Diabetes Education and Support Tele-Visit Needs Differ in Duration, Content, and Satisfaction in Older Versus Younger Adults.

Telemedicine reports Pub Date : 2022-05-09 eCollection Date: 2022-01-01 DOI:10.1089/tmr.2022.0007
Margaret Greenfield, Diana Stuber, Danielle Stegman-Barber, Karen Kemmis, Belinda Matthews, Carly B Feuerstein-Simon, Prasenjit Saha, Beth Wells, Teresa McArthur, Christopher P Morley, Ruth S Weinstock
{"title":"Diabetes Education and Support Tele-Visit Needs Differ in Duration, Content, and Satisfaction in Older Versus Younger Adults.","authors":"Margaret Greenfield,&nbsp;Diana Stuber,&nbsp;Danielle Stegman-Barber,&nbsp;Karen Kemmis,&nbsp;Belinda Matthews,&nbsp;Carly B Feuerstein-Simon,&nbsp;Prasenjit Saha,&nbsp;Beth Wells,&nbsp;Teresa McArthur,&nbsp;Christopher P Morley,&nbsp;Ruth S Weinstock","doi":"10.1089/tmr.2022.0007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Diabetes education and support are critical components of diabetes care. During the COVID-19 pandemic, when telemedicine took the place of in-person visits, remote Certified Diabetes Care and Education Specialist (CDCES) services were offered to address diabetes education and support. Specific needs for older adults, including the time required to provide education and support remotely, have not been previously reported.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Adults with diabetes (primarily insulin-requiring) were referred to remote CDCESs. Utilization was individualized based on patient needs and preferences. Topics discussed, patient satisfaction, and time spent in each tele-visit were evaluated by diabetes type, age, sex, insurance type, glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c), pump, and continuous glucose monitor (CGM) usage. <i>t</i>-Tests, one-way analysis of variance, and Pearson correlations were employed as appropriate.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Adults (<i>n</i> = 982; mean age 48.4 years, 41.0% age ≥55 years) with type 1 diabetes (<i>n</i> = 846) and type 2 diabetes mellitus (<i>n</i> = 136, 86.0% insulin-treated), 50.8% female; 19.0% Medicaid, 29.1% Medicare, 48.9% private insurance; mean HbA1c 8.4% (standard deviation 1.9); and 46.6% pump and 64.5% CGM users had 2203 tele-visits with remote CDCESs over 5 months. Of those referred, 272 (21.7%) could not be reached or did not receive education/support. Older age (≥55 years), compared with 36-54 year olds and 18-35 year olds, respectively, was associated with more tele-visits (mean 2.6 vs. 2.2 and 1.8) and more time/tele-visits (mean 20.4 min vs. 16.5 min and 14.8 min; <i>p</i> < 0.001) as was coverage with Medicare (mean 2.8 visits) versus private insurance (mean 2.0 visits; <i>p</i> < 0.001) and lower participant satisfaction. The total mean time spent with remote CDCESs was 53.1, 37.4, and 26.2 min for participants aged ≥55, 36-54, and 18-35 years, respectively. During remote tele-visits, the most frequently discussed topics per participant were CGM and insulin pump use (73.4% and 49.7%). After adjustment for sex and diabetes type, older age was associated with lack of access to a computer, tablet, smartphone, or internet (<i>p</i> < 0.001), and need for more education related to CGM (<i>p</i> < 0.001), medications (<i>p</i> = 0.015), hypoglycemia (<i>p</i> = 0.044), and hyperglycemia (<i>p</i> = 0.048).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Most remote CDCES tele-visits were successfully completed. Older adults/those with Medicare required more time to fulfill educational needs. Although 85.7% of individual sessions lasted <30 min, which does not meet current Medicare requirements for reimbursement, multiple visits were common with a total time of >50 min for most older participants. This suggests that new reimbursement models are needed. Education/support needs of insulin-treated older adults should be a focus of future studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":22295,"journal":{"name":"Telemedicine reports","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9153986/pdf/","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Telemedicine reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/tmr.2022.0007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Background: Diabetes education and support are critical components of diabetes care. During the COVID-19 pandemic, when telemedicine took the place of in-person visits, remote Certified Diabetes Care and Education Specialist (CDCES) services were offered to address diabetes education and support. Specific needs for older adults, including the time required to provide education and support remotely, have not been previously reported.

Methods: Adults with diabetes (primarily insulin-requiring) were referred to remote CDCESs. Utilization was individualized based on patient needs and preferences. Topics discussed, patient satisfaction, and time spent in each tele-visit were evaluated by diabetes type, age, sex, insurance type, glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c), pump, and continuous glucose monitor (CGM) usage. t-Tests, one-way analysis of variance, and Pearson correlations were employed as appropriate.

