Nasal insertion overall satisfaction with EUS-b (NOSE): evaluating the feasibility of transnasal diagnostic EUS-b.

IF 1.8 Q3 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM Advances in respiratory medicine Pub Date : 2022-02-01 DOI:10.5603/ARM.a2022.0023
Gonçalo Samouco, Michele de Santis, Paulo Matos, Lourdes Barradas
{"title":"Nasal insertion overall satisfaction with EUS-b (NOSE): evaluating the feasibility of transnasal diagnostic EUS-b.","authors":"Gonçalo Samouco, Michele de Santis, Paulo Matos, Lourdes Barradas","doi":"10.5603/ARM.a2022.0023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Esophageal endoscopic ultrasound using an endobronchial ultrasound (EBUS) bronchoscope (EUS‑b) has become an important tool in many bronchoscopy units. The procedure is generally performed through the mouth and there are currently no studies published evaluating the feasibility of transnasal EUS-b nor comparing it to the transoral approach. We aimed to evaluate the technical feasibility, patient comfort and safety of transnasal EUS-b.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>A single-centre prospective study enrolling patients undergoing diagnostic EUS-b was conducted. Nasal insertion was attempted in all cases. Procedure difficulty and perceived patient's comfort were reported by the bronchoscopists. Comfort, overall satisfaction and willingness to repeat the procedure were reported by the patients. Data regarding demographics, procedure details, patients' comfort and overall satisfaction, histological analysis and final diagnosis were collected and analysed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 119 patients were consecutively enrolled. Nasal insertion was successful in 87.4% and the mean duration of the procedure was 15.7 ± 4.9 minutes. No severe complications were reported. Procedure difficulty was usually graded as \"simple\" or \"very simple\" (71.4%). Mean values for bronchoscopists' assessment of patient comfort and patients' reported comfort were 4.2 and 4.1, respectively, on a 5-point scale. Only moderate correlation between these values was found (τb = 0.301, P = 0.001). Willingness to repeat transnasal EUS-b was very high (99.0%). Adequate samples were obtained in 88.5% of patients and overall diagnostic yield of EUS‑b needle aspiration was 85.9%.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>EUS-b is an effective procedure that can be performed safely through the nasal cavity without significant discomfort for the patient.</p>","PeriodicalId":7391,"journal":{"name":"Advances in respiratory medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in respiratory medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5603/ARM.a2022.0023","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Esophageal endoscopic ultrasound using an endobronchial ultrasound (EBUS) bronchoscope (EUS‑b) has become an important tool in many bronchoscopy units. The procedure is generally performed through the mouth and there are currently no studies published evaluating the feasibility of transnasal EUS-b nor comparing it to the transoral approach. We aimed to evaluate the technical feasibility, patient comfort and safety of transnasal EUS-b.

Material and methods: A single-centre prospective study enrolling patients undergoing diagnostic EUS-b was conducted. Nasal insertion was attempted in all cases. Procedure difficulty and perceived patient's comfort were reported by the bronchoscopists. Comfort, overall satisfaction and willingness to repeat the procedure were reported by the patients. Data regarding demographics, procedure details, patients' comfort and overall satisfaction, histological analysis and final diagnosis were collected and analysed.

Results: A total of 119 patients were consecutively enrolled. Nasal insertion was successful in 87.4% and the mean duration of the procedure was 15.7 ± 4.9 minutes. No severe complications were reported. Procedure difficulty was usually graded as "simple" or "very simple" (71.4%). Mean values for bronchoscopists' assessment of patient comfort and patients' reported comfort were 4.2 and 4.1, respectively, on a 5-point scale. Only moderate correlation between these values was found (τb = 0.301, P = 0.001). Willingness to repeat transnasal EUS-b was very high (99.0%). Adequate samples were obtained in 88.5% of patients and overall diagnostic yield of EUS‑b needle aspiration was 85.9%.

Conclusions: EUS-b is an effective procedure that can be performed safely through the nasal cavity without significant discomfort for the patient.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
鼻腔插入 EUS-b(NOSE)的总体满意度:评估经鼻诊断 EUS-b 的可行性。
简介使用支气管内超声(EBUS)支气管镜(EUS-b)进行食道内窥镜超声检查已成为许多支气管镜检查单位的重要工具。该手术一般通过口腔进行,目前还没有研究对经鼻 EUS-b 的可行性进行评估,也没有将其与经口方法进行比较。我们旨在评估经鼻 EUS-b 的技术可行性、患者舒适度和安全性:我们进行了一项单中心前瞻性研究,纳入了接受 EUS-b 诊断的患者。所有病例均尝试鼻腔插入。支气管镜医师报告了手术难度和患者的舒适度。患者报告了舒适度、总体满意度和重复手术的意愿。收集并分析了有关人口统计学、手术细节、患者舒适度和总体满意度、组织学分析和最终诊断的数据:结果:共有 119 名患者连续接受了手术。87.4%的患者成功插入鼻腔,平均手术时间为(15.7 ± 4.9)分钟。无严重并发症报告。手术难度通常被评为 "简单 "或 "非常简单"(71.4%)。支气管镜医师对患者舒适度的评估和患者报告的舒适度平均值分别为 4.2 和 4.1(5 分制)。这些数值之间仅存在中度相关性(τb = 0.301,P = 0.001)。重复经鼻 EUS-b 的意愿非常高(99.0%)。88.5%的患者获得了足够的样本,EUS-b针吸术的总体诊断率为85.9%:EUS-b 是一种有效的手术,可通过鼻腔安全进行,患者不会感到明显不适。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Advances in respiratory medicine
Advances in respiratory medicine RESPIRATORY SYSTEM-
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
90
期刊介绍: "Advances in Respiratory Medicine" is a new international title for "Pneumonologia i Alergologia Polska", edited bimonthly and addressed to respiratory professionals. The Journal contains peer-reviewed original research papers, short communications, case-reports, recommendations of the Polish Respiratory Society concerning the diagnosis and treatment of lung diseases, editorials, postgraduate education articles, letters and book reviews in the field of pneumonology, allergology, oncology, immunology and infectious diseases. "Advances in Respiratory Medicine" is an open access, official journal of Polish Society of Lung Diseases, Polish Society of Allergology and National Research Institute of Tuberculosis and Lung Diseases.
期刊最新文献
Expression of Epithelial Alarmin Receptor on Innate Lymphoid Cells Type 2 in Eosinophilic Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease. Utility of Raman Spectroscopy in Pulmonary Medicine. Secure and Transparent Lung and Colon Cancer Classification Using Blockchain and Microsoft Azure. Comparing the Effects of Two Surfactant Administration Methods: Minimally Invasive Surfactant Therapy (MIST) with Intubation (INSURE) in Infants with Respiratory Distress Syndrome. The Impact of Different Telerehabilitation Methods on Peripheral Muscle Strength and Aerobic Capacity in COPD Patients: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1