Adopting a competency-based model: mapping curricula and assessing student progress.

Elizabeth H Bradley, Emily Cherlin, Susan H Busch, Andrew Epstein, Bradley Helfand, William D White
{"title":"Adopting a competency-based model: mapping curricula and assessing student progress.","authors":"Elizabeth H Bradley,&nbsp;Emily Cherlin,&nbsp;Susan H Busch,&nbsp;Andrew Epstein,&nbsp;Bradley Helfand,&nbsp;William D White","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Much attention has been focused on integrating competency-based curricula into educational programs in health management. Achieving the benefits of competency-based curricula requires substantial effort to identify competencies that are both specific and comprehensive, and that reflect consensus among faculty and stakeholders. The objective of this paper is to describe an approach to competency-based curriculum development and monitoring of students' progress toward competency achievement. Our approach identifies 20 competency areas, organized in technical, analytical/conceptual, and interpersonal domains. We demonstrate how individual courses can be mapped to these 20 competency areas and provide survey data on students' and graduates' self-rated competencies. We find the self-rated competencies of new graduates were significantly higher than the self-rated competencies of entering students in 17 of the 20 areas. Our work illustrates an approach to competency-based education that is feasible and helpful for program planning and evaluation. The list of competencies is tractable; the mapping of competencies to didactic coursework and practical experiences is clear and reflects reasonable consensus among faculty and preceptors. Finally, the approach is flexible, as competency areas can be added and removed to be responsive to new research evidence and the changing needs of the field.</p>","PeriodicalId":75078,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of health administration education","volume":"25 1","pages":"37-51"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of health administration education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Much attention has been focused on integrating competency-based curricula into educational programs in health management. Achieving the benefits of competency-based curricula requires substantial effort to identify competencies that are both specific and comprehensive, and that reflect consensus among faculty and stakeholders. The objective of this paper is to describe an approach to competency-based curriculum development and monitoring of students' progress toward competency achievement. Our approach identifies 20 competency areas, organized in technical, analytical/conceptual, and interpersonal domains. We demonstrate how individual courses can be mapped to these 20 competency areas and provide survey data on students' and graduates' self-rated competencies. We find the self-rated competencies of new graduates were significantly higher than the self-rated competencies of entering students in 17 of the 20 areas. Our work illustrates an approach to competency-based education that is feasible and helpful for program planning and evaluation. The list of competencies is tractable; the mapping of competencies to didactic coursework and practical experiences is clear and reflects reasonable consensus among faculty and preceptors. Finally, the approach is flexible, as competency areas can be added and removed to be responsive to new research evidence and the changing needs of the field.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
采用以能力为基础的模式:绘制课程和评估学生的进步。
将基于能力的课程整合到健康管理的教育项目中已经引起了很大的关注。要实现以能力为基础的课程的好处,需要付出大量的努力来确定既具体又全面的能力,并反映教师和利益相关者之间的共识。本文的目的是描述一种以能力为基础的课程开发和监控学生能力成就进展的方法。我们的方法确定了20个能力领域,按技术、分析/概念和人际关系领域进行组织。我们展示了如何将个别课程映射到这20个能力领域,并提供了关于学生和毕业生自我评估能力的调查数据。我们发现,在20个领域中,有17个领域应届毕业生的自评能力显著高于入学学生的自评能力。我们的工作说明了一种基于能力的教育方法,这种方法是可行的,并且有助于项目的规划和评估。能力列表是易于处理的;能力与教学课程和实践经验的映射是清晰的,反映了教师和导师之间的合理共识。最后,该方法是灵活的,因为能力领域可以添加和删除,以响应新的研究证据和该领域不断变化的需求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Work-life balance among health administration faculty before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. Student perceptions of a teaching electronic medical record in Health Administration education. Faculty salaries in health administration: trends and correlates 2015-2021. Supporting Health System Transformation: The development of an integrated interprofessional curriculum inclusive of public health students. WORKPLACE INCIVILITY EXPERIENCED BY HEALTH ADMINISTRATION FACULTY.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1