Analgesic efficacy of ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis plane block for laparoscopic gynecological surgery: a randomized controlled trial.

Anesthesia and pain medicine Pub Date : 2022-01-01 Epub Date: 2022-01-07 DOI:10.17085/apm.21030
Divya Sethi, Garima Garg
{"title":"Analgesic efficacy of ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis plane block for laparoscopic gynecological surgery: a randomized controlled trial.","authors":"Divya Sethi,&nbsp;Garima Garg","doi":"10.17085/apm.21030","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study aimed to determine whether ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block is more effective in reducing postoperative pain and analgesic consumption than local anesthetic infiltration (LAI) at the port site for elective laparoscopic gynecological surgeries.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Eighty patients with the American Society of Anesthesiologists status I/II undergoing laparoscopic gynecology surgery were enrolled for this randomized control trial. After general anesthesia was administered, patients in group C received LAI at each port site, and patients in group T received bilateral ultrasound-guided TAP. Postoperative pain was assessed at time intervals of 1/2, 2, 4, 6, 8, and 24 h using the numeric pain scale (NPS). Clinical metrics such as postoperative analgesic diclofenac consumption, need for rescue fentanyl, nausea-vomiting scores, and antiemetic requirements were also recorded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seventy-four patients were included in the final analysis. Postoperatively, patients in group T had significantly lower NPS than those in group C (P < 0.05). The highest difference in the postoperative NPS was observed at 2 h (median [1Q, 3Q]; group C = 3 [2, 4]; group T = 1 [0, 2]; P < 0.001). A statistically significant difference was observed in the frequency of diclofenac (75 mg intravenous) requirement between the groups (P = 0.010). No significant difference was observed between the groups in need of rescue fentanyl or antiemetic and the nausea-vomiting scores.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In patients undergoing laparoscopic gynecological surgery, ultrasound-guided TAP block provided greater postoperative analgesic benefits in terms of lower NPS and reduced analgesic requirements than port site LAI.</p>","PeriodicalId":7801,"journal":{"name":"Anesthesia and pain medicine","volume":"17 1","pages":"67-74"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/76/09/apm-21030.PMC8841257.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anesthesia and pain medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17085/apm.21030","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/1/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: This study aimed to determine whether ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block is more effective in reducing postoperative pain and analgesic consumption than local anesthetic infiltration (LAI) at the port site for elective laparoscopic gynecological surgeries.

Methods: Eighty patients with the American Society of Anesthesiologists status I/II undergoing laparoscopic gynecology surgery were enrolled for this randomized control trial. After general anesthesia was administered, patients in group C received LAI at each port site, and patients in group T received bilateral ultrasound-guided TAP. Postoperative pain was assessed at time intervals of 1/2, 2, 4, 6, 8, and 24 h using the numeric pain scale (NPS). Clinical metrics such as postoperative analgesic diclofenac consumption, need for rescue fentanyl, nausea-vomiting scores, and antiemetic requirements were also recorded.

Results: Seventy-four patients were included in the final analysis. Postoperatively, patients in group T had significantly lower NPS than those in group C (P < 0.05). The highest difference in the postoperative NPS was observed at 2 h (median [1Q, 3Q]; group C = 3 [2, 4]; group T = 1 [0, 2]; P < 0.001). A statistically significant difference was observed in the frequency of diclofenac (75 mg intravenous) requirement between the groups (P = 0.010). No significant difference was observed between the groups in need of rescue fentanyl or antiemetic and the nausea-vomiting scores.

Conclusions: In patients undergoing laparoscopic gynecological surgery, ultrasound-guided TAP block provided greater postoperative analgesic benefits in terms of lower NPS and reduced analgesic requirements than port site LAI.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
超声引导下经腹平面阻滞用于腹腔镜妇科手术的镇痛效果:一项随机对照试验。
背景:本研究旨在探讨超声引导下经腹平面(TAP)阻滞是否比port部位局麻浸润(LAI)更有效地减少选择性腹腔镜妇科手术术后疼痛和镇痛消耗。方法:80例具有美国麻醉医师学会I/II资格的腹腔镜妇科手术患者纳入随机对照试验。全麻后,C组患者行各端口LAI, T组患者行双侧超声引导下TAP。术后疼痛在1/2、2、4、6、8和24小时的时间间隔使用数字疼痛量表(NPS)进行评估。临床指标,如术后镇痛药双氯芬酸用量、芬太尼抢救需求、恶心呕吐评分和止吐要求也被记录。结果:74例患者纳入最终分析。术后T组患者NPS明显低于C组(P < 0.05)。术后NPS差异最大的时间为2 h(中位数[1Q, 3Q];C组= 3 [2,4];组T = 1 [0,2];P < 0.001)。两组间双氯芬酸(75mg静脉注射)需用频率差异有统计学意义(P = 0.010)。需要芬太尼或止吐药抢救组和恶心呕吐评分之间无显著差异。结论:在腹腔镜妇科手术患者中,超声引导下的TAP阻滞在降低NPS和减少镇痛需求方面比port site LAI具有更大的术后镇痛效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Anesthetic neurotoxicity in the developing brain: an update on theinsights and implications for fetal surgery Extubation and removal of supraglottic airway devices in pediatric anesthesia Relationship between intraoperative requirement for anesthetics and postoperative analgesic consumption in laparoscopic colectomy: a randomized controlled double-blinded study Opioid-free anesthesia using a combination of ketamine and dexmedetomidine in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a randomized controlled trial How does circadian rhythm affect postoperative pain after pediatric acute appendicitis surgery?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1