swab test, as testing was not available in the early period, and 10 patients (14.5%) tested positive. None of the patients, who presented before the antigen testing was available, had clinical suspicion of COVID-19 retrospectively. Two "COVID-19 positive" patients (20%) died within 30 days of admission. Conclusion  We report reassuring short-term results demonstrating no statistically significant difference in the 30-day mortality rate of hip fracture patients admitted during the United Kingdom's first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic compared to the equivalent period in the previous year. Hip fracture incidence remained stable, and LOS was reduced, likely due to recent departmental changes as well as a drive to discharge patients quickly during the pandemic. We agree with existing reports that elderly hip fracture patients with COVID-19 have a higher risk of perioperative mortality, however, our results suggest that overall mortality for the whole hip fracture population was similar to the previous year, in which deaths were more commonly attributed to respiratory infections associated with other pathogens. Further work may be needed to evaluate the outcomes during subsequent waves of the pandemic as mutations in the virus and conditions may affect outcomes.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
COVID-19大流行期间髋部骨折的短期结局。
尽管2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)大流行带来了许多重大变化,并且总体创伤工作量有所减少,但脆性髋部骨折患者仍继续住院。当我们计划在未来的大流行浪潮中继续提供服务时,可以从在“第一波”期间接受手术治疗的患者身上吸取宝贵的经验教训。方法将2020年2月17日至5月17日(研究组)我们中心(英国伦敦一家繁忙的地区综合医院)收治的所有在2019年2月17日至5月17日的13周期间(“英国第一波”)发生的2019年COVID-19病例首次上升(“英国第一波”)的髋部骨折患者与2019年2月至5月的13周期间(对照组)的髋部骨折患者进行比较。主要终点是30天死亡率,并收集了住院时间(LOS)、SARS-CoV-2抗原检测和死亡原因方面的额外信息。结果在新冠肺炎研究期间,69例患者髋部骨折入院,对照组为70例(p = 0.949)。两组30天死亡率无显著差异(5.8% vs. 7.1%, p = 0.747)。与对照组相比,COVID-19期间的平均LOS较短(11.6天对19.6天)。结论我们报告了令人放心的短期结果,表明在英国第一波COVID-19大流行期间入院的髋部骨折患者的30天死亡率与前一年同期相比没有统计学上的显着差异。髋部骨折发生率保持稳定,LOS减少,这可能是由于最近的部门变动以及大流行期间患者快速出院的驱动。我们同意现有的报道,即老年髋部骨折患者感染COVID-19的围手术期死亡率更高,然而,我们的研究结果表明,整个髋部骨折患者的总死亡率与前一年相似,其中死亡更常见的原因是与其他病原体相关的呼吸道感染。由于病毒和条件的突变可能影响结果,可能需要进一步开展工作来评估大流行随后几波期间的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1