Raanan Meyer, Nir Meller, Aya Mohr-Sasson, Shlomo Toussia-Cohen, Ronit Machtinger, Yossi Bart, Roy Mashiach, Gabriel Levin
{"title":"Clinical features of isolated Fallopian tube torsion: evidence from a large series.","authors":"Raanan Meyer, Nir Meller, Aya Mohr-Sasson, Shlomo Toussia-Cohen, Ronit Machtinger, Yossi Bart, Roy Mashiach, Gabriel Levin","doi":"10.1080/14647273.2022.2034056","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>We aimed at studying isolated Fallopian tube torsion (IFTT) in a relatively large cohort of women and to evaluate different features of IFTT in comparison to a large cohort of women with non-IFTT adnexal torsion (NIAT). This was a retrospective cohort study. We included women with surgically confirmed ovarian and/or Fallopian tube torsion between March 2011 and June 2020. Fifty-four cases of IFTT were surgically confirmed during the study period and were compared to 422 surgically confirmed NIAT. The rate of controlled ovarian hyperstimulation treatments, current pregnancy, and vomiting was lower in the IFTT group compared with the NIAT group. Cervical tenderness and vaginal discharge were more common in the IFTT group. Oedematous and enlarged ovaries were less common in the IFTT group. In multivariate regression analysis, the following factors were independently associated with IFTT: (i) vaginal discharge [adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 95% CI 8.16, 1.98-33.55]; (ii) cervical motion tenderness (aOR 95% CI 2.71, 1.01-7.29); (iii) fertility treatments (aOR 95% CI 0.26, 0.70-0.77); (iv) previous abdominal surgery (aOR 95% CI 0.46, 0.22-0.96); (v) vomiting (aOR 95% CI 0.38, 0.19-0.76); and (vi) enlarged ovary (aOR 95% CI 0.34, 0.18-0.65). In conclusion, we have identified factors positively and negatively associated with IFTT in a large cohort of women with adnexal torsion.</p>","PeriodicalId":13006,"journal":{"name":"Human Fertility","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Human Fertility","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14647273.2022.2034056","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/2/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
Abstract
We aimed at studying isolated Fallopian tube torsion (IFTT) in a relatively large cohort of women and to evaluate different features of IFTT in comparison to a large cohort of women with non-IFTT adnexal torsion (NIAT). This was a retrospective cohort study. We included women with surgically confirmed ovarian and/or Fallopian tube torsion between March 2011 and June 2020. Fifty-four cases of IFTT were surgically confirmed during the study period and were compared to 422 surgically confirmed NIAT. The rate of controlled ovarian hyperstimulation treatments, current pregnancy, and vomiting was lower in the IFTT group compared with the NIAT group. Cervical tenderness and vaginal discharge were more common in the IFTT group. Oedematous and enlarged ovaries were less common in the IFTT group. In multivariate regression analysis, the following factors were independently associated with IFTT: (i) vaginal discharge [adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 95% CI 8.16, 1.98-33.55]; (ii) cervical motion tenderness (aOR 95% CI 2.71, 1.01-7.29); (iii) fertility treatments (aOR 95% CI 0.26, 0.70-0.77); (iv) previous abdominal surgery (aOR 95% CI 0.46, 0.22-0.96); (v) vomiting (aOR 95% CI 0.38, 0.19-0.76); and (vi) enlarged ovary (aOR 95% CI 0.34, 0.18-0.65). In conclusion, we have identified factors positively and negatively associated with IFTT in a large cohort of women with adnexal torsion.
期刊介绍:
Human Fertility is a leading international, multidisciplinary journal dedicated to furthering research and promoting good practice in the areas of human fertility and infertility. Topics included span the range from molecular medicine to healthcare delivery, and contributions are welcomed from professionals and academics from the spectrum of disciplines concerned with human fertility. It is published on behalf of the British Fertility Society.
The journal also provides a forum for the publication of peer-reviewed articles arising out of the activities of the Association of Biomedical Andrologists, the Association of Clinical Embryologists, the Association of Irish Clinical Embryologists, the British Andrology Society, the British Infertility Counselling Association, the Irish Fertility Society and the Royal College of Nursing Fertility Nurses Group.
All submissions are welcome. Articles considered include original papers, reviews, policy statements, commentaries, debates, correspondence, and reports of sessions at meetings. The journal also publishes refereed abstracts from the meetings of the constituent organizations.