Early Postoperative Complications of Peritoneal Dialysis Catheter Surgery Conducted by Nephrologists: A Single-Center Experience Over an Eight-Year Period.

Kiyomi Osako, Tsutomu Sakurada, Kenichiro Koitabashi, Shina Sueki, Yugo Shibagaki
{"title":"Early Postoperative Complications of Peritoneal Dialysis Catheter Surgery Conducted by Nephrologists: A Single-Center Experience Over an Eight-Year Period.","authors":"Kiyomi Osako,&nbsp;Tsutomu Sakurada,&nbsp;Kenichiro Koitabashi,&nbsp;Shina Sueki,&nbsp;Yugo Shibagaki","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The results of several recent studies indicate that the practice of peritoneal dialysis catheter (PDC) insertion by nephrologists is safe. However, few studies have addressed the important issue of safety in surgeries related to PD, including PDC removal and other types of surgery. In the present study, we aimed to verify whether the incidence of early postoperative complications for surgical procedures related to PD and performed by nephrologists meets the audit standards of clinical practice guidelines for peritoneal access.Between April 2008 and July 2016 at our hospital, 282 patients underwent various types of PD-related surgery conducted by 17 nephrologists. The surgery types were the Moncrief-Popovich technique (n = 74), PDC exteriorization (n = 62), conventional laparotomy insertion (n = 29), PDC removal (n = 70), partial replacement (n = 32), unroofing or cuff shaving (n = 7), and others (n = 8).Bowel perforation and significant hemorrhage did not occur at the time of PDC insertion and removal. Although peritonitis was not evident, exit-site and tunnel infection within 2 weeks of PDC insertion by conventional laparotomy or exteriorization after the Moncrief-Popovich technique occurred in 3 of 91 patients (3.3%). The PDC malfunctioned in 2 of 103 patients (1.9%) after the Moncrief-Popovich technique because of PDC occlusion with a fibrin plug. Dialysate leaks occurred in 2 of 103 patients (1.9%). Partial replacement and unroofing or cuff shaving for refractory PDC infection and other type of surgeries were not associated with serious complications.The incidence of complications after surgery related to PD was low at our institution. The incidences of complications met the audit standards in the guidelines, indicating that surgery by nephrologists is safe and effective.</p>","PeriodicalId":7361,"journal":{"name":"Advances in peritoneal dialysis. Conference on Peritoneal Dialysis","volume":"33 2017","pages":"26-30"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in peritoneal dialysis. Conference on Peritoneal Dialysis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The results of several recent studies indicate that the practice of peritoneal dialysis catheter (PDC) insertion by nephrologists is safe. However, few studies have addressed the important issue of safety in surgeries related to PD, including PDC removal and other types of surgery. In the present study, we aimed to verify whether the incidence of early postoperative complications for surgical procedures related to PD and performed by nephrologists meets the audit standards of clinical practice guidelines for peritoneal access.Between April 2008 and July 2016 at our hospital, 282 patients underwent various types of PD-related surgery conducted by 17 nephrologists. The surgery types were the Moncrief-Popovich technique (n = 74), PDC exteriorization (n = 62), conventional laparotomy insertion (n = 29), PDC removal (n = 70), partial replacement (n = 32), unroofing or cuff shaving (n = 7), and others (n = 8).Bowel perforation and significant hemorrhage did not occur at the time of PDC insertion and removal. Although peritonitis was not evident, exit-site and tunnel infection within 2 weeks of PDC insertion by conventional laparotomy or exteriorization after the Moncrief-Popovich technique occurred in 3 of 91 patients (3.3%). The PDC malfunctioned in 2 of 103 patients (1.9%) after the Moncrief-Popovich technique because of PDC occlusion with a fibrin plug. Dialysate leaks occurred in 2 of 103 patients (1.9%). Partial replacement and unroofing or cuff shaving for refractory PDC infection and other type of surgeries were not associated with serious complications.The incidence of complications after surgery related to PD was low at our institution. The incidences of complications met the audit standards in the guidelines, indicating that surgery by nephrologists is safe and effective.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
肾内科医生进行的腹膜透析导管手术的早期术后并发症:一项超过8年的单中心经验。
最近的几项研究结果表明,肾内科医生插入腹膜透析导管(PDC)的做法是安全的。然而,很少有研究涉及PD相关手术的安全问题,包括PDC切除和其他类型的手术。在本研究中,我们旨在验证肾脏科医师进行的PD相关手术的早期术后并发症发生率是否符合腹膜通路临床实践指南的审核标准。2008年4月至2016年7月,我院共有282名患者接受了由17名肾病专家进行的各种类型的pd相关手术。手术类型为Moncrief-Popovich技术(n = 74)、PDC外置术(n = 62)、常规剖腹插入术(n = 29)、PDC移除术(n = 70)、部分置换术(n = 32)、开腹或刮刀术(n = 7)及其他(n = 8)。植入和移除PDC时未发生肠穿孔和明显出血。虽然腹膜炎不明显,但91例患者中有3例(3.3%)在常规开腹或Moncrief-Popovich技术后外置PDC后2周内发生了出口部位和隧道感染。Moncrief-Popovich技术后,103例患者中有2例(1.9%)由于纤维蛋白塞阻塞PDC而出现PDC功能障碍。103例患者中有2例(1.9%)发生透析液渗漏。难治性PDC感染的部分置换术、去顶术或袖带刮除术和其他类型的手术与严重并发症无关。本院PD术后并发症发生率较低。并发症发生率符合指南审计标准,说明肾科医师手术安全有效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Changes in Peritoneal Transport and Peritoneal Damage in Japanese Patients Undergoing Peritoneal Dialysis Using Neutral-pH Dialysate: A Retrospective Cohort Study at Two Centers. Maintaining Peritoneal Dialysis Adequacy: The Process of Incremental Prescription. Comparison of Various Scaling Parameters and Energy Expenditure in Peritoneal Dialysis Patients. Prevention of Peritoneal Dialysis Drop-Out. Accuracy of a Newly-Introduced Oscillometric Device for the Estimation of Arterial Stiffness Indices in Patients on Peritoneal Dialysis: A Preliminary Validation Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1