Results: Adults (n = 982; mean age 48.4 years, 41.0% age ≥55 years) with type 1 diabetes (n = 846) and type 2 diabetes mellitus (n = 136, 86.0% insulin-treated), 50.8% female; 19.0% Medicaid, 29.1% Medicare, 48.9% private insurance; mean HbA1c 8.4% (standard deviation 1.9); and 46.6% pump and 64.5% CGM users had 2203 tele-visits with remote CDCESs over 5 months. Of those referred, 272 (21.7%) could not be reached or did not receive education/support. Older age (≥55 years), compared with 36-54 year olds and 18-35 year olds, respectively, was associated with more tele-visits (mean 2.6 vs. 2.2 and 1.8) and more time/tele-visits (mean 20.4 min vs. 16.5 min and 14.8 min; p < 0.001) as was coverage with Medicare (mean 2.8 visits) versus private insurance (mean 2.0 visits; p < 0.001) and lower participant satisfaction. The total mean time spent with remote CDCESs was 53.1, 37.4, and 26.2 min for participants aged ≥55, 36-54, and 18-35 years, respectively. During remote tele-visits, the most frequently discussed topics per participant were CGM and insulin pump use (73.4% and 49.7%). After adjustment for sex and diabetes type, older age was associated with lack of access to a computer, tablet, smartphone, or internet (p < 0.001), and need for more education related to CGM (p < 0.001), medications (p = 0.015), hypoglycemia (p = 0.044), and hyperglycemia (p = 0.048).

Discussion: Most remote CDCES tele-visits were successfully completed. Older adults/those with Medicare required more time to fulfill educational needs. Although 85.7% of individual sessions lasted <30 min, which does not meet current Medicare requirements for reimbursement, multiple visits were common with a total time of >50 min for most older participants. This suggests that new reimbursement models are needed. Education/support needs of insulin-treated older adults should be a focus of future studies.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
老年人与年轻人的糖尿病教育和远程访问支持需求在持续时间、内容和满意度上存在差异。
背景:糖尿病教育和支持是糖尿病护理的重要组成部分。在2019冠状病毒病大流行期间,当远程医疗取代面对面就诊时,提供了远程认证糖尿病护理和教育专家服务,以解决糖尿病教育和支持问题。老年人的具体需求,包括远程提供教育和支持所需的时间,以前没有报道过。方法:成人糖尿病患者(主要是需要胰岛素的)被转介到远程CDCESs。根据患者的需要和偏好进行个体化治疗。通过糖尿病类型、年龄、性别、保险类型、糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)、泵和连续血糖监测仪(CGM)的使用来评估讨论的主题、患者满意度和每次远程就诊的时间。适当时采用t检验、单向方差分析和Pearson相关性。结果:成人(n = 982;平均年龄48.4岁,41.0%年龄≥55岁)合并1型糖尿病(n = 846)和2型糖尿病(n = 136, 86.0%胰岛素治疗),女性50.8%;19.0%的医疗补助,29.1%的医疗保险,48.9%的私人保险;平均HbA1c 8.4%(标准差1.9);46.6%的泵用户和64.5%的CGM用户在5个月内远程CDCESs就诊2203次。在转介人士中,有272名(21.7%)无法联络或没有接受教育/支援。年龄越大(≥55岁),分别与36-54岁和18-35岁的人相比,与更多的远程就诊(平均2.6比2.2和1.8)和更多的时间/远程就诊(平均20.4分钟比16.5分钟和14.8分钟;p p p p p = 0.015),低血糖(p = 0.044),高血糖(p = 0.048)。讨论:大多数远程CDCES远程访问成功完成。老年人/那些有医疗保险的人需要更多的时间来满足教育需求。尽管85.7%的个人会议持续了50分钟对于大多数老年参与者。这表明需要新的报销模式。接受胰岛素治疗的老年人的教育/支持需求应成为未来研究的重点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Correction to : “A Prioritized Patient-Centered Research Agenda to Reduce Disparities in Telehealth Uptake:Results from a National Consensus Conference” by Kristin L. Rising et al. Telemed Report 2023;4(1): 387–395; doi: 10.1089/tmr.2023.0051 The Impact of Waiting Times on Behavioral Outcomes for Children with Otitis Media: Results from an Urban Ear, Nose, and Throat Telehealth Service Factors Associated with the Digital Patient Experience of Virtual Care Across Specialties. Telemedicine in Brazil: Teleconsultations at the Largest University Hospital in the Country. Achieving Digital Health Equity by Personalizing the Patient Experience.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1