Comparison of the effect of the pelvic floor muscle biofeedback prior or postradical prostatectomy on urinary incontinence: A randomized controlled trial.

IF 1 Q4 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Turkish journal of urology Pub Date : 2021-09-01 DOI:10.5152/tud.2021.21096
Farzad Allameh, Seyed Mansoor Rayegani, Mohammadreza Razzaghi, Amir Reza Abedi, Amirhossein Rahavian, Atefeh Javadi, Saeed Montazeri
{"title":"Comparison of the effect of the pelvic floor muscle biofeedback prior or postradical prostatectomy on urinary incontinence: A randomized controlled trial.","authors":"Farzad Allameh, Seyed Mansoor Rayegani, Mohammadreza Razzaghi, Amir Reza Abedi, Amirhossein Rahavian, Atefeh Javadi, Saeed Montazeri","doi":"10.5152/tud.2021.21096","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the pre- and postoperative effects of pelvic floor muscle training (PFMT) and the biofeedback method on the management of urinary incontinence (UI) in patients who underwent radical prostatectomy (RP).</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Fifty-seven patients were enrolled in this study from September 2019 to July 2020. They were randomly divided into three groups each of 19 patients: two case groups (biofeedback before and after RP) and a control group. All patients underwent RP, followed by PFMT and 24-hour pad use instructions after the postoperative removal of the Foley catheter. Then, the rate of patient-reported pads/day usage was recorded and compared among the three groups at the end of the 1st, 3rd, and 6th months of catheter removal.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Compared with the control group (only 15%), 63 and 52% of the patients who used pre- or postoperative treatment interventions, respectively, regained urinary continence during the first postoperative period, showing significant downward rates of pads/day use (P ¼ .01 and .001, respectively). However, the results were not significant between the two case groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our study revealed that applying the biofeedback method for pelvic floor muscles could be an efficient interventional approach in patients with UI, leading to the earlier regaining of continence following RP.</p>","PeriodicalId":23366,"journal":{"name":"Turkish journal of urology","volume":"47 5","pages":"436-441"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/ca/68/tju-47-5-436.PMC9612772.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Turkish journal of urology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5152/tud.2021.21096","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the pre- and postoperative effects of pelvic floor muscle training (PFMT) and the biofeedback method on the management of urinary incontinence (UI) in patients who underwent radical prostatectomy (RP).

Material and methods: Fifty-seven patients were enrolled in this study from September 2019 to July 2020. They were randomly divided into three groups each of 19 patients: two case groups (biofeedback before and after RP) and a control group. All patients underwent RP, followed by PFMT and 24-hour pad use instructions after the postoperative removal of the Foley catheter. Then, the rate of patient-reported pads/day usage was recorded and compared among the three groups at the end of the 1st, 3rd, and 6th months of catheter removal.

Results: Compared with the control group (only 15%), 63 and 52% of the patients who used pre- or postoperative treatment interventions, respectively, regained urinary continence during the first postoperative period, showing significant downward rates of pads/day use (P ¼ .01 and .001, respectively). However, the results were not significant between the two case groups.

Conclusion: Our study revealed that applying the biofeedback method for pelvic floor muscles could be an efficient interventional approach in patients with UI, leading to the earlier regaining of continence following RP.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
比较前列腺切除术前或术后盆底肌肉生物反馈对尿失禁的影响:随机对照试验
研究目的本研究旨在评估盆底肌肉训练(PFMT)和生物反馈法对根治性前列腺切除术(RP)患者尿失禁(UI)治疗的术前和术后效果:本研究从2019年9月至2020年7月共招募了57名患者。他们被随机分为三组,每组19人:两组病例组(RP术前和术后生物反馈)和对照组。所有患者均接受 RP 术,术后拔除 Foley 导管后接受 PFMT 和 24 小时护垫使用指导。然后,在拔除导尿管后的第 1、第 3 和第 6 个月末,记录并比较三组患者报告的护垫日使用率:与对照组(仅 15%)相比,使用术前或术后治疗干预的患者中分别有 63% 和 52% 在术后第一阶段恢复了尿失禁,尿垫/天使用率显著下降(P ¼ 分别为 0.01 和 0.001)。然而,两组病例之间的结果并不显著:我们的研究表明,对尿失禁患者应用盆底肌肉生物反馈法是一种有效的干预方法,可使患者在 RP 术后更早地恢复尿失禁。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Turkish journal of urology
Turkish journal of urology Medicine-Urology
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
53
期刊介绍: The aim of the Turkish Journal of Urology is to contribute to the literature by publishing scientifically high-quality research articles as well as reviews, editorials, letters to the editor and case reports. The journal’s target audience includes, urology specialists, medical specialty fellows and other specialists and practitioners who are interested in the field of urology.
期刊最新文献
Infertility as a Proxy of Men's Health: Still a Long Way to Go. General Management of Female Sexual Dysfunction for Urologists. Do Sleep Disorders Influence the Prognosis and the Response to the Therapy in Enuretic Children? Surgical Technique of Glans Wings Creation with Preservation of Glanular Vascular Arcade and Creating Flaps for Tension-Free Glansplasty in Hypospadias Repair. Duloxetine in Reducing Catheter-Related Bladder Discomfort: A Prospective, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1