A "20/20" Match: ACC/AHA 2017 versus ESC/ESH 2018 Guidelines for Management of Hypertension.

IF 0.5 Q4 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE International Journal of Angiology Pub Date : 2021-11-22 eCollection Date: 2021-12-01 DOI:10.1055/s-0041-1732433
Akshyaya Pradhan, Shweta Vohra, Rishi Sethi
{"title":"A \"20/20\" Match: ACC/AHA 2017 versus ESC/ESH 2018 Guidelines for Management of Hypertension.","authors":"Akshyaya Pradhan,&nbsp;Shweta Vohra,&nbsp;Rishi Sethi","doi":"10.1055/s-0041-1732433","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Hypertension, the commonest noncommunicable disease globally, is an important risk factor for cardiovascular disease and renal failure. Theoretically, while it is easy to diagnose and manage by simple measures, practically it has been observed that not only treatment but also diagnosis and its preventive measures are inadequate in developing as well as developed nations. Several guidelines by various international organizations are available to guide clinicians for hypertension management. Though the basic principles of hypertension management are similar in all the guidelines, subtle differences are there. In this article, we compare the two most widely accepted guidelines for hypertension, that is, American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association 2017 Hypertension Guidelines and 2018 European Society of Cardiology and European Society of Hypertension Guidelines on Hypertension. Both the differences and similarities between these two widely followed guidelines are presented.</p>","PeriodicalId":13798,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Angiology","volume":"30 4","pages":"243-248"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8608471/pdf/10-1055-s-0041-1732433.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Angiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0041-1732433","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/12/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Hypertension, the commonest noncommunicable disease globally, is an important risk factor for cardiovascular disease and renal failure. Theoretically, while it is easy to diagnose and manage by simple measures, practically it has been observed that not only treatment but also diagnosis and its preventive measures are inadequate in developing as well as developed nations. Several guidelines by various international organizations are available to guide clinicians for hypertension management. Though the basic principles of hypertension management are similar in all the guidelines, subtle differences are there. In this article, we compare the two most widely accepted guidelines for hypertension, that is, American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association 2017 Hypertension Guidelines and 2018 European Society of Cardiology and European Society of Hypertension Guidelines on Hypertension. Both the differences and similarities between these two widely followed guidelines are presented.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
“20/20”匹配:ACC/AHA 2017与ESC/ESH 2018高血压管理指南
高血压是全球最常见的非传染性疾病,是心血管疾病和肾衰竭的重要危险因素。理论上,虽然通过简单的措施很容易诊断和管理,但实际上,发展中国家和发达国家不仅在治疗方面,而且在诊断和预防措施方面都存在不足。各种国际组织制定的一些指导方针可用于指导临床医生进行高血压管理。虽然高血压管理的基本原则在所有指南中都是相似的,但也存在细微的差异。在本文中,我们比较了两个最被广泛接受的高血压指南,即美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会2017年高血压指南和2018年欧洲心脏病学会和欧洲高血压学会高血压指南。本文介绍了这两种广泛遵循的指导方针之间的异同。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Angiology
International Journal of Angiology PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE-
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
16.70%
发文量
57
期刊最新文献
Grayscale Inversion to aid Diagnosis of Acute Occlusive and Chronic Pulmonary Embolism on CT. Long-Term Outcomes of Endovascular Repair of Thoracic Aortic Aneurysms. Anticoagulation in the Management of Acute Pulmonary Embolism-A Review. Pericardial Decompression Syndrome: A Comprehensive Review of a Controversial Entity. Diagnostic Strategies in Pulmonary Embolism.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1