The Role of Just World Beliefs in Responding to the COVID-19 Pandemic.

IF 1.6 3区 社会学 Q4 PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL Social Justice Research Pub Date : 2022-01-01 Epub Date: 2022-02-17 DOI:10.1007/s11211-022-00388-1
Antonia Mariss, Nina Reinhardt, Simon Schindler
{"title":"The Role of Just World Beliefs in Responding to the COVID-19 Pandemic.","authors":"Antonia Mariss, Nina Reinhardt, Simon Schindler","doi":"10.1007/s11211-022-00388-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study investigated whether people's personal belief in a just world (BJW) is linked to their willingness to physically distance themselves from others during the COVID-19 pandemic. Past research found personal BJW to be positively related to prosocial behavior, justice striving, and lower risk perceptions. If social distancing reflects a concern for others, high personal BJW should predict increased interest in social distancing. If social distancing reflects a concern for one's personal risk, high personal BJW should predict decreased interest in social distancing. Results of a pre-registered internet-based study from Germany (<i>N</i> = 361) indicated that the higher people's personal BJW, the more they generally practiced social distancing. This association still occurred when controlling for empathy, another significant predictor of social distancing. There were no mediation effects of empathy and risk perception. The findings extend knowledge on the correlates of social distancing in the COVID-19 pandemic which could be used to increase compliance among citizens.</p>","PeriodicalId":47602,"journal":{"name":"Social Justice Research","volume":"35 2","pages":"188-205"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8853351/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social Justice Research","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11211-022-00388-1","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/2/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study investigated whether people's personal belief in a just world (BJW) is linked to their willingness to physically distance themselves from others during the COVID-19 pandemic. Past research found personal BJW to be positively related to prosocial behavior, justice striving, and lower risk perceptions. If social distancing reflects a concern for others, high personal BJW should predict increased interest in social distancing. If social distancing reflects a concern for one's personal risk, high personal BJW should predict decreased interest in social distancing. Results of a pre-registered internet-based study from Germany (N = 361) indicated that the higher people's personal BJW, the more they generally practiced social distancing. This association still occurred when controlling for empathy, another significant predictor of social distancing. There were no mediation effects of empathy and risk perception. The findings extend knowledge on the correlates of social distancing in the COVID-19 pandemic which could be used to increase compliance among citizens.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
公正世界信念在应对 COVID-19 大流行中的作用。
本研究调查了人们对公正世界的个人信念(BJW)是否与他们在 COVID-19 大流行期间与他人保持身体距离的意愿有关。过去的研究发现,个人的公正世界信念与亲社会行为、争取正义和较低的风险感知呈正相关。如果社交疏远反映了对他人的关心,那么高个人北京时间和工作应预示着对社交疏远的兴趣会增加。如果社会疏远反映的是对个人风险的关注,那么高个人北京博彩十大网站排名应预示着对社会疏远的兴趣会降低。德国一项预先登记的基于互联网的研究(N = 361)结果表明,人们的个人北京时间越高,他们一般就会越多地采取社交疏远的做法。在控制了社会疏远的另一个重要预测因素--移情的情况下,这种关联仍然存在。同理心和风险感知没有中介效应。这些研究结果扩展了对 COVID-19 大流行中社会疏远相关因素的了解,可用于提高公民的遵从度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
4.30%
发文量
22
期刊介绍: Social Justice Research, is an international multidisciplinary forum for the publication of original papers that have broad implications for social scientists investigating the origins, structures, and consequences of justice in human affairs. The journal encompasses the justice-related work (using traditional and novel approaches) of all social scientists-psychologists, sociologists, anthropologists, economists, policy scientists, political scientists, legal researchers, management scientists, and others. Its multidisciplinary approach furthers the integration of the various social science perspectives. In addition to original research papers - theoretical, empirical, and methodological - the journal also publishes book reviews and, from time to time, special thematic issues.
期刊最新文献
Procedural Justice and the Design of Administrative Dispute Resolution Procedures Thoughts on Educational Justice: Can Poor Students be Privileged? Experimental and Longitudinal Investigations of the Causal Relationship Between Belief in a Just World and Subjective Well-Being Correction to: The Organizational Underpinnings of Social Justice Theory Development Correction to: Confusing the Expression of Social Norms and Justice Motivation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1