Developing and validating an instrument to measure: the medical professionalism climate in clinical settings.

Pub Date : 2021-11-03 eCollection Date: 2021-01-01 DOI:10.18502/jmehm.v14i11.7666
Fariba Asghari, Zahra Shahvari, Abbas Ebadi, Fateme Alipour, Shahram Samadi, Maryam Bahreini, Homayoun Amini
{"title":"Developing and validating an instrument to measure: the medical professionalism climate in clinical settings.","authors":"Fariba Asghari, Zahra Shahvari, Abbas Ebadi, Fateme Alipour, Shahram Samadi, Maryam Bahreini, Homayoun Amini","doi":"10.18502/jmehm.v14i11.7666","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study was conducted to develop and validate an instrument to measure the medical professionalism climate in clinical settings. The item pool was developed based on the Tehran University of Medical Sciences Guideline for Professional Conduct. The items were distributed between two questionnaires, one for health-care providers and the other for patients. To assess the construct validity of the questionnaires, 350 health-care providers and 88 patients were enrolled in the study. The reliability of the questionnaires was evaluated by calculating Cronbach's alpha and ICC. At first a 74-item pool was generated. After assessing and confirming face and content validity, 41 items remained in the final version of the scale. Exploratory factor analysis revealed the three factors of \"personal behavior\", \"collegiality\" and \"respect for patient autonomy\" in a 25-item questionnaire for service providers and a single factor of \"professional behavior\" in a 6-item questionnaire for patients. The three factors explained 51.775% of the variance for service providers' questionnaire and the single factor explained 63.9% of the variance for patients' questionnaire. The findings demonstrated that from the viewpoints of patients and service providers, this instrument could be applied to assess the medical professionalism climate in hospital clinical settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-11-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/43/dc/JMEHM-14-11.PMC8696557.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18502/jmehm.v14i11.7666","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study was conducted to develop and validate an instrument to measure the medical professionalism climate in clinical settings. The item pool was developed based on the Tehran University of Medical Sciences Guideline for Professional Conduct. The items were distributed between two questionnaires, one for health-care providers and the other for patients. To assess the construct validity of the questionnaires, 350 health-care providers and 88 patients were enrolled in the study. The reliability of the questionnaires was evaluated by calculating Cronbach's alpha and ICC. At first a 74-item pool was generated. After assessing and confirming face and content validity, 41 items remained in the final version of the scale. Exploratory factor analysis revealed the three factors of "personal behavior", "collegiality" and "respect for patient autonomy" in a 25-item questionnaire for service providers and a single factor of "professional behavior" in a 6-item questionnaire for patients. The three factors explained 51.775% of the variance for service providers' questionnaire and the single factor explained 63.9% of the variance for patients' questionnaire. The findings demonstrated that from the viewpoints of patients and service providers, this instrument could be applied to assess the medical professionalism climate in hospital clinical settings.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
开发和验证测量工具:临床环境中的医学职业精神氛围。
本研究旨在开发并验证一种用于测量临床环境中医疗职业精神氛围的工具。项目库是根据《德黑兰医科大学职业行为指南》开发的。这些项目分布在两份问卷中,一份针对医疗服务提供者,另一份针对患者。为评估问卷的结构效度,350 名医护人员和 88 名患者参与了研究。通过计算 Cronbach's alpha 和 ICC,对问卷的可靠性进行了评估。首先生成了一个 74 个项目的项目库。在对表面效度和内容效度进行评估和确认后,最终版本的量表保留了 41 个项目。探索性因子分析显示,在针对服务提供者的 25 个条目问卷中,存在 "个人行为"、"同事关系 "和 "尊重患者自主权 "三个因子;在针对患者的 6 个条目问卷中,存在 "职业行为 "一个因子。三个因子解释了服务提供者问卷 51.775% 的方差,单因子解释了患者问卷 63.9% 的方差。研究结果表明,从患者和服务提供者的角度来看,该工具可用于评估医院临床环境中的医疗职业精神氛围。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1