Selecting the special or choosing the common? A high-powered conceptual replication of Kim and Markus' (1999) pen study.

IF 1.8 3区 心理学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL Journal of Social Psychology Pub Date : 2024-03-03 Epub Date: 2022-02-03 DOI:10.1080/00224545.2022.2036670
Tobias Otterbring, Roopali Bhatnagar, Michał Folwarczny
{"title":"Selecting the special or choosing the common? A high-powered conceptual replication of Kim and Markus' (1999) pen study.","authors":"Tobias Otterbring, Roopali Bhatnagar, Michał Folwarczny","doi":"10.1080/00224545.2022.2036670","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Kim and Markus (1999; Study 3) found that 74% of European Americans selected a pen with an uncommon (vs. common) color, whereas only 24% of East Asians made such a choice, highlighting a pronounced cross-cultural difference in the extent to which people opt for originality or make majority-based choices. The present high-powered study (<i>N</i> = 729) conceptually replicates the results from Kim and Markus (1999; Study 3), although our effect size (<i>r</i> = .12) is significantly weaker than that of the original study (<i>r</i> = .52). Interestingly, a larger proportion of Chinese, but not US, participants selected a pen with an uncommon color now than during the original study. Thus, our findings indicate a potential transmission of certain Western values to cultures traditionally characterized by collectivism and conformity, likely exacerbated by the globalization of mass media and the rapid economic growth in many East Asian countries.</p>","PeriodicalId":48205,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Social Psychology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Social Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00224545.2022.2036670","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/2/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Kim and Markus (1999; Study 3) found that 74% of European Americans selected a pen with an uncommon (vs. common) color, whereas only 24% of East Asians made such a choice, highlighting a pronounced cross-cultural difference in the extent to which people opt for originality or make majority-based choices. The present high-powered study (N = 729) conceptually replicates the results from Kim and Markus (1999; Study 3), although our effect size (r = .12) is significantly weaker than that of the original study (r = .52). Interestingly, a larger proportion of Chinese, but not US, participants selected a pen with an uncommon color now than during the original study. Thus, our findings indicate a potential transmission of certain Western values to cultures traditionally characterized by collectivism and conformity, likely exacerbated by the globalization of mass media and the rapid economic growth in many East Asian countries.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
选择特殊还是选择普通?Kim 和 Markus(1999 年)笔头研究的高能概念复制。
Kim和Markus(1999年;研究3)发现,74%的欧洲裔美国人选择了不常见(与常见)颜色的钢笔,而只有24%的东亚裔美国人做出了这样的选择。本项高功率研究(N = 729)在概念上复制了 Kim 和 Markus(1999;研究 3)的结果,尽管我们的效应大小(r = 0.12)明显弱于原始研究(r = 0.52)。有趣的是,与最初的研究相比,现在有更大比例的中国受试者(而非美国受试者)选择了颜色不常见的笔。因此,我们的研究结果表明,某些西方价值观可能会传播到传统上以集体主义和顺从为特征的文化中,而大众传媒的全球化和许多东亚国家经济的快速增长可能会加剧这种传播。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Social Psychology
Journal of Social Psychology PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL-
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
68
期刊介绍: Since John Dewey and Carl Murchison founded it in 1929, The Journal of Social Psychology has published original empirical research in all areas of basic and applied social psychology. Most articles report laboratory or field research in core areas of social and organizational psychology including the self, attribution theory, attitudes, social influence, consumer behavior, decision making, groups and teams, sterotypes and discrimination, interpersonal attraction, prosocial behavior, aggression, organizational behavior, leadership, and cross-cultural studies. Academic experts review all articles to ensure that they meet high standards.
期刊最新文献
The influence of vehicle size on perception and behavior toward drivers. Disease, death, morality, and politics: Pathogen prevalence, terror management, and conservatism as motivated social cognition. Examining the moderating role of regulatory fit on stereotype threat among Ugandan adolescents. Food for thought on eating while meeting virtually. Time for you and for me: compassionate goals predict greater psychological well-being via the perception of time as nonzero-sum resources.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1