Factors Influencing the Use of Pedestrian Bridges in North of Iran.

Zahra Mohtasham-Amiri, Iraj Barge-Gol, Leila Kouchakinejad-Eramsadati, Payam Abedian, Helya Jafari-Shakib
{"title":"Factors Influencing the Use of Pedestrian Bridges in North of Iran.","authors":"Zahra Mohtasham-Amiri,&nbsp;Iraj Barge-Gol,&nbsp;Leila Kouchakinejad-Eramsadati,&nbsp;Payam Abedian,&nbsp;Helya Jafari-Shakib","doi":"10.30476/BEAT.2022.92068.1297","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To find out factors that influence the use/non-use of pedestrian bridges in Northern Iran.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this observational study, 4 pedestrian bridges at four different places in Rasht, North of Iran was studied. In addition to demographic data, pedestrians were interviewed for reasons of use/not use the pedestrian bridge. The data analyzed with SPSS software version 18 by non-parametric tests such as Chi Square.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From all 499 participants, more than one-third of pedestrians had not used pedestrian bridges. The most reasons for bridges use among respondents were feeling of safety and security (79.2%) and obey the rules (53.6%). The reasons for the non-use of bridges were time saving (63.7%), laziness (48.7%) and inappropriate of the bridge (34.2%). There were no significant differences in age, sex, education level, and road accidents' history with use of bridge but there was a significant difference between the bridge usage with having a driver's license, rash-hour time, and the presence of a mechanical elevator (<i>p</i><0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The results of this study show that in order to increase the pedestrian bridges use, it is necessary to pay more attention to make standard facilities such as installing escalators or elevators of these bridges.</p>","PeriodicalId":9333,"journal":{"name":"Bulletin of emergency and trauma","volume":"10 1","pages":"27-32"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8818107/pdf/","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bulletin of emergency and trauma","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30476/BEAT.2022.92068.1297","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Objective: To find out factors that influence the use/non-use of pedestrian bridges in Northern Iran.

Methods: In this observational study, 4 pedestrian bridges at four different places in Rasht, North of Iran was studied. In addition to demographic data, pedestrians were interviewed for reasons of use/not use the pedestrian bridge. The data analyzed with SPSS software version 18 by non-parametric tests such as Chi Square.

Results: From all 499 participants, more than one-third of pedestrians had not used pedestrian bridges. The most reasons for bridges use among respondents were feeling of safety and security (79.2%) and obey the rules (53.6%). The reasons for the non-use of bridges were time saving (63.7%), laziness (48.7%) and inappropriate of the bridge (34.2%). There were no significant differences in age, sex, education level, and road accidents' history with use of bridge but there was a significant difference between the bridge usage with having a driver's license, rash-hour time, and the presence of a mechanical elevator (p<0.001).

Conclusion: The results of this study show that in order to increase the pedestrian bridges use, it is necessary to pay more attention to make standard facilities such as installing escalators or elevators of these bridges.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
影响伊朗北部人行天桥使用的因素。
目的:了解影响伊朗北部地区人行天桥使用/不使用的因素。方法:对伊朗北部拉什特4个不同地点的4座人行天桥进行观察研究。除人口统计数据外,我们亦就使用/不使用行人天桥的原因访问行人。数据分析采用SPSS软件18版,采用卡方等非参数检验。结果:在所有499名参与者中,超过三分之一的行人没有使用人行天桥。受访者使用桥梁的最大原因是安全感(79.2%)和遵守规则(53.6%)。不使用桥梁的原因是节省时间(63.7%)、懒惰(48.7%)和桥梁不合适(34.2%)。年龄、性别、受教育程度、道路交通事故发生历史与使用过桥没有显著性差异,但使用过桥与持有驾驶证、高峰时段、是否有机械电梯存在显著性差异(p)结论:本研究结果表明,为了增加人行过桥的使用,需要更加注意在人行过桥上安装自动扶梯或电梯等标准设施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
49
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: BEAT: Bulletin of Emergency And Trauma is an international, peer-reviewed, quarterly journal coping with original research contributing to the field of emergency medicine and trauma. BEAT is the official journal of the Trauma Research Center (TRC) of Shiraz University of Medical Sciences (SUMS), Hungarian Trauma Society (HTS) and Lusitanian Association for Trauma and Emergency Surgery (ALTEC/LATES) aiming to be a publication of international repute that serves as a medium for dissemination and exchange of scientific knowledge in the emergency medicine and trauma. The aim of BEAT is to publish original research focusing on practicing and training of emergency medicine and trauma to publish peer-reviewed articles of current international interest in the form of original articles, brief communications, reviews, case reports, clinical images, and letters.
期刊最新文献
An Epidemiological Investigation on Patients with Non-traumatic Subarachnoid Hemorrhage from 2010 to 2020. A Novel Skin Incision for Posterior Fossa Midline and Paramedian Lesions: A Technical Note and Case Series. Surgical Treatment versus Conservative Management of Splenic Rupture: Outcomes and Risk Factors. Effect of Intranasal Remifentanil versus Lidocaine on Facilitation of Laryngeal Mask Airway Insertion and Cardiovascular Response: A Double-blind Clinical Trial Study. Ten-year Causes of Cerebral Venous Sinus Thrombosis in Patients Referred to Ghaem Hospital from 2009 to 2019.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1