The Importance of Superb Microvascular Imaging for the Differentiation of Malignant Breast Lesions from Benign Lesions.

European journal of breast health Pub Date : 2021-12-30 eCollection Date: 2022-01-01 DOI:10.4274/ejbh.galenos.2021.2021-6-1
Fatma Zeynep Arslan, Ayşegül Altunkeser, Muslu Kazım Körez, Nergis Aksoy, Zeynep Bayramoğlu, Mehmet Karagülle
{"title":"The Importance of Superb Microvascular Imaging for the Differentiation of Malignant Breast Lesions from Benign Lesions.","authors":"Fatma Zeynep Arslan,&nbsp;Ayşegül Altunkeser,&nbsp;Muslu Kazım Körez,&nbsp;Nergis Aksoy,&nbsp;Zeynep Bayramoğlu,&nbsp;Mehmet Karagülle","doi":"10.4274/ejbh.galenos.2021.2021-6-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>In this prospective study, the diagnostic performance of the new version of superb microvascular imaging (SMI) in differentiating malignant from benign lesions was evaluated.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Ninety breast lesions were included. During color SMI examination, both free-hand region of interest (ROI) and box ROI were used. Vascular index (VI) values were obtained from the lesion using both types of ROI and from normal breast tissue via box ROI. VI values, monochrome SMI grading and histopathological results were compared. The efficacy of color SMI and monochrome SMI was investigated in differentiating between benign and malignant breast lesions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The cut-off value, in the differentiation of benign and malignant lesions with color SMI was 0.50 for box ROI, while it was 0.30 for free-hand ROI. The specificity of VI values obtained with box ROI was higher than that of free-hand ROI when differentiating malignant lesions from benign. Comparison of VI values from a lesion and from normal breast tissue showed that VI values in malignant lesions were significantly higher (p<0.05). The VI values of benign lesions and VI values of normal breast tissue were similar. There was a statistically significant relationship between monochrome SMI grading and the malignancy or benign status of the lesion (p<0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Drawing the lesion circumference free-hand using a free-shape ROI did not enhance the sensitivity and specificity. Contrary to popular belief, a more easy and practical measurement method may be more suitable for SMI examination. It is hoped that this will be one of the earliest studies to assess the clinical performance of the latest version of SMI.</p>","PeriodicalId":11885,"journal":{"name":"European journal of breast health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8734522/pdf/ejbh-18-48.pdf","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European journal of breast health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4274/ejbh.galenos.2021.2021-6-1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Objective: In this prospective study, the diagnostic performance of the new version of superb microvascular imaging (SMI) in differentiating malignant from benign lesions was evaluated.

Material and methods: Ninety breast lesions were included. During color SMI examination, both free-hand region of interest (ROI) and box ROI were used. Vascular index (VI) values were obtained from the lesion using both types of ROI and from normal breast tissue via box ROI. VI values, monochrome SMI grading and histopathological results were compared. The efficacy of color SMI and monochrome SMI was investigated in differentiating between benign and malignant breast lesions.

Results: The cut-off value, in the differentiation of benign and malignant lesions with color SMI was 0.50 for box ROI, while it was 0.30 for free-hand ROI. The specificity of VI values obtained with box ROI was higher than that of free-hand ROI when differentiating malignant lesions from benign. Comparison of VI values from a lesion and from normal breast tissue showed that VI values in malignant lesions were significantly higher (p<0.05). The VI values of benign lesions and VI values of normal breast tissue were similar. There was a statistically significant relationship between monochrome SMI grading and the malignancy or benign status of the lesion (p<0.001).

Conclusion: Drawing the lesion circumference free-hand using a free-shape ROI did not enhance the sensitivity and specificity. Contrary to popular belief, a more easy and practical measurement method may be more suitable for SMI examination. It is hoped that this will be one of the earliest studies to assess the clinical performance of the latest version of SMI.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
精湛的微血管成像对鉴别乳腺良恶性病变的重要性。
目的:在本前瞻性研究中,评价新型超细微血管成像(SMI)在鉴别良恶性病变中的诊断价值。材料和方法:纳入90例乳腺病变。在彩色SMI检测中,使用了自由手感兴趣区域(ROI)和盒感兴趣区域(box ROI)。血管指数(VI)值是通过两种类型的ROI和正常乳腺组织通过箱形ROI获得的。比较VI值、单色SMI分级及组织病理学结果。探讨彩色和单色SMI在鉴别乳腺良恶性病变中的作用。结果:用彩色SMI区分良恶性病变时,箱形ROI的临界值为0.50,徒手ROI的临界值为0.30。箱形ROI在鉴别良恶性病变时的特异性高于徒手ROI。病变与正常乳腺组织的VI值比较显示,恶性病变的VI值明显高于正常乳腺组织(p结论:使用自由形状ROI徒手绘制病变周长并不能提高灵敏度和特异性。与人们普遍认为的相反,一种更简单实用的测量方法可能更适合于SMI的检测。希望这将是最早评估最新版本的SMI临床表现的研究之一。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A Rare Case of Concurrent Lupus Mastitis and Sarcoidosis in a 62-Year-Old Female High Levels of Superoxide Dismutase 2 Are Associated With Worse Prognosis in Patients With Breast Cancer The Effect of Informative Mobile App Use on Anxiety, Distress, and Quality of Life of Women With Breast Cancer Bioinformatic Investigation of Genetic Changes in Paraoxonase Genes in Breast Cancer and Breast Cancer Subtypes Skin Staining After Injection of Superparamagnetic Iron Oxide for Sentinel Lymph Node Dissection: A Retrospective Study of Two Protocols for Injection and Long-Term Follow-Up
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1