Medical Scribe Impact on Provider Efficiency in Outpatient Radiation Oncology Clinics Before and During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Telemedicine reports Pub Date : 2022-01-07 eCollection Date: 2022-01-01 DOI:10.1089/tmr.2021.0035
Max Devine, Elyn Wang, Rie von Eyben, Hilary P Bagshaw
{"title":"Medical Scribe Impact on Provider Efficiency in Outpatient Radiation Oncology Clinics Before and During the COVID-19 Pandemic.","authors":"Max Devine,&nbsp;Elyn Wang,&nbsp;Rie von Eyben,&nbsp;Hilary P Bagshