Towards efficient verification of population protocols.

IF 0.7 4区 计算机科学 Q3 COMPUTER SCIENCE, THEORY & METHODS Formal Methods in System Design Pub Date : 2021-01-01 Epub Date: 2021-04-14 DOI:10.1007/s10703-021-00367-3
Michael Blondin, Javier Esparza, Stefan Jaax, Philipp J Meyer
{"title":"Towards efficient verification of population protocols.","authors":"Michael Blondin,&nbsp;Javier Esparza,&nbsp;Stefan Jaax,&nbsp;Philipp J Meyer","doi":"10.1007/s10703-021-00367-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Population protocols are a well established model of computation by anonymous, identical finite-state agents. A protocol is well-specified if from every initial configuration, all fair executions of the protocol reach a common consensus. The central verification question for population protocols is the <i>well-specification problem</i>: deciding if a given protocol is well-specified. Esparza et al. have recently shown that this problem is decidable, but with very high complexity: it is at least as hard as the Petri net reachability problem, which is TOWER-hard, and for which only algorithms of non-primitive recursive complexity are currently known. In this paper we introduce the class <math> <msup><mrow><mi>WS</mi></mrow> <mn>3</mn></msup> </math> of well-specified strongly-silent protocols and we prove that it is suitable for automatic verification. More precisely, we show that <math> <msup><mrow><mi>WS</mi></mrow> <mn>3</mn></msup> </math> has the same computational power as general well-specified protocols, and captures standard protocols from the literature. Moreover, we show that the membership and correctness problems for <math> <msup><mrow><mi>WS</mi></mrow> <mn>3</mn></msup> </math> reduce to solving boolean combinations of linear constraints over <math><mi>N</mi></math> . This allowed us to develop the first software able to automatically prove correctness for <i>all</i> of the infinitely many possible inputs.</p>","PeriodicalId":12430,"journal":{"name":"Formal Methods in System Design","volume":"57 3","pages":"305-342"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/s10703-021-00367-3","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Formal Methods in System Design","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10703-021-00367-3","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/4/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, THEORY & METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Population protocols are a well established model of computation by anonymous, identical finite-state agents. A protocol is well-specified if from every initial configuration, all fair executions of the protocol reach a common consensus. The central verification question for population protocols is the well-specification problem: deciding if a given protocol is well-specified. Esparza et al. have recently shown that this problem is decidable, but with very high complexity: it is at least as hard as the Petri net reachability problem, which is TOWER-hard, and for which only algorithms of non-primitive recursive complexity are currently known. In this paper we introduce the class WS 3 of well-specified strongly-silent protocols and we prove that it is suitable for automatic verification. More precisely, we show that WS 3 has the same computational power as general well-specified protocols, and captures standard protocols from the literature. Moreover, we show that the membership and correctness problems for WS 3 reduce to solving boolean combinations of linear constraints over N . This allowed us to develop the first software able to automatically prove correctness for all of the infinitely many possible inputs.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
促进有效核查人口议定书。
群体协议是由匿名的、相同的有限状态代理进行计算的一个完善的模型。如果从每个初始配置开始,协议的所有公平执行都达到了共同的共识,那么协议就是良好指定的。总体协议的核心验证问题是规范问题:确定给定的协议是否规范良好。Esparza等人最近表明,这个问题是可决定的,但具有非常高的复杂性:它至少与Petri网可达性问题一样难,后者是TOWER-hard的,目前只知道非原语递归复杂性的算法。本文介绍了WS - 3类完备的强静默协议,并证明了它适用于自动验证。更准确地说,我们表明WS 3具有与一般良好指定的协议相同的计算能力,并从文献中获取标准协议。此外,我们还证明了ws3的隶属性和正确性问题可以简化为求解N上线性约束的布尔组合。这使我们能够开发出第一个能够自动证明所有无限多可能输入的正确性的软件。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Formal Methods in System Design
Formal Methods in System Design 工程技术-计算机:理论方法
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
12.50%
发文量
16
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The focus of this journal is on formal methods for designing, implementing, and validating the correctness of hardware (VLSI) and software systems. The stimulus for starting a journal with this goal came from both academia and industry. In both areas, interest in the use of formal methods has increased rapidly during the past few years. The enormous cost and time required to validate new designs has led to the realization that more powerful techniques must be developed. A number of techniques and tools are currently being devised for improving the reliability, and robustness of complex hardware and software systems. While the boundary between the (sub)components of a system that are cast in hardware, firmware, or software continues to blur, the relevant design disciplines and formal methods are maturing rapidly. Consequently, an important (and useful) collection of commonly applicable formal methods are expected to emerge that will strongly influence future design environments and design methods.
期刊最新文献
Abstraction Modulo Stability PAC statistical model checking of mean payoff in discrete- and continuous-time MDP A verified durable transactional mutex lock for persistent x86-TSO Formally understanding Rust’s ownership and borrowing system at the memory level The hexatope and octatope abstract domains for neural network verification
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1