Treatment of patients with newly diagnosed metastatic hormone sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC) in Belgium: a real world data analysis.

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q2 Medicine Acta Clinica Belgica Pub Date : 2022-12-01 Epub Date: 2021-11-18 DOI:10.1080/17843286.2021.2001999
E Lambert, S Hollebosch, C van Praet, S Van Bruwaene, L Duck, W De Roock, S van Wambeke, C Ghysel, F Ameye, P Schatteman, F Vandenbroucke, B Sautois, F Baekelandt, D Ost, K Fransis, B Filleul, C Remondo, W Wynendaele, B Bamelis, P Logghe, E Vergauwe, E Denies, S Joniau, N Lumen
{"title":"Treatment of patients with newly diagnosed metastatic hormone sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC) in Belgium: a real world data analysis.","authors":"E Lambert,&nbsp;S Hollebosch,&nbsp;C van Praet,&nbsp;S Van Bruwaene,&nbsp;L Duck,&nbsp;W De Roock,&nbsp;S van Wambeke,&nbsp;C Ghysel,&nbsp;F Ameye,&nbsp;P Schatteman,&nbsp;F Vandenbroucke,&nbsp;B Sautois,&nbsp;F Baekelandt,&nbsp;D Ost,&nbsp;K Fransis,&nbsp;B Filleul,&nbsp;C Remondo,&nbsp;W Wynendaele,&nbsp;B Bamelis,&nbsp;P Logghe,&nbsp;E Vergauwe,&nbsp;E Denies,&nbsp;S Joniau,&nbsp;N Lumen","doi":"10.1080/17843286.2021.2001999","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Abiraterone acetate + prednisone (AAP) and docetaxel have proven their efficacy in the treatment of patients with newly diagnosed metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC) in clinical trials. However, real-world data are scarce. The goal of this study is to evaluate real-world data on the efficacy and safety of these therapies in mHSPC patients.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>Records of 93 patients from 21 different centres were retrospectively reviewed. Primary and secondary endpoints were radiographic and PSA progression-free survival (RPFS - PSA-PFS) and cancer specific and overall survival (CSS - OS), respectively. Adverse events (AEs) were evaluated according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 5.0. Differences in oncological outcome and AEs were evaluated between three treatment groups: ADT only (N=26) - ADT + AAP (N=48) - ADT + docetaxel (N=19). Survival analysis was performed using Kaplan-Meier statistics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Median RPFS was 13 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 9-17) for ADT only, 21 months (95% CI: 19-23) for ADT + AAP and 12 months (95% CI: 11-14) for ADT + docetaxel (p = 0.004). The 1-year PSA-PFS, CSS and OS were 73.5%, 90.7% and 88.7%, respectively, with no significant differences between the three groups. Adverse events of grade 3 or higher were not observed more frequently.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Retrospective real-world data show a significantly longer RPFS for mHSPC patients treated with ADT + AAP compared to ADT only or ADT + docetaxel at short-term follow-up. This can aid in counselling of mHSPC patients in daily clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":7086,"journal":{"name":"Acta Clinica Belgica","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Clinica Belgica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17843286.2021.2001999","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/11/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Introduction: Abiraterone acetate + prednisone (AAP) and docetaxel have proven their efficacy in the treatment of patients with newly diagnosed metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC) in clinical trials. However, real-world data are scarce. The goal of this study is to evaluate real-world data on the efficacy and safety of these therapies in mHSPC patients.

Patients and methods: Records of 93 patients from 21 different centres were retrospectively reviewed. Primary and secondary endpoints were radiographic and PSA progression-free survival (RPFS - PSA-PFS) and cancer specific and overall survival (CSS - OS), respectively. Adverse events (AEs) were evaluated according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 5.0. Differences in oncological outcome and AEs were evaluated between three treatment groups: ADT only (N=26) - ADT + AAP (N=48) - ADT + docetaxel (N=19). Survival analysis was performed using Kaplan-Meier statistics.

Results: Median RPFS was 13 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 9-17) for ADT only, 21 months (95% CI: 19-23) for ADT + AAP and 12 months (95% CI: 11-14) for ADT + docetaxel (p = 0.004). The 1-year PSA-PFS, CSS and OS were 73.5%, 90.7% and 88.7%, respectively, with no significant differences between the three groups. Adverse events of grade 3 or higher were not observed more frequently.

Conclusion: Retrospective real-world data show a significantly longer RPFS for mHSPC patients treated with ADT + AAP compared to ADT only or ADT + docetaxel at short-term follow-up. This can aid in counselling of mHSPC patients in daily clinical practice.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
比利时新诊断的转移性激素敏感前列腺癌(mHSPC)患者的治疗:真实世界的数据分析。
简介:在临床试验中,醋酸阿比龙+强的松(AAP)和多西他赛治疗新诊断的转移性激素敏感性前列腺癌(mHSPC)患者的疗效得到了证实。然而,真实世界的数据很少。本研究的目的是评估这些疗法在mHSPC患者中的有效性和安全性的真实数据。患者和方法:回顾性分析来自21个不同中心的93例患者的记录。主要终点和次要终点分别是放射学和PSA无进展生存期(RPFS - PSA- pfs)和癌症特异性和总生存期(CSS - OS)。不良事件(ae)根据不良事件通用术语标准5.0版进行评估。评估三个治疗组之间肿瘤预后和ae的差异:仅ADT (N=26) - ADT + AAP (N=48) - ADT +多西紫杉醇(N=19)。生存分析采用Kaplan-Meier统计。结果:仅ADT的中位RPFS为13个月(95%可信区间[CI]: 9-17), ADT + AAP的中位RPFS为21个月(95% CI: 19-23), ADT +多西他赛的中位RPFS为12个月(95% CI: 11-14) (p = 0.004)。1年PSA-PFS、CSS和OS分别为73.5%、90.7%和88.7%,三组间差异无统计学意义。3级及以上不良事件的发生率不高。结论:现实世界的回顾性数据显示,在短期随访中,ADT + AAP治疗的mHSPC患者的RPFS明显长于单纯ADT或ADT +多西他赛。这可以帮助咨询mHSPC患者在日常临床实践。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Acta Clinica Belgica
Acta Clinica Belgica 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
44
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Acta Clinica Belgica: International Journal of Clinical and Laboratory Medicine primarily publishes papers on clinical medicine, clinical chemistry, pathology and molecular biology, provided they describe results which contribute to our understanding of clinical problems or describe new methods applicable to clinical investigation. Readership includes physicians, pathologists, pharmacists and physicians working in non-academic and academic hospitals, practicing internal medicine and its subspecialties.
期刊最新文献
Enhancing hospital emergency response based on the experience of COVID-19. Herpes zoster in Belgium: a new solution to an old problem. Appropriate use of antibiotics for oral/dental conditions in older adults: a narrative review. Systemic sarcoidosis presenting with hypercalcemia, sinusitis and hypothalamic-pituitary dysfunction. Comparison of time-to-detection of Mindray TDR and BacT/ALERT®3D blood culture systems using simulated blood cultures.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1