Efficacy of Adjuvant Transarterial Chemoembolization after Radical Hepatectomy in Solitary Hepatocellular Carcinoma Patients: A Retrospective Study.

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q2 SURGERY Journal of Investigative Surgery Pub Date : 2022-06-01 Epub Date: 2022-01-25 DOI:10.1080/08941939.2021.2021334
Guifang Zeng, Baojia Zou, Yongliang Li, En Lin, Xialei Liu, Peiping Li, Jiafan Chen, Baimeng Zhang, Yingbin Jia, Chaonong Cai, Jian Li
{"title":"Efficacy of Adjuvant Transarterial Chemoembolization after Radical Hepatectomy in Solitary Hepatocellular Carcinoma Patients: A Retrospective Study.","authors":"Guifang Zeng,&nbsp;Baojia Zou,&nbsp;Yongliang Li,&nbsp;En Lin,&nbsp;Xialei Liu,&nbsp;Peiping Li,&nbsp;Jiafan Chen,&nbsp;Baimeng Zhang,&nbsp;Yingbin Jia,&nbsp;Chaonong Cai,&nbsp;Jian Li","doi":"10.1080/08941939.2021.2021334","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> More and more studies have suggested that hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients with high-risk recurrence factors can benefit the most from postoperative adjuvant transarterial chemoembolization (PA-TACE) for its potential effect in delaying cancer recurrence. However, it remains unclear if solitary HCC (SHCC) patients particularly those without high-risk recurrence factors should also receive PA-TACE. This study aimed to analyze the efficacy of PA-TACE in them. <b>Methods:</b> Retrospectively, we enrolled 123 SHCC patients who either received radical hepatectomy alone (No TACE group, n = 39) or followed by PA-TACE (PA-TACE group, n = 84) in our institution. Prognostic risk factors, disease-free survival (DFS), and overall survival (OS) were analyzed using the Cox proportional hazard regression model, the Kaplan-Meier method, and the log-rank test. <b>Results:</b> Liver cirrhosis was the only independent risk factor for SHCC patients. Overall, the PA-TACE group had no improved OS (<i>P</i> = 0.977) but worse DFS compared with the No TACE group (<i>P</i> = 0.045). Consistently, in subgroup analysis, SHCC patients with negative microvascular invasion (MVI), tumor size ≤ 5 cm and preoperative alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) < 400 ng/ml had similar OS (<i>P</i> = 0.466, <i>P</i> = 0.864, <i>P</i> = 0.488, respectively) but even worse DFS (<i>P</i> = 0.035, <i>P</i> = 0.040, <i>P</i> = 0.019, respectively) than those in the No TACE group. Besides, there was no significant difference in DFS and OS between the two groups of SHCC patients with liver cirrhosis (<i>P</i> = 0.342, <i>P</i> = 0.941, respectively). <b>Conclusions:</b> PA-TACE may not improve the long-term survival of SHCC patients, but may even potentially promote their postoperative tumor recurrence, especially for those with MVI-negative, tumor size ≤ 5 cm, and preoperative AFP < 400 ng/ml.</p>","PeriodicalId":16200,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Investigative Surgery","volume":"35 6","pages":"1208-1216"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Investigative Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08941939.2021.2021334","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/1/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Background: More and more studies have suggested that hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients with high-risk recurrence factors can benefit the most from postoperative adjuvant transarterial chemoembolization (PA-TACE) for its potential effect in delaying cancer recurrence. However, it remains unclear if solitary HCC (SHCC) patients particularly those without high-risk recurrence factors should also receive PA-TACE. This study aimed to analyze the efficacy of PA-TACE in them. Methods: Retrospectively, we enrolled 123 SHCC patients who either received radical hepatectomy alone (No TACE group, n = 39) or followed by PA-TACE (PA-TACE group, n = 84) in our institution. Prognostic risk factors, disease-free survival (DFS), and overall survival (OS) were analyzed using the Cox proportional hazard regression model, the Kaplan-Meier method, and the log-rank test. Results: Liver cirrhosis was the only independent risk factor for SHCC patients. Overall, the PA-TACE group had no improved OS (P = 0.977) but worse DFS compared with the No TACE group (P = 0.045). Consistently, in subgroup analysis, SHCC patients with negative microvascular invasion (MVI), tumor size ≤ 5 cm and preoperative alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) < 400 ng/ml had similar OS (P = 0.466, P = 0.864, P = 0.488, respectively) but even worse DFS (P = 0.035, P = 0.040, P = 0.019, respectively) than those in the No TACE group. Besides, there was no significant difference in DFS and OS between the two groups of SHCC patients with liver cirrhosis (P = 0.342, P = 0.941, respectively). Conclusions: PA-TACE may not improve the long-term survival of SHCC patients, but may even potentially promote their postoperative tumor recurrence, especially for those with MVI-negative, tumor size ≤ 5 cm, and preoperative AFP < 400 ng/ml.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
单纯性肝癌根治术后经动脉化疗栓塞的疗效:回顾性研究。
背景:越来越多的研究表明,具有高危复发因素的肝细胞癌(HCC)患者术后辅助经动脉化疗栓塞(PA-TACE)具有延缓癌症复发的潜在作用,获益最大。然而,目前尚不清楚是否孤立性HCC (SHCC)患者,特别是那些没有高风险复发因素的患者也应该接受PA-TACE治疗。本研究旨在分析PA-TACE对其治疗效果。方法:回顾性纳入我院123例单行根治性肝切除术(未行肝移植组,n = 39)或随后行PA-TACE (PA-TACE组,n = 84)的SHCC患者。采用Cox比例风险回归模型、Kaplan-Meier法和log-rank检验分析预后危险因素、无病生存期(DFS)和总生存期(OS)。结果:肝硬化是SHCC患者唯一的独立危险因素。总体而言,PA-TACE组OS无改善(P = 0.977), DFS较no -TACE组差(P = 0.045)。与此一致,在亚组分析中,微血管侵袭(MVI)阴性、肿瘤大小≤5 cm、术前甲胎蛋白(AFP) < 400 ng/ml的SHCC患者的OS (P = 0.466、P = 0.864、P = 0.488)与No TACE组相似,但DFS更差(P = 0.035、P = 0.040、P = 0.019)。此外,两组SHCC合并肝硬化患者的DFS和OS差异无统计学意义(P = 0.342, P = 0.941)。结论:PA-TACE不能改善SHCC患者的长期生存,甚至可能促进其术后肿瘤复发,特别是对于mvi阴性、肿瘤大小≤5 cm、术前AFP < 400 ng/ml的患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
114
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Investigative Surgery publishes peer-reviewed scientific articles for the advancement of surgery, to the ultimate benefit of patient care and rehabilitation. It is the only journal that encompasses the individual and collaborative efforts of scientists in human and veterinary medicine, dentistry, basic and applied sciences, engineering, and law and ethics. The journal is dedicated to the publication of outstanding articles of interest to the surgical research community.
期刊最新文献
Anterior, Posterior and Anterior-Posterior Approaches for the Treatment of Thoracolumbar Burst Fractures: A Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. The HIF-1α/PKM2 Feedback Loop in Relation to EGFR Mutational Status in Lung Adenocarcinoma. Posttranscriptional Regulation of Intestinal Mucosal Growth and Adaptation by Noncoding RNAs in Critical Surgical Disorders. Statement of Retraction: Liver X Receptors Activation Attenuates Ischemia Reperfusion Injury of Liver Graft in Rats. Correlation Between Basal Metabolic Rate and Clinical Outcomes in Gastric Cancer Patients: A Retrospective Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1