The Effect of Education and Motivational Interviewing on COPD Management and Outcome Parameters in COPD Patients.

IF 0.8 Q4 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM Turkish Thoracic Journal Pub Date : 2021-09-01 DOI:10.5152/TurkThoracJ.2021.0004
Derya Tülüce, Nurdan Köktürk, Bahadır Geniş, Aycan Kayalar, Nermin Gürhan, Sevinç Kutlutürkan
{"title":"The Effect of Education and Motivational Interviewing on COPD Management and Outcome Parameters in COPD Patients.","authors":"Derya Tülüce,&nbsp;Nurdan Köktürk,&nbsp;Bahadır Geniş,&nbsp;Aycan Kayalar,&nbsp;Nermin Gürhan,&nbsp;Sevinç Kutlutürkan","doi":"10.5152/TurkThoracJ.2021.0004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is an important health problem. The disease management consists of avoiding risk factors, therapy for maintenance of disease stability, and prevention and treatment of exacerbations. Patient education and motivational interviewing are thought to be effective approaches in disease management. This study aimed to investigate the effects of repeated education and motivational interviewing conducted by a multidisciplinary team, and the outcomes in COPD patients.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>This was a randomized controlled study. The study included 40 COPD patients (21 cases and 19 controls) hospitalized for exacerbation of COPD between June 2015 and June 2017. The patients were randomized in a ratio of 1 : 1 based on age, gender, and socioeconomic status. After a baseline assessment for all patients, patients in the study group were subjected to a total of 3 educational sessions and 4 motivational interview sessions through intermittent invitations over a period of one year. At the end of the first year, baseline assessment tests, the technique of drug use, the number of moderate/severe COPD exacerbations, and mortality status were evaluated for all patients.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was no difference between the groups in terms of age, gender, and pulmonary function tests (FEV1%, FEV1/FVC) and partial oxygen and carbon dioxide pressures (pO2 and pCO2). At the end of the 12 months, there was a statistically significant difference between the groups in terms of the levels of theoretical knowledge of COPD and the Morisky scale scores. All patients in the study group survived, whereas 4 patients died in the control group, with a statistically significant difference between the 2 groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>One-to-one education and motivational interviews (MI) on COPD, which are based on a multidisciplinary approach, are proposed, because they increase the level of knowledge of the disease and adherence to treatment, and have positive effects on mortality rates.</p>","PeriodicalId":37452,"journal":{"name":"Turkish Thoracic Journal","volume":"22 5","pages":"399-406"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8975327/pdf/ttj-22-5-399.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Turkish Thoracic Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5152/TurkThoracJ.2021.0004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is an important health problem. The disease management consists of avoiding risk factors, therapy for maintenance of disease stability, and prevention and treatment of exacerbations. Patient education and motivational interviewing are thought to be effective approaches in disease management. This study aimed to investigate the effects of repeated education and motivational interviewing conducted by a multidisciplinary team, and the outcomes in COPD patients.

Material and methods: This was a randomized controlled study. The study included 40 COPD patients (21 cases and 19 controls) hospitalized for exacerbation of COPD between June 2015 and June 2017. The patients were randomized in a ratio of 1 : 1 based on age, gender, and socioeconomic status. After a baseline assessment for all patients, patients in the study group were subjected to a total of 3 educational sessions and 4 motivational interview sessions through intermittent invitations over a period of one year. At the end of the first year, baseline assessment tests, the technique of drug use, the number of moderate/severe COPD exacerbations, and mortality status were evaluated for all patients.

Results: There was no difference between the groups in terms of age, gender, and pulmonary function tests (FEV1%, FEV1/FVC) and partial oxygen and carbon dioxide pressures (pO2 and pCO2). At the end of the 12 months, there was a statistically significant difference between the groups in terms of the levels of theoretical knowledge of COPD and the Morisky scale scores. All patients in the study group survived, whereas 4 patients died in the control group, with a statistically significant difference between the 2 groups.

Conclusion: One-to-one education and motivational interviews (MI) on COPD, which are based on a multidisciplinary approach, are proposed, because they increase the level of knowledge of the disease and adherence to treatment, and have positive effects on mortality rates.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
教育和动机性访谈对COPD患者COPD管理和结局参数的影响。
目的:慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)是一个重要的健康问题。疾病管理包括避免危险因素、维持疾病稳定的治疗以及预防和治疗恶化。患者教育和动机访谈被认为是疾病管理的有效方法。本研究旨在探讨由多学科团队进行的反复教育和动机访谈的效果及其在COPD患者中的预后。材料与方法:本研究为随机对照研究。该研究包括2015年6月至2017年6月期间因COPD加重住院的40例COPD患者(21例和19例对照)。患者根据年龄、性别和社会经济地位按1:1的比例随机分组。在对所有患者进行基线评估后,研究组的患者在一年的时间里通过间歇性邀请接受了总共3次教育课程和4次动机访谈课程。在第一年结束时,对所有患者的基线评估测试、药物使用技术、中度/重度COPD恶化次数和死亡率状况进行评估。结果:两组在年龄、性别、肺功能测试(FEV1%、FEV1/FVC)、部分氧气和二氧化碳压力(pO2和pCO2)方面无差异。在12个月结束时,两组在COPD理论知识水平和Morisky评分方面存在统计学差异。研究组患者全部存活,对照组4例死亡,两组比较差异有统计学意义。结论:建议基于多学科方法的COPD一对一教育和动机访谈(MI),因为它们提高了疾病的知识水平和治疗依从性,并对死亡率有积极影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Turkish Thoracic Journal
Turkish Thoracic Journal Medicine-Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
11.10%
发文量
2
期刊介绍: Turkish Thoracic Journal (Turk Thorac J) is the double-blind, peer-reviewed, open access, international publication organ of Turkish Thoracic Society. The journal is a quarterly publication, published on January, April, July, and October and its publication language is English. Turkish Thoracic Journal started its publication life following the merger of two journals which were published under the titles “Turkish Respiratory Journal” and “Toraks Journal” until 2007. Archives of both journals were passed on to the Turkish Thoracic Journal. The aim of the journal is to convey scientific developments and to create a dynamic discussion platform about pulmonary diseases. With this intent, the journal accepts articles from all related scientific areas that address adult and pediatric pulmonary diseases, as well as thoracic imaging, environmental and occupational disorders, intensive care, sleep disorders and thoracic surgery. Clinical and research articles, reviews, statements of agreement or disagreement on controversial issues, national and international consensus reports, abstracts and comments of important international articles, interesting case reports, writings related to clinical and practical applications, letters to the editor, and editorials are accepted.
期刊最新文献
Attitude and Practice Toward Use of Cigarettes and Electronic Cigarettes Among Pregnant Women: A Questionnaire-Based Survey. Should Pneumothorax Developing During the Recovery Period After COVID-19 in Patients with Previously Healthy Lungs be Considered a Primary Spontaneous Pneumothorax or a Secondary Spontaneous Pneumothorax? A Single Center Experience of Super-Responders Among Severe Asthma Patients Receiving Treatment with Mepolizumab. Response to Afatinib in a Common EGFR-Mutated Lung Adenocarcinoma with a Very Rare Combination of Compound Mutations. The Use of High-Flow Nasal Oxygen Therapy in the Management of Severe Acute Exacerbation of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Feasibility Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1