Telecoaching Improves Positive Pressure Ventilation Performance During Simulated Neonatal Resuscitations.

Telemedicine reports Pub Date : 2022-03-07 eCollection Date: 2022-01-01 DOI:10.1089/tmr.2021.0049
Mark Castera, Megan M Gray, Carri Gest, Patrick Motz, Taylor Sawyer, Rachel Umoren
{"title":"Telecoaching Improves Positive Pressure Ventilation Performance During Simulated Neonatal Resuscitations.","authors":"Mark Castera,&nbsp;Megan M Gray,&nbsp;Carri Gest,&nbsp;Patrick Motz,&nbsp;Taylor Sawyer,&nbsp;Rachel Umoren","doi":"10.1089/tmr.2021.0049","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Positive pressure ventilation (PPV) is a critical skill for neonatal resuscitation. We hypothesized that telecoaching would improve PPV performance in neonatal providers during simulated neonatal resuscitations.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Level IV neonatal intensive care unit (NICU).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This prospective crossover study included 14 experienced NICU nurses and respiratory therapists who performed PPV on a mannequin that recorded parameters of ventilation efficiency. Participants were randomized to practice independently (control) or with live feedback from a remote facilitator through audiovisual connection (intervention) and then switched to the opposite group. Participants' mask leak percentage, ventilation rates, and pressure delivery were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The primary outcome of mask leak percentage was significantly increased in the telecoaching group (19% [interquartile range {IQR} 14-59.25] vs. 100% [IQR 88-100] leak, <i>p</i> = 0.0001). The secondary outcome of peak inspiratory pressure (PIP) delivery was also increased (median 27.6 [IQR 23.5-34.7] vs. 23.3 [IQR 19.1-32.8] cmH<sub>2</sub>O, <i>p</i> < 0.001). Differences in ventilation rates were not statistically significant (55 vs. 58 breaths/min, <i>p</i> = 0.51).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Participants demonstrated better PPV performance during telecoaching with less mask leak. The intervention group also had higher measured peak inspiratory pressures. Telecoaching may be a feasible method to provide real-time feedback to health care providers during simulated neonatal resuscitations.</p><p><strong>Hypothesis: </strong>Neonatal providers who receive telecoaching during simulated resuscitations will perform PPV more effectively than those who do not receive telecoaching.</p>","PeriodicalId":22295,"journal":{"name":"Telemedicine reports","volume":" ","pages":"55-61"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9004288/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Telemedicine reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/tmr.2021.0049","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Positive pressure ventilation (PPV) is a critical skill for neonatal resuscitation. We hypothesized that telecoaching would improve PPV performance in neonatal providers during simulated neonatal resuscitations.

Setting: Level IV neonatal intensive care unit (NICU).

Methods: This prospective crossover study included 14 experienced NICU nurses and respiratory therapists who performed PPV on a mannequin that recorded parameters of ventilation efficiency. Participants were randomized to practice independently (control) or with live feedback from a remote facilitator through audiovisual connection (intervention) and then switched to the opposite group. Participants' mask leak percentage, ventilation rates, and pressure delivery were analyzed.

Results: The primary outcome of mask leak percentage was significantly increased in the telecoaching group (19% [interquartile range {IQR} 14-59.25] vs. 100% [IQR 88-100] leak, p = 0.0001). The secondary outcome of peak inspiratory pressure (PIP) delivery was also increased (median 27.6 [IQR 23.5-34.7] vs. 23.3 [IQR 19.1-32.8] cmH2O, p < 0.001). Differences in ventilation rates were not statistically significant (55 vs. 58 breaths/min, p = 0.51).

Conclusion: Participants demonstrated better PPV performance during telecoaching with less mask leak. The intervention group also had higher measured peak inspiratory pressures. Telecoaching may be a feasible method to provide real-time feedback to health care providers during simulated neonatal resuscitations.

Hypothesis: Neonatal providers who receive telecoaching during simulated resuscitations will perform PPV more effectively than those who do not receive telecoaching.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
远程教学改善模拟新生儿复苏期间的正压通气表现。
正压通气(PPV)是新生儿复苏的一项关键技术。我们假设远程教学可以提高新生儿提供者在模拟新生儿复苏期间的PPV表现。环境:四级新生儿重症监护病房(NICU)。方法:这项前瞻性交叉研究包括14名经验丰富的NICU护士和呼吸治疗师,他们对人体模型进行了PPV,并记录了通气效率参数。参与者被随机分为独立练习(对照组)或通过视听连接获得远程促进者的实时反馈(干预组),然后切换到相反组。分析了参与者的口罩泄漏率、通气量和压力输送。结果:远程教学组主要预后指标口罩泄漏率显著提高(19%[四分位数间距{IQR} 14-59.25] vs. 100% [IQR 88-100]泄漏,p = 0.0001)。吸入峰压(PIP)输出的次要终点也增加(中位数27.6 [IQR 23.5-34.7] vs. 23.3 [IQR 19.1-32.8] cmH2O, p = 0.51)。结论:被试在远程教学中表现出较好的PPV表现,且掩膜泄漏较少。干预组也有更高的测量峰值吸气压力。远程教学可能是一种可行的方法,提供实时反馈给卫生保健提供者在模拟新生儿复苏。假设:在模拟复苏期间接受远程教学的新生儿提供者比未接受远程教学的新生儿提供者更有效地执行PPV。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Correction to : “A Prioritized Patient-Centered Research Agenda to Reduce Disparities in Telehealth Uptake:Results from a National Consensus Conference” by Kristin L. Rising et al. Telemed Report 2023;4(1): 387–395; doi: 10.1089/tmr.2023.0051 The Impact of Waiting Times on Behavioral Outcomes for Children with Otitis Media: Results from an Urban Ear, Nose, and Throat Telehealth Service Factors Associated with the Digital Patient Experience of Virtual Care Across Specialties. Telemedicine in Brazil: Teleconsultations at the Largest University Hospital in the Country. Achieving Digital Health Equity by Personalizing the Patient Experience.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1