A survey of calf rearing practices in the south-west region of Western Australia.

IF 1.1 4区 农林科学 Q3 VETERINARY SCIENCES New Zealand veterinary journal Pub Date : 2022-07-01 Epub Date: 2022-03-07 DOI:10.1080/00480169.2022.2042413
J W Aleri, A D Fisher, J Gogoi-Tiwari, F K Waichigo, H R Sodagari, P C Irons, I D Robertson
{"title":"A survey of calf rearing practices in the south-west region of Western Australia.","authors":"J W Aleri,&nbsp;A D Fisher,&nbsp;J Gogoi-Tiwari,&nbsp;F K Waichigo,&nbsp;H R Sodagari,&nbsp;P C Irons,&nbsp;I D Robertson","doi":"10.1080/00480169.2022.2042413","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>To gather data on the calf management and rearing practices of a subset of dairy farmers in the south-west region of Western Australia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A 30-minute face-to-face survey was conducted with dairy cattle producers in the south-west region of Western Australia from April-June 2019 to determine pre-weaning calf rearing practices. Participation was voluntary, using a self-selected subset of dairy farmers registered with a regional extension group. The questionnaire assessed three broad categories: farm demographics, colostrum harvesting and management and calf rearing practices.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study response rate was 34/140 (24%). The following key areas were identified where there were deviations from recognised best practice: Precalving: no transition diet was fed pre-calving on 4/34 (12%) of farms, and on a further 5/34 (15%) it was fed for less than 3 weeks; mixing of heifers and adult cows in the calving paddocks occurred in 24/34 (70%) of the farms, with 15% (5/34) of the farms using calving induction. During calving 14/34 (41%) of the farms did not disinfect navels of new-born calves; although 23/34 farmers stated that they collected calves within 6 hours of birth, data on frequency of calf pick-up (2/34 did not separate calves and dams and 19/34 picked up only once per day) indicated that on 21/34 farms (62%) the reality was that calves were picked up >12 hours after birth. Colostrum quality was not assessed appropriately on 18/34 (53%) farms and farmers overestimated how soon after birth it was administered: 23/34 (68%) reported feeding it within 6 hours of calving, despite 62% picking up calves >12 hours after calving. Regarding calf rearing practices, no pain relief before or after dehorning was used on 20/34 (59%) farms, calf bedding was removed infrequently (<weekly) on 26/35 (76%) farms and appropriate isolation of sick calves was only reported by 14/34 (41%) farmers.</p><p><strong>Conclusion and clinical relevance: </strong>Although limited by the low response rate, this is the first survey of dairy calf rearing practices in the south-western region of Western Australia. We found evidence of at least one process inconsistent with industry best-practice on 34/140 (24%) of responding farms and all farms had more than one sub-optimal calf rearing practice. This highlights the need to improve calf rearing in this region and identifies key areas of deficiency for further study and extension to producers.</p>","PeriodicalId":19322,"journal":{"name":"New Zealand veterinary journal","volume":"70 4","pages":"211-217"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"New Zealand veterinary journal","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00480169.2022.2042413","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/3/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Aims: To gather data on the calf management and rearing practices of a subset of dairy farmers in the south-west region of Western Australia.

Methods: A 30-minute face-to-face survey was conducted with dairy cattle producers in the south-west region of Western Australia from April-June 2019 to determine pre-weaning calf rearing practices. Participation was voluntary, using a self-selected subset of dairy farmers registered with a regional extension group. The questionnaire assessed three broad categories: farm demographics, colostrum harvesting and management and calf rearing practices.

Results: The study response rate was 34/140 (24%). The following key areas were identified where there were deviations from recognised best practice: Precalving: no transition diet was fed pre-calving on 4/34 (12%) of farms, and on a further 5/34 (15%) it was fed for less than 3 weeks; mixing of heifers and adult cows in the calving paddocks occurred in 24/34 (70%) of the farms, with 15% (5/34) of the farms using calving induction. During calving 14/34 (41%) of the farms did not disinfect navels of new-born calves; although 23/34 farmers stated that they collected calves within 6 hours of birth, data on frequency of calf pick-up (2/34 did not separate calves and dams and 19/34 picked up only once per day) indicated that on 21/34 farms (62%) the reality was that calves were picked up >12 hours after birth. Colostrum quality was not assessed appropriately on 18/34 (53%) farms and farmers overestimated how soon after birth it was administered: 23/34 (68%) reported feeding it within 6 hours of calving, despite 62% picking up calves >12 hours after calving. Regarding calf rearing practices, no pain relief before or after dehorning was used on 20/34 (59%) farms, calf bedding was removed infrequently (

Conclusion and clinical relevance: Although limited by the low response rate, this is the first survey of dairy calf rearing practices in the south-western region of Western Australia. We found evidence of at least one process inconsistent with industry best-practice on 34/140 (24%) of responding farms and all farms had more than one sub-optimal calf rearing practice. This highlights the need to improve calf rearing in this region and identifies key areas of deficiency for further study and extension to producers.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
西澳大利亚西南地区小牛饲养实践的调查。
目的:收集数据小牛管理和饲养做法的一小部分奶农在西澳大利亚州的西南地区。方法:2019年4月至6月,对西澳大利亚西南部地区的奶牛生产者进行了30分钟的面对面调查,以确定断奶前小牛的饲养方法。参与是自愿的,使用的是在区域推广小组注册的奶农自行选择的子集。调查问卷评估了三大类:农场人口统计、初乳收获和管理以及小牛饲养方法。结果:研究有效率为34/140(24%)。确定了与公认的最佳实践存在偏差的以下关键领域:产犊前:4/34(12%)的农场在产犊前不饲喂过渡饲粮,另有5/34(15%)的农场在3周内饲喂过渡饲粮;24/34(70%)的农场在产犊围场中混合使用小母牛和成年奶牛,15%(5/34)的农场采用产犊诱导。产犊期间,14/34(41%)的养殖场未对新生小牛的肚脐进行消毒;尽管有23/34的养殖户表示他们在出生后6小时内收集了小牛,但关于小牛收集频率的数据(2/34没有将小牛和水坝分开,19/34每天只收集一次)表明,在21/34的养殖户(62%)中,实际情况是小牛在出生后12小时内被收集。18/34(53%)的农场没有对初乳质量进行适当评估,农民高估了出生后给牛初乳的时间:23/34(68%)的农场报告在产犊6小时内给牛初乳,尽管62%的农场在产犊12小时后才给牛初乳。在小牛饲养实践中,20/34(59%)的养殖场在去角之前或之后没有使用镇痛措施,小牛垫料很少被移除(结论和临床相关性:尽管受低应答率的限制,这是西澳大利亚州西南地区首次对奶牛小牛饲养实践的调查。我们发现有证据表明,在34/140(24%)的响应农场中,至少有一个过程与行业最佳实践不一致,所有农场都有一个以上的次优小牛饲养实践。这突出了改善该地区小牛饲养的必要性,并确定了需要进一步研究和推广给生产者的关键不足领域。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
New Zealand veterinary journal
New Zealand veterinary journal 农林科学-兽医学
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
37
审稿时长
12-24 weeks
期刊介绍: The New Zealand Veterinary Journal (NZVJ) is an international journal publishing high quality peer-reviewed articles covering all aspects of veterinary science, including clinical practice, animal welfare and animal health. The NZVJ publishes original research findings, clinical communications (including novel case reports and case series), rapid communications, correspondence and review articles, originating from New Zealand and internationally. Topics should be relevant to, but not limited to, New Zealand veterinary and animal science communities, and include the disciplines of infectious disease, medicine, surgery and the health, management and welfare of production and companion animals, horses and New Zealand wildlife. All submissions are expected to meet the highest ethical and welfare standards, as detailed in the Journal’s instructions for authors.
期刊最新文献
The association between fluoride concentrations and spontaneous humeral fracture in first-lactation dairy cows: results from two New Zealand studies. A retrospective analysis of post-mortem findings in New Zealand weka (Gallirallus australis), 1995-2022. Gastrointestinal nematode parasites of grazing ruminants: a comprehensive literature review of diagnostic methods for quantifying parasitism, larval differentiation and measuring anthelmintic resistance. Comparison of bacterial culture results obtained from three different sampling locations in dogs and cats with chronic nasal disease. Folliculectomy for the treatment of pre-ovulatory follicular stasis in three illegally captured West Coast green geckos (Naultinus tuberculatus) to enable wild rehabilitation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1