Evaluation of therapeutic effect and health economics of general anesthesia and routine outpatient dental treatment in children with severe early child caries.

Q3 Medicine 华西口腔医学杂志 Pub Date : 2021-12-01 DOI:10.7518/hxkq.2021.06.012
Ya Qi Liu, Qiong Zhang, Yan Wang, Xing Qu, Jing Zou
{"title":"Evaluation of therapeutic effect and health economics of general anesthesia and routine outpatient dental treatment in children with severe early child caries.","authors":"Ya Qi Liu, Qiong Zhang, Yan Wang, Xing Qu, Jing Zou","doi":"10.7518/hxkq.2021.06.012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To evaluate the efficacy and health economics of the comprehensive therapy for the children with severe early child caries (S-ECC) under dental general anesthesia (DGA) and conventional outpatient treatment to provide references for dentists and parents in the choice of clinical treatment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective cohort study was conducted on S-ECC children aged 36-71 months and who received dental treatment under general anesthesia or routine outpatient situation. The filled tooth survival rate, treatment cost, and cost-filled tooth survival time of the two groups were compared, and the curative effect and health economics was evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The filled tooth survival rate of the DGA group was higher than that of the routine outpatient group (<i>P</i><0.05). The average direct medical cost per filled tooth was significantly higher in the DGA group than in the routine outpatient group (<i>P</i><0.05). The direct medical cost-filled tooth survival time ratio in the DGA group was higher than that in the routine outpatient group (<i>P</i><0.05), but no significant difference was observed in the total medical cost-filled tooth survival time ratio (<i>P</i>>0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Compared with the conventional outpatient treatment group, the treatment outcomes of S-ECC under general anesthesia were better, and the costs were higher. However, no significant difference was observed in the total medical cost-filled tooth survival time between these two groups, and the conventional outpatient treatment did not have evident economic advantages.</p>","PeriodicalId":35800,"journal":{"name":"华西口腔医学杂志","volume":"39 6","pages":"703-708"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8703095/pdf/wcjs-39-06-703.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"华西口腔医学杂志","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7518/hxkq.2021.06.012","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To evaluate the efficacy and health economics of the comprehensive therapy for the children with severe early child caries (S-ECC) under dental general anesthesia (DGA) and conventional outpatient treatment to provide references for dentists and parents in the choice of clinical treatment.

Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted on S-ECC children aged 36-71 months and who received dental treatment under general anesthesia or routine outpatient situation. The filled tooth survival rate, treatment cost, and cost-filled tooth survival time of the two groups were compared, and the curative effect and health economics was evaluated.

Results: The filled tooth survival rate of the DGA group was higher than that of the routine outpatient group (P<0.05). The average direct medical cost per filled tooth was significantly higher in the DGA group than in the routine outpatient group (P<0.05). The direct medical cost-filled tooth survival time ratio in the DGA group was higher than that in the routine outpatient group (P<0.05), but no significant difference was observed in the total medical cost-filled tooth survival time ratio (P>0.05).

Conclusions: Compared with the conventional outpatient treatment group, the treatment outcomes of S-ECC under general anesthesia were better, and the costs were higher. However, no significant difference was observed in the total medical cost-filled tooth survival time between these two groups, and the conventional outpatient treatment did not have evident economic advantages.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
全麻与常规门诊治疗儿童早期严重龋的疗效及卫生经济学评价。
目的:评价牙科全麻(DGA)和常规门诊综合治疗儿童重度早期龋齿(S-ECC)的疗效和健康经济性,为牙医和家长选择临床治疗提供参考。方法:对36-71个月的S-ECC儿童进行回顾性队列研究,这些儿童在全麻或常规门诊情况下接受牙科治疗。比较两组充填牙成活率、治疗费用、充填牙成活时间,评价疗效和健康经济性。结果:DGA组充填牙成活率高于常规门诊组(PPPP>0.05)。结论:与常规门诊治疗组相比,全麻下S-ECC的治疗效果更好,费用更高。然而,这两组患者的总医疗费用填充牙齿存活时间没有显著差异,常规门诊治疗也没有明显的经济优势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
华西口腔医学杂志
华西口腔医学杂志 Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
6397
期刊介绍: West China Journal of Stomatology (WCJS, pISSN 1000-1182, eISSN 2618-0456, CN 51-1169/R), published bimonthly, is a peer-reviewed Open Access journal, hosted by Sichuan university and Ministry of Education of the People's Republic of China. WCJS was established in 1983 and indexed in Medline/Pubmed, SCOPUS, EBSCO, Chemical Abstract(CA), CNKI, WANFANG Data, etc.
期刊最新文献
Comparison of the efficacy and long-term stability of tunnel technique and coronally advanced flap in the treatment of gingival recession: a Meta-analysis. Intentional replantation for the retreatment of mandibular second molar: a case report. Simultaneous implantation and tooth preparation technology guided by 3D-printed guide. Three-dimensional reconstruction reveals the correlation between the extent of alveolar clefts and secondary nasal deformity in adults. Application of modified articular disc anchorage in treating the perforation and rupture of temporomandibular joint disc.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1