Nutrition and Exercise Treatment of Sarcopenia in Hip Fracture Patients: Systematic Review.

Q2 Medicine Journal of Bone Metabolism Pub Date : 2022-05-01 Epub Date: 2022-05-31 DOI:10.11005/jbm.2022.29.2.63
Jun-Il Yoo, Yong-Chan Ha, Yonghan Cha
{"title":"Nutrition and Exercise Treatment of Sarcopenia in Hip Fracture Patients: Systematic Review.","authors":"Jun-Il Yoo,&nbsp;Yong-Chan Ha,&nbsp;Yonghan Cha","doi":"10.11005/jbm.2022.29.2.63","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study aimed to investigate nutritional or rehabilitation intervention protocols for hip fracture patients with sarcopenia and to analyze the effect of these protocols through a systematic review of studies that reported clinical results.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Studies were selected based on the following criteria: (1) study design: randomized controlled trials or non-randomized comparative studies; (2) study population: patients with hip fracture; (3) intervention: nutritional or rehabilitation; and (4) reporting the clinical outcomes and definition of sarcopenia.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 247 references initially identified from the selected databases, 5 randomized controlled studies and 2 comparative studies were selected for further investigation. The total number of patients was 497. We found 2 specific rehabilitation interventions, one medication intervention using erythropoietin, and 4 nutritional interventions using amino-acid or protein. Among the studies included in this systematic review, 2 studies did not find a clear statistical difference in assessment tools compared to controls after intervention. On the other hand, the rest of the studies positively interpreted the results for intervention. The most frequently used assessment tool for intervention was handgrip strength.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Although mainstream methods of intervention for sarcopenia include nutritional, exercise, and drug interventions, the validity of these interventions in elderly hip fractures has not been clearly proven. In addition, as most studies only reported short-term results, there is no consensus on the optimal long-term treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":15070,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Bone Metabolism","volume":"29 2","pages":"63-73"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/53/83/jbm-2022-29-2-63.PMC9208903.pdf","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Bone Metabolism","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11005/jbm.2022.29.2.63","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/5/31 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Background: This study aimed to investigate nutritional or rehabilitation intervention protocols for hip fracture patients with sarcopenia and to analyze the effect of these protocols through a systematic review of studies that reported clinical results.

Methods: Studies were selected based on the following criteria: (1) study design: randomized controlled trials or non-randomized comparative studies; (2) study population: patients with hip fracture; (3) intervention: nutritional or rehabilitation; and (4) reporting the clinical outcomes and definition of sarcopenia.

Results: Of the 247 references initially identified from the selected databases, 5 randomized controlled studies and 2 comparative studies were selected for further investigation. The total number of patients was 497. We found 2 specific rehabilitation interventions, one medication intervention using erythropoietin, and 4 nutritional interventions using amino-acid or protein. Among the studies included in this systematic review, 2 studies did not find a clear statistical difference in assessment tools compared to controls after intervention. On the other hand, the rest of the studies positively interpreted the results for intervention. The most frequently used assessment tool for intervention was handgrip strength.

Conclusions: Although mainstream methods of intervention for sarcopenia include nutritional, exercise, and drug interventions, the validity of these interventions in elderly hip fractures has not been clearly proven. In addition, as most studies only reported short-term results, there is no consensus on the optimal long-term treatment.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
营养和运动治疗髋部骨折患者肌肉减少症:系统综述。
背景:本研究旨在探讨营养或康复干预方案对髋部骨折骨骼肌减少症患者的影响,并通过系统回顾报告临床结果的研究来分析这些方案的效果。方法:根据以下标准选择研究:(1)研究设计:随机对照试验或非随机比较研究;(2)研究人群:髋部骨折患者;(3)干预:营养或康复;(4)报道肌少症的临床结局和定义。结果:从数据库中初步识别的247篇文献中,选择了5篇随机对照研究和2篇比较研究进行进一步研究。患者总数为497例。我们发现2种特定的康复干预,1种药物干预使用促红细胞生成素,4种营养干预使用氨基酸或蛋白质。本系统综述纳入的研究中,有2项研究未发现干预后评估工具与对照组相比有明显的统计学差异。另一方面,其余的研究积极地解释了干预的结果。最常用的干预评估工具是握力。结论:尽管肌肉减少症的主流干预方法包括营养、运动和药物干预,但这些干预措施在老年髋部骨折中的有效性尚未得到明确证实。此外,由于大多数研究仅报告了短期结果,因此对于最佳的长期治疗方法尚无共识。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Bone Metabolism
Journal of Bone Metabolism Medicine-Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
23
期刊最新文献
Incretin-Based Therapies: A Promising Approach for Modulating Oxidative Stress and Insulin Resistance in Sarcopenia. Zoledronate Therapy in Osteogenesis Imperfecta: Perspectives in Indonesia Tertiary Hospital. Age- and Sex-Related Volumetric Density Differences in Trabecular and Cortical Bone of the Proximal Femur in Healthy Population. Clinical Utility of Bone Turnover Markers in Chronic Kidney Disease. Discriminatory Accuracy of Fracture Risk Assessment Tool in Asian Populations: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1