[Ethical limits to the promotion of health in the workplace within the framework of the ″healthy organization″ concept].

IF 0.3 Q4 ETHICS Cuadernos de Bioetica Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI:10.30444/CB.111
Rocío Gallego Villanueva, María José Martín Rodrigo, Federico de Montalvo Jääskeläinen
{"title":"[Ethical limits to the promotion of health in the workplace within the framework of the ″healthy organization″ concept].","authors":"Rocío Gallego Villanueva,&nbsp;María José Martín Rodrigo,&nbsp;Federico de Montalvo Jääskeläinen","doi":"10.30444/CB.111","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In the context of general changes in our societies in relation to health, the healthy organization is proclaimed and accepted as something necessary and legitimate. This phenomenon is expanding globally without being really questioned and promoted by international organizations and large companies. With a global and growing presence in organizational and professional policies and practices, it appears to be gaining even more strength in the aftermath of the pandemic. Faced with the expansion of the phenomenon and because it directly affects people's health, an analysis of it beyond its general positive image is unavoidable. This article identifies some relevant dangers of promoting a culture of health at work, from an ethical perspective, and among them, not only the non-beneficial nature of some practices not scientifically proven, but also their own malignant condition. In this paper, therefore, the ethical limits for this expansive phenomenon are proposed and the fundamental principle to operate in this area of asymmetric relations between employee and employer is not autonomy but non-maleficence.</p>","PeriodicalId":42510,"journal":{"name":"Cuadernos de Bioetica","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cuadernos de Bioetica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30444/CB.111","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ETHICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the context of general changes in our societies in relation to health, the healthy organization is proclaimed and accepted as something necessary and legitimate. This phenomenon is expanding globally without being really questioned and promoted by international organizations and large companies. With a global and growing presence in organizational and professional policies and practices, it appears to be gaining even more strength in the aftermath of the pandemic. Faced with the expansion of the phenomenon and because it directly affects people's health, an analysis of it beyond its general positive image is unavoidable. This article identifies some relevant dangers of promoting a culture of health at work, from an ethical perspective, and among them, not only the non-beneficial nature of some practices not scientifically proven, but also their own malignant condition. In this paper, therefore, the ethical limits for this expansive phenomenon are proposed and the fundamental principle to operate in this area of asymmetric relations between employee and employer is not autonomy but non-maleficence.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
[在″健康组织″概念框架内促进工作场所健康的道德限制]。
在与健康有关的社会普遍变化的背景下,健康的组织被宣布和接受为必要和合法的东西。这种现象在没有受到国际组织和大公司真正质疑和推动的情况下,正在全球范围内蔓延。随着在组织和专业政策及做法中的全球性和日益增长的存在,它似乎在大流行病之后获得了更大的力量。面对这一现象的扩大,因为它直接影响到人们的健康,对它的分析超越了它的一般积极形象是不可避免的。本文从伦理的角度确定了在工作中促进健康文化的一些相关危险,其中不仅有一些未经科学证明的做法的非有益性质,而且还有它们自己的恶性状况。因此,本文提出了这种扩张性现象的伦理限制,并且在雇员和雇主之间不对称关系的这一领域中运作的基本原则不是自治,而是非恶意。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
20.00%
发文量
5
期刊介绍: La revista Cuadernos de Bioética, órgano oficial de la Asociación Española de Bioética y Ética Médica, publica cuatrimestralmente artículos y recensiones bibliográficas sobre todas las áreas de la bioética: fundamentación, ética de la investigación, bioética clínica, biojurídica, etc. Estos proceden de los aceptados en la revisión tutelada por los editores de la revista como de otros que por encargo el comité editorial solicite a sus autores. La edicion de la revista se financia con las aportaciones de los socios de AEBI.
期刊最新文献
[Bioethical issues of Covid-19 in Spain. A systematic review]. [Ethical and legal implications of digital mental health applications]. [Human reason versus arrogance technoscience and the replacement shadow. -Ethical evaluation and social control to regain power on the means and ends from the work of José Sanmartín]. [Response to: ″An egg is not a chicken and an embryo is not a child″]. [The proposal for a regulation on the recognition of parenthood: An attempt to recognize surrogacy in the European Union?]
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1