Exploration of prescribing error reporting across primary care: a qualitative study.

IF 4.7 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS ACS Applied Bio Materials Pub Date : 2022-01-25 DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2021-050283
Nicola Hall, Kathryn Bullen, John Sherwood, Nicola Wake, Scott Wilkes, Gemma Donovan
{"title":"Exploration of prescribing error reporting across primary care: a qualitative study.","authors":"Nicola Hall, Kathryn Bullen, John Sherwood, Nicola Wake, Scott Wilkes, Gemma Donovan","doi":"10.1136/bmjopen-2021-050283","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To explore barriers and facilitators to prescribing error reporting across primary care.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Qualitative semi-structured face-to-face and telephone interviews were conducted to explore facilitators and barriers to reporting prescribing errors. Data collection and thematic analysis were informed by the COM-B model of behaviour change. Framework analysis was used for coding and charting the data with the assistance of NVivo software (V.12). General and context specific influences on prescribing error reporting were mapped to constructs from the COM-B model (ie, capability, opportunity and motivation).</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Primary care organisations, including community pharmacy, general practice and community care from North East England.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>We interviewed a maximal variation purposive sample of 25 participants, including prescribers, community pharmacists and key stakeholders with primary care or medicines safety roles at local, regional and national levels.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our findings describe a range of factors that influence the capability, opportunity and motivation to report prescribing errors in primary care. Three key contextual factors are also highlighted that were found to underpin many of the behavioural influences on reporting in this setting: the nature of prescribing; heterogeneous priorities for error reporting across and within different primary care organisations; and the complex infrastructure of reporting and learning pathways across primary care. Findings suggest that there is a lack of consistency in how, when and by whom, prescribing errors are reported across primary care.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Further research is needed to identify cross-organisational and interprofessional consensus on agreed reporting thresholds and how best to facilitate a more collaborative approach to reporting and learning, that is, sensitive to the needs and priorities of disparate organisations across primary care. Despite acknowledged challenges, there may be potential for an increased role of community pharmacy in prescribing error reporting to support future learning.</p>","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":" ","pages":"e050283"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/c6/53/bmjopen-2021-050283.PMC8796229.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-050283","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To explore barriers and facilitators to prescribing error reporting across primary care.

Design: Qualitative semi-structured face-to-face and telephone interviews were conducted to explore facilitators and barriers to reporting prescribing errors. Data collection and thematic analysis were informed by the COM-B model of behaviour change. Framework analysis was used for coding and charting the data with the assistance of NVivo software (V.12). General and context specific influences on prescribing error reporting were mapped to constructs from the COM-B model (ie, capability, opportunity and motivation).

Setting: Primary care organisations, including community pharmacy, general practice and community care from North East England.

Participants: We interviewed a maximal variation purposive sample of 25 participants, including prescribers, community pharmacists and key stakeholders with primary care or medicines safety roles at local, regional and national levels.

Results: Our findings describe a range of factors that influence the capability, opportunity and motivation to report prescribing errors in primary care. Three key contextual factors are also highlighted that were found to underpin many of the behavioural influences on reporting in this setting: the nature of prescribing; heterogeneous priorities for error reporting across and within different primary care organisations; and the complex infrastructure of reporting and learning pathways across primary care. Findings suggest that there is a lack of consistency in how, when and by whom, prescribing errors are reported across primary care.

Conclusions: Further research is needed to identify cross-organisational and interprofessional consensus on agreed reporting thresholds and how best to facilitate a more collaborative approach to reporting and learning, that is, sensitive to the needs and priorities of disparate organisations across primary care. Despite acknowledged challenges, there may be potential for an increased role of community pharmacy in prescribing error reporting to support future learning.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
探索基层医疗机构的处方错误报告:一项定性研究。
目的:探讨基层医疗机构报告处方错误的障碍和促进因素:探讨基层医疗机构报告处方错误的障碍和促进因素:设计:进行了半结构化定性面对面访谈和电话访谈,以探讨报告处方错误的促进因素和障碍。数据收集和主题分析参考了行为改变的 COM-B 模型。在 NVivo 软件(V.12)的帮助下,采用框架分析法对数据进行编码和制图。根据 COM-B 模型(即能力、机会和动机)对处方错误报告的一般影响因素和特定环境影响因素进行了映射:环境:基层医疗机构,包括英格兰东北部的社区药房、全科诊所和社区医疗机构:我们对 25 名参与者进行了最大差异有目的抽样调查,其中包括处方医生、社区药剂师以及在地方、地区和国家层面担任初级医疗或药品安全职务的主要利益相关者:我们的研究结果描述了影响基层医疗机构报告处方错误的能力、机会和动机的一系列因素。我们还强调了三个关键的背景因素,这些因素被认为是在这种情况下影响报告行为的许多因素的基础:处方的性质;不同初级医疗机构之间和内部对错误报告的不同优先级;以及初级医疗机构报告和学习途径的复杂基础设施。研究结果表明,基层医疗机构在如何报告、何时报告以及由谁报告处方错误方面缺乏一致性:结论:需要开展进一步研究,以确定跨组织和跨专业的共识,即一致同意的报告阈值,以及如何以最佳方式促进更具协作性的报告和学习方法,即对初级医疗中不同组织的需求和优先事项保持敏感。尽管存在公认的挑战,但社区药房仍有可能在处方错误报告方面发挥更大的作用,以支持未来的学习。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
ACS Applied Bio Materials
ACS Applied Bio Materials Chemistry-Chemistry (all)
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
2.10%
发文量
464
期刊介绍: ACS Applied Bio Materials is an interdisciplinary journal publishing original research covering all aspects of biomaterials and biointerfaces including and beyond the traditional biosensing, biomedical and therapeutic applications. The journal is devoted to reports of new and original experimental and theoretical research of an applied nature that integrates knowledge in the areas of materials, engineering, physics, bioscience, and chemistry into important bio applications. The journal is specifically interested in work that addresses the relationship between structure and function and assesses the stability and degradation of materials under relevant environmental and biological conditions.
期刊最新文献
A Triple-Layer Amniotic Membrane Dressing Drives Robust Wound Healing: In-Depth Protein Profiling and In Vivo Validation in Rat and Human Subjects. Multidimensional Biological Evaluation of Polydopamine-Modified SEBS Gels for Improved Safety. Photoregulated Sequential Chemical Relay via Artificial Nanochannels. Tuning Th1 Immunity through a TLR7/8 Agonist HYBRID2-Formalin-Killed Leishmania donovani Antigen Immunomodulatory System in Visceral Leishmaniasis. Engineered Protein Nanoparticles Enable Targeted Topical Delivery of Upadacitinib for Enhanced Arthritis Therapy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1