Assessing knowledge, attitude, and practices of veterinarians towards antimicrobial use and stewardship as drivers of inappropriate use in Abuja, Nigeria.

Mabel Kamweli Aworh, Jacob Kwada Paghi Kwaga, Emmanuel Chukwudi Okolocha
{"title":"Assessing knowledge, attitude, and practices of veterinarians towards antimicrobial use and stewardship as drivers of inappropriate use in Abuja, Nigeria.","authors":"Mabel Kamweli Aworh, Jacob Kwada Paghi Kwaga, Emmanuel Chukwudi Okolocha","doi":"10.1186/s42522-021-00058-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) has recently gained worldwide recognition, as the emergence of multi-drug resistant organisms has led to increased mortality and economic burden. This study aimed to assess knowledge, attitudes, and practices of veterinarians towards rational antimicrobial prescribing and identify factors influencing use.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We interviewed veterinary doctors in Abuja, Nigeria using a 50-point questionnaire distributed via WhatsApp mobile application. The questionnaire inquired about their experiences, knowledge, attitudes, and practices towards AMR and stewardship. We analyzed the data by calculating frequencies and proportions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 220 registered veterinarians, 144 (65.5%) participated in the survey. Most (52.8%) were within the age group 30 - 39 years; males (72.2%), with a Master's degree (42.4%) and worked in public service (44.4%). Three-quarters (75.7%) had good knowledge of antimicrobials; 47.2% had received training on stewardship while 88.9% reported that they believed that overuse of antimicrobials was the major contributory factor towards AMR. Antimicrobial stewardship regulations are important in veterinary practice. Veterinarians were aware of the occurrence of resistant pathogens and agreed that restricting antimicrobial use in animal health care was necessary to reduce AMR.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Most respondents referred to the veterinary formulary (VF) when in doubt of the appropriate antimicrobial agent to administer. We recommend that the VF be updated following the WHO list of critically-important-antimicrobials (CIA) and veterinarians educated not to use these CIAs in the treatment of food animals.</p>","PeriodicalId":19490,"journal":{"name":"One Health Outlook","volume":"3 1","pages":"25"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8690525/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"One Health Outlook","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s42522-021-00058-3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) has recently gained worldwide recognition, as the emergence of multi-drug resistant organisms has led to increased mortality and economic burden. This study aimed to assess knowledge, attitudes, and practices of veterinarians towards rational antimicrobial prescribing and identify factors influencing use.

Methods: We interviewed veterinary doctors in Abuja, Nigeria using a 50-point questionnaire distributed via WhatsApp mobile application. The questionnaire inquired about their experiences, knowledge, attitudes, and practices towards AMR and stewardship. We analyzed the data by calculating frequencies and proportions.

Results: Of 220 registered veterinarians, 144 (65.5%) participated in the survey. Most (52.8%) were within the age group 30 - 39 years; males (72.2%), with a Master's degree (42.4%) and worked in public service (44.4%). Three-quarters (75.7%) had good knowledge of antimicrobials; 47.2% had received training on stewardship while 88.9% reported that they believed that overuse of antimicrobials was the major contributory factor towards AMR. Antimicrobial stewardship regulations are important in veterinary practice. Veterinarians were aware of the occurrence of resistant pathogens and agreed that restricting antimicrobial use in animal health care was necessary to reduce AMR.

Conclusion: Most respondents referred to the veterinary formulary (VF) when in doubt of the appropriate antimicrobial agent to administer. We recommend that the VF be updated following the WHO list of critically-important-antimicrobials (CIA) and veterinarians educated not to use these CIAs in the treatment of food animals.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估尼日利亚阿布贾兽医对抗菌药使用和管理的知识、态度和做法,以及不当使用抗菌药的驱动因素。
导言:抗菌药耐药性(AMR)最近得到了全世界的认可,因为耐多药生物的出现导致死亡率和经济负担增加。本研究旨在评估兽医对合理开具抗菌药处方的认识、态度和做法,并确定影响抗菌药使用的因素:我们通过 WhatsApp 移动应用程序分发了一份 50 分问卷,对尼日利亚阿布贾的兽医进行了采访。问卷调查了他们在 AMR 和监管方面的经验、知识、态度和实践。我们通过计算频率和比例对数据进行了分析:在 220 名注册兽医中,144 人(65.5%)参与了调查。大多数(52.8%)年龄在 30 - 39 岁之间;男性(72.2%),拥有硕士学位(42.4%),在公共服务部门工作(44.4%)。四分之三(75.7%)的受访者对抗菌药物有较好的了解;47.2%的受访者接受过抗菌药物管理培训,88.9%的受访者认为过度使用抗菌药物是导致AMR的主要因素。抗菌药物管理条例在兽医实践中非常重要。兽医意识到耐药病原体的发生,并同意在动物保健中限制抗菌药物的使用对于减少AMR是必要的:大多数受访者在对使用何种抗菌剂有疑问时都会参考兽医处方集(VF)。我们建议根据世界卫生组织的极重要抗菌药物(CIA)清单更新兽医处方集,并教育兽医在治疗食用动物时不要使用这些CIA。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Global One Health post-graduate programmes: a review The impact of controlling diseases of significant global importance on greenhouse gas emissions from livestock production The One Health High-Level Expert Panel (OHHLEP) Drug resistance and extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBLs) - producing Enterobacteriaceae, Acinetobacter and Pseudomonas species from the views of one-health approach in Ethiopia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Pillars for successful operationalization of one health as an ecosystem approach: experience from a human-animal interface in the Maasai steppe in Tanzania.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1