Gestational diabetes in Germany: Development of screening participation and prevalence.

Journal of health monitoring Pub Date : 2021-06-16 eCollection Date: 2021-06-01 DOI:10.25646/8325
Lukas Reitzle, Christian Schmidt, Christin Heidemann, Andrea Icks, Matthias Kaltheuner, Thomas Ziese, Christa Scheidt-Nave
{"title":"Gestational diabetes in Germany: Development of screening participation and prevalence.","authors":"Lukas Reitzle, Christian Schmidt, Christin Heidemann, Andrea Icks, Matthias Kaltheuner, Thomas Ziese, Christa Scheidt-Nave","doi":"10.25646/8325","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is an important risk factor for pregnancy complications. Since 2012, the Federal Joint Committee's maternity directive recommends a two-step screening for GDM with a pre-test and subsequent diagnostic test if the pre-test is positive. This study analyses the implementation and development over time of GDM screening participation and prevalence in Germany. The data basis is the external inpatient obstetrics quality assurance documentation, which covers all births in hospital. Women with diabetes before pregnancy were excluded. The study defined women as GDM cases if the condition was documented in maternity records or if the ICD-10 diagnosis O24.4 was coded for inpatients at discharge and figures were determined for the years 2013 to 2018. As the documentation of screening tests has only been included in the data set since 2016, screening participation for the years 2016 to 2018 were estimated and evaluated based on the pre-test and/or diagnostic tests documented in maternity records. In 2018, the majority of all women who gave birth in hospitals had had a pre-test conducted (65.0%) or a pre-test and diagnostic test (18.2%) in line with the two-step procedure. A further 6.7% received a diagnostic test alone. GDM screening participation increased over time from 83.4% in 2016 to 89.9% in 2018. The prevalence of a documented GDM increased from 4.6% to 6.8% between 2013 and 2018. In 2018, this equates to 51,318 women with GDM. Reliably assessing the extent and causes of this development will require continuous analyses of screening implementation, documentation and changes in maternal risk factors.</p>","PeriodicalId":73767,"journal":{"name":"Journal of health monitoring","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8734204/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of health monitoring","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25646/8325","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/6/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is an important risk factor for pregnancy complications. Since 2012, the Federal Joint Committee's maternity directive recommends a two-step screening for GDM with a pre-test and subsequent diagnostic test if the pre-test is positive. This study analyses the implementation and development over time of GDM screening participation and prevalence in Germany. The data basis is the external inpatient obstetrics quality assurance documentation, which covers all births in hospital. Women with diabetes before pregnancy were excluded. The study defined women as GDM cases if the condition was documented in maternity records or if the ICD-10 diagnosis O24.4 was coded for inpatients at discharge and figures were determined for the years 2013 to 2018. As the documentation of screening tests has only been included in the data set since 2016, screening participation for the years 2016 to 2018 were estimated and evaluated based on the pre-test and/or diagnostic tests documented in maternity records. In 2018, the majority of all women who gave birth in hospitals had had a pre-test conducted (65.0%) or a pre-test and diagnostic test (18.2%) in line with the two-step procedure. A further 6.7% received a diagnostic test alone. GDM screening participation increased over time from 83.4% in 2016 to 89.9% in 2018. The prevalence of a documented GDM increased from 4.6% to 6.8% between 2013 and 2018. In 2018, this equates to 51,318 women with GDM. Reliably assessing the extent and causes of this development will require continuous analyses of screening implementation, documentation and changes in maternal risk factors.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
德国的妊娠糖尿病:筛查参与率和患病率的发展情况。
妊娠糖尿病(GDM)是导致妊娠并发症的重要风险因素。自 2012 年起,联邦联合委员会的孕产指令建议分两步筛查 GDM,即进行预检,如果预检结果呈阳性,则进行后续诊断检测。本研究分析了德国 GDM 筛查参与率和患病率的实施和发展情况。数据基础是外部住院产科质量保证文件,该文件涵盖了医院的所有新生儿。孕前患有糖尿病的妇女被排除在外。如果产科记录中记录有 GDM 病例,或者住院病人出院时的 ICD-10 诊断编码为 O24.4,则该研究将其定义为 GDM 病例,并确定了 2013 年至 2018 年的数据。由于筛查试验的记录自 2016 年起才纳入数据集,因此根据产科记录中记录的预检和/或诊断检测,对 2016 年至 2018 年的筛查参与情况进行了估算和评估。2018 年,在医院分娩的所有产妇中,大多数都按照两步程序进行了预检(65.0%)或预检和诊断检测(18.2%)。另有 6.7% 的人只接受了诊断性检测。GDM筛查参与率从2016年的83.4%上升到2018年的89.9%。2013 年至 2018 年期间,记录在案的 GDM 患病率从 4.6% 增加到 6.8%。2018 年,这相当于有 51318 名妇女患有 GDM。要可靠地评估这一发展的程度和原因,需要对筛查的实施、记录和孕产妇风险因素的变化进行持续分析。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Health of single mothers and fathers in Germany. Results of the GEDA studies 2019 - 2023. Diabetes surveillance - Laying the groundwork for non-communicable disease surveillance in Germany. Journal of Health Monitoring - what's new in 2024? Type 2 diabetes among people with selected citizenships in Germany: risk, healthcare, complications. Healthcare and health situation of adults with type 2 diabetes in Germany: The study GEDA 2021/2022-Diabetes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1