A randomized control trial employing infraorbital nerve stimulation as a neural distractor during nasopharyngeal swab.

IF 17.7 1区 化学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Accounts of Chemical Research Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2022-01-28 DOI:10.1177/01455613211069344
Sarah Sussman, Kurren Gill, Sarah Wagoner, Joel Stanek, Ryan Heffelfinger, Howard Krein
{"title":"A randomized control trial employing infraorbital nerve stimulation as a neural distractor during nasopharyngeal swab.","authors":"Sarah Sussman, Kurren Gill, Sarah Wagoner, Joel Stanek, Ryan Heffelfinger, Howard Krein","doi":"10.1177/01455613211069344","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>With the global COVID-19 pandemic, nasopharyngeal swabbing has become commonplace and can occasionally cause discomfort, tearing, and anxiety.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate whether using a neural distraction device during nasopharyngeal swabbing can mitigate patient discomfort.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Participants were randomized into nasal swab with vibration first (treatment-control or Tc) or nasal swab without vibration first (control-treatment or Ct). Then the swab was repeated with the opposite technique. The vibration device was used to stimulate the infraorbital nerve at the midpupillary line, while a nasopharyngeal swab was performed according to CDC protocol. After each swab, participants filled out a survey to assess pain, discomfort, and tearing. This procedure was replicated on the contralateral nostril for a total of 4 swabs and 4 surveys.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty-four subjects were included in the analysis. In the Ct group, there was a median 1.0-point decrease in pain with the use of vibration (95% CI [-1.8, -0.3]<u>,</u> <i>P</i> = 0.0117), 2.5-point decrease (95% CI [-3.0, -0.8], <i>P</i> = 00039) in discomfort, and a 1.0-point decrease (95% CI [-2.6, -0.2] <i>P</i> = 0.0303) in tearing when the vibratory device was used. In the Tc group, there was a median 2.0-point decrease in pain with vibration (95% CI [ -2.7, -1.1], <i>P</i> < 0.0001), 2.3-point decrease in discomfort (95% CI [-3.1, -1.5], <i>P</i> < 0.0001), and a 1.5-point decrease in tearing (95% CI [-2.5, -0.5], <i>P</i> = 0.0037) when vibration was used.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Vibratory stimulation of the infraorbital nerve is safe and effectively reduced pain, discomfort, and tearing during nasopharyngeal swab. Vibration is a reasonable option to minimize patient discomfort during COVID-19 or other microbiological testing.</p>","PeriodicalId":1,"journal":{"name":"Accounts of Chemical Research","volume":" ","pages":"NP560-NP566"},"PeriodicalIF":17.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounts of Chemical Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/01455613211069344","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/1/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: With the global COVID-19 pandemic, nasopharyngeal swabbing has become commonplace and can occasionally cause discomfort, tearing, and anxiety.

Objective: To evaluate whether using a neural distraction device during nasopharyngeal swabbing can mitigate patient discomfort.

Methods: Participants were randomized into nasal swab with vibration first (treatment-control or Tc) or nasal swab without vibration first (control-treatment or Ct). Then the swab was repeated with the opposite technique. The vibration device was used to stimulate the infraorbital nerve at the midpupillary line, while a nasopharyngeal swab was performed according to CDC protocol. After each swab, participants filled out a survey to assess pain, discomfort, and tearing. This procedure was replicated on the contralateral nostril for a total of 4 swabs and 4 surveys.

Results: Thirty-four subjects were included in the analysis. In the Ct group, there was a median 1.0-point decrease in pain with the use of vibration (95% CI [-1.8, -0.3], P = 0.0117), 2.5-point decrease (95% CI [-3.0, -0.8], P = 00039) in discomfort, and a 1.0-point decrease (95% CI [-2.6, -0.2] P = 0.0303) in tearing when the vibratory device was used. In the Tc group, there was a median 2.0-point decrease in pain with vibration (95% CI [ -2.7, -1.1], P < 0.0001), 2.3-point decrease in discomfort (95% CI [-3.1, -1.5], P < 0.0001), and a 1.5-point decrease in tearing (95% CI [-2.5, -0.5], P = 0.0037) when vibration was used.

Conclusion: Vibratory stimulation of the infraorbital nerve is safe and effectively reduced pain, discomfort, and tearing during nasopharyngeal swab. Vibration is a reasonable option to minimize patient discomfort during COVID-19 or other microbiological testing.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在鼻咽拭子试验中使用眶下神经刺激作为神经分散剂的随机对照试验。
简介:随着 COVID-19 在全球范围内的流行,鼻咽部拭抹已成为一种普遍现象,偶尔会引起不适、流泪和焦虑:评估在鼻咽部拭抹时使用神经分散装置是否能减轻患者的不适感:方法:受试者被随机分为先用振动进行鼻腔拭子检查(治疗-对照或 Tc)或先不用电振进行鼻腔拭子检查(对照-治疗或 Ct)。然后用相反的技术重复拭抹。振动装置用于刺激瞳孔中线处的眶下神经,而鼻咽拭子则按照疾病预防控制中心的方案进行。每次拭抹后,参与者都要填写一份调查表,以评估疼痛、不适和撕裂感。这一过程在对侧鼻孔重复进行,共进行 4 次咽拭和 4 次调查:共有 34 名受试者参与分析。在 Ct 组,使用振动装置后,疼痛感中位数下降了 1.0 分(95% CI [-1.8, -0.3],P = 0.0117),不适感下降了 2.5 分(95% CI [-3.0, -0.8],P = 00039),撕裂感下降了 1.0 分(95% CI [-2.6, -0.2],P = 0.0303)。在 Tc 组中,使用振动装置时,疼痛感中位数下降 2.0 分(95% CI [ -2.7,-1.1],P <0.0001),不适感下降 2.3 分(95% CI [-3.1,-1.5],P <0.0001),撕裂感下降 1.5 分(95% CI [-2.5,-0.5],P =0.0037):结论:振动刺激眶下神经是安全的,能有效减轻鼻咽拭子时的疼痛、不适和流泪。在 COVID-19 或其他微生物检验过程中,振动是减少患者不适感的合理选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Accounts of Chemical Research
Accounts of Chemical Research 化学-化学综合
CiteScore
31.40
自引率
1.10%
发文量
312
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Accounts of Chemical Research presents short, concise and critical articles offering easy-to-read overviews of basic research and applications in all areas of chemistry and biochemistry. These short reviews focus on research from the author’s own laboratory and are designed to teach the reader about a research project. In addition, Accounts of Chemical Research publishes commentaries that give an informed opinion on a current research problem. Special Issues online are devoted to a single topic of unusual activity and significance. Accounts of Chemical Research replaces the traditional article abstract with an article "Conspectus." These entries synopsize the research affording the reader a closer look at the content and significance of an article. Through this provision of a more detailed description of the article contents, the Conspectus enhances the article's discoverability by search engines and the exposure for the research.
期刊最新文献
Electrochemical Control of Fluorescence Emission: From Intensity Modulation to Single Molecule Switching for Applications in Light Microscopy. Ordering Covalent–Organic Frameworks toward Next-Generation Nanofiltration Molecular-Level Decoding of Electron Transfer Dynamics in Metal Nanoclusters Ultraconformal Carbon-Based Biointerfacing Electrodes for Cognition Study. Theoretical Insights on the Regulatory Mechanisms of Structure and Doping on the Photoluminescence of Ligand Protected Gold Nanoclusters
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1