Effectiveness and safety assessment of beta-blockers, calcium channel blockers, and angiotensin receptor blockers in hypertensive patients: a prospective study.

IF 1.3 American journal of cardiovascular disease Pub Date : 2021-10-25 eCollection Date: 2021-01-01
Nilay Solanki, Dhruvi Pandit, Shubha Desai
{"title":"Effectiveness and safety assessment of beta-blockers, calcium channel blockers, and angiotensin receptor blockers in hypertensive patients: a prospective study.","authors":"Nilay Solanki, Dhruvi Pandit, Shubha Desai","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Hypertension is most common prevailing cardiovascular disease worldwide. In this condition the effectiveness and safety of already available and many time-tested medications should be regularly reviewed.</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>Ethical approval of study was obtained from human research ethics committee of the hospital. 180 patients were enrolled with three groups of antihypertensive medication groups as calcium channel blocker (amlodipine), beta blocker (metoprolol) and angiotensin receptor blocker (telmisartan) over a span of eight months. The data was obtained from week zero to twelve (SBP: Systolic Blood Pressure and DBP: Diastolic Blood Pressure). Safety of Beta blocker, calcium channel blocker and angiotensin receptor blocker were investigated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Comparison of efficacy between the beta blocker, calcium channel blocker and angiotensin blocker receptor blocker were shown to be non-significant. It indicated that all drug therapies have the same successful reduction of SBP (P-0.4819). No significant adverse reactions were observed in either class of the medicines.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The study showed the efficacy of Calcium Channel Blocker, Beta Blocker and Angiotensin Receptor Blocker in reduction of SBP & DBP was same, while Calcium Channel Blockers were superior to other two medications.</p>","PeriodicalId":7427,"journal":{"name":"American journal of cardiovascular disease","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8611269/pdf/ajcd0011-0601.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of cardiovascular disease","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Hypertension is most common prevailing cardiovascular disease worldwide. In this condition the effectiveness and safety of already available and many time-tested medications should be regularly reviewed.

Methodology: Ethical approval of study was obtained from human research ethics committee of the hospital. 180 patients were enrolled with three groups of antihypertensive medication groups as calcium channel blocker (amlodipine), beta blocker (metoprolol) and angiotensin receptor blocker (telmisartan) over a span of eight months. The data was obtained from week zero to twelve (SBP: Systolic Blood Pressure and DBP: Diastolic Blood Pressure). Safety of Beta blocker, calcium channel blocker and angiotensin receptor blocker were investigated.

Results: Comparison of efficacy between the beta blocker, calcium channel blocker and angiotensin blocker receptor blocker were shown to be non-significant. It indicated that all drug therapies have the same successful reduction of SBP (P-0.4819). No significant adverse reactions were observed in either class of the medicines.

Conclusion: The study showed the efficacy of Calcium Channel Blocker, Beta Blocker and Angiotensin Receptor Blocker in reduction of SBP & DBP was same, while Calcium Channel Blockers were superior to other two medications.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对高血压患者使用β-受体阻滞剂、钙通道阻滞剂和血管紧张素受体阻滞剂的有效性和安全性评估:一项前瞻性研究。
背景:高血压是全球最常见的心血管疾病:高血压是全球最常见的心血管疾病。在这种情况下,应定期审查现有的和许多经过时间考验的药物的有效性和安全性:研究获得了医院人类研究伦理委员会的伦理批准。180 名患者接受了为期八个月的三组降压药物治疗,分别为钙通道阻滞剂(氨氯地平)、β受体阻滞剂(美托洛尔)和血管紧张素受体阻滞剂(替米沙坦)。从第零周到第十二周获得数据(SBP:收缩压,DBP:舒张压)。研究还调查了β受体阻滞剂、钙通道阻滞剂和血管紧张素受体阻滞剂的安全性:结果:β受体阻滞剂、钙通道阻滞剂和血管紧张素受体阻滞剂的疗效比较无显著差异。结果表明,所有药物疗法都能成功降低 SBP(P-0.4819)。两类药物均未观察到明显的不良反应:研究表明,钙通道阻滞剂、β受体阻滞剂和血管紧张素受体阻滞剂在降低 SBP 和 DBP 方面的疗效相同,而钙通道阻滞剂优于其他两种药物。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
American journal of cardiovascular disease
American journal of cardiovascular disease CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
21
期刊最新文献
Disparities by sex, race, and region in acute myocardial infarction-related outcomes during the early COVID-19 pandemic: the national inpatient sample analysis. Evaluating antiarrhythmic drugs for managing infants with supraventricular tachycardia; a review. Gender-based disparities in outcomes of coronary bifurcation stenting in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Impact of frailty index on cardiovascular outcomes and readmissions of patent foramen ovale closure procedure: a propensity matched national analysis. Percutaneous coronary intervention involving coronary bifurcation is associated with higher mortality and complications.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1