Contamination of equipment in emergency settings: an exploratory study with a targeted automated intervention.

Chidi Obasi, Allison Agwu, Wale Akinpelu, Roger Hammons, Clyde Clark, Ralph Etienne-cummings, Peter Hill, Richard Rothman, Stella Babalola, Tracy Ross, Karen Carroll, Bolanle Asiyanbola
{"title":"Contamination of equipment in emergency settings: an exploratory study with a targeted automated intervention.","authors":"Chidi Obasi,&nbsp;Allison Agwu,&nbsp;Wale Akinpelu,&nbsp;Roger Hammons,&nbsp;Clyde Clark,&nbsp;Ralph Etienne-cummings,&nbsp;Peter Hill,&nbsp;Richard Rothman,&nbsp;Stella Babalola,&nbsp;Tracy Ross,&nbsp;Karen Carroll,&nbsp;Bolanle Asiyanbola","doi":"10.1186/1750-1164-3-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Despite standard manual decontamination, hospital equipment remains contaminated with microorganisms, contributing to nosocomial transmission and hospital acquired infections. This has the potential to negate the effects of healthcare workers' hand-washing protocols. In order to decrease the likelihood of equipment contamination, there has been a rise in the use of disposable pieces of equipment, especially non-critical disposables. However, these carry a significant cost, both a direct financial cost (running into billions of dollars), as well as a cost to the environment. This is important because we hope to contain the cost of healthcare, one way to do that, is to look to the hospitals themselves, for innovative solutions that maintain the standard of care.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To develop and evaluate the effectiveness of an simple decontamination device for use with portable hospital equipment, by comparing rates of residual contamination after use of the novel device versus those seen with standard manual decontamination methods.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The Self-cleaning Unit for the Decontamination of Small instruments (SUDS) is a user-friendly, automated instrument developed via multi-disciplinary collaboration for decontamination in the clinical area. Pre- and post- utilization of portable medical equipment in an emergency department (ED) setting were cultured. To evaluate durability of the decrease in antimicrobial contamination, objects were re-cultured 48 hours after SUDS cleaning and following re-introduction into the clinical setting.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After manual decontamination, 25% (23/91) of the tested objects in the ED were found to be culture positive with clinically significant microorganisms(CSO). Fifteen percent (ED) of non-critical equipment tested had multiple organisms. Following the use of SUDS, the colonization rate decreased to 0%. Following SUDS treatment and re-introduction into the clinical settings, after 48 hours the contamination rates as reflected by the cultures remained 0%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Standard non-critical equipment is contaminated with clinically significant microorganisms. The SUDS device allows for effective and durable decontamination of hospital equipment of varying sizes in the clinical area without disrupting patient care.</p>","PeriodicalId":87428,"journal":{"name":"Annals of surgical innovation and research","volume":" ","pages":"8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/1750-1164-3-8","citationCount":"18","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of surgical innovation and research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/1750-1164-3-8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 18

Abstract

Background: Despite standard manual decontamination, hospital equipment remains contaminated with microorganisms, contributing to nosocomial transmission and hospital acquired infections. This has the potential to negate the effects of healthcare workers' hand-washing protocols. In order to decrease the likelihood of equipment contamination, there has been a rise in the use of disposable pieces of equipment, especially non-critical disposables. However, these carry a significant cost, both a direct financial cost (running into billions of dollars), as well as a cost to the environment. This is important because we hope to contain the cost of healthcare, one way to do that, is to look to the hospitals themselves, for innovative solutions that maintain the standard of care.

Objective: To develop and evaluate the effectiveness of an simple decontamination device for use with portable hospital equipment, by comparing rates of residual contamination after use of the novel device versus those seen with standard manual decontamination methods.

Methods: The Self-cleaning Unit for the Decontamination of Small instruments (SUDS) is a user-friendly, automated instrument developed via multi-disciplinary collaboration for decontamination in the clinical area. Pre- and post- utilization of portable medical equipment in an emergency department (ED) setting were cultured. To evaluate durability of the decrease in antimicrobial contamination, objects were re-cultured 48 hours after SUDS cleaning and following re-introduction into the clinical setting.

Results: After manual decontamination, 25% (23/91) of the tested objects in the ED were found to be culture positive with clinically significant microorganisms(CSO). Fifteen percent (ED) of non-critical equipment tested had multiple organisms. Following the use of SUDS, the colonization rate decreased to 0%. Following SUDS treatment and re-introduction into the clinical settings, after 48 hours the contamination rates as reflected by the cultures remained 0%.

Conclusion: Standard non-critical equipment is contaminated with clinically significant microorganisms. The SUDS device allows for effective and durable decontamination of hospital equipment of varying sizes in the clinical area without disrupting patient care.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
紧急情况下设备污染:一项有针对性的自动干预的探索性研究。
背景:尽管标准的人工消毒,医院设备仍然被微生物污染,导致医院传播和医院获得性感染。这有可能抵消医护人员洗手方案的效果。为了减少设备污染的可能性,一次性设备的使用有所增加,特别是非关键的一次性设备。然而,这些都带来了巨大的成本,既包括直接的财政成本(高达数十亿美元),也包括环境成本。这很重要,因为我们希望控制医疗保健的成本,实现这一目标的一种方法,是关注医院本身,寻找保持护理标准的创新解决方案。目的:通过比较新型设备使用后的残留污染率与标准手动去污方法的残留污染率,开发和评估便携式医院设备使用的简单去污装置的有效性。方法:小型仪器去污自洁装置(SUDS)是一种用户友好的自动化仪器,是多学科合作开发的用于临床去污的仪器。培养了在急诊科(ED)环境中便携式医疗设备的前后使用情况。为了评估抗菌污染减少的持久性,在SUDS清洁后48小时重新培养对象,然后重新引入临床环境。结果:经人工消毒后,25%(23/91)的检测对象临床显著微生物(CSO)培养阳性。15% (ED)的非关键设备测试有多种生物。使用SUDS后,定植率降至0%。经过SUDS治疗并重新引入临床环境后,48小时后,培养物反映的污染率仍然为0%。结论:标准非关键设备被临床重要微生物污染。该SUDS设备允许有效和持久的去污医院设备的不同大小的临床领域,而不中断病人的护理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Novel treatments for complications after bariatric surgery Assessment of central venous catheterization in a simulated model using a motion-tracking device: an experimental validation study Current Outcomes of Laparoscopic Duodenal Switch Benefits of intraoperative endoscopy: case report and review of 300 sleeves gastrectomies Development of automated postoperative enteral nutrition: restricting feeding site inflow to match peristaltic outflow
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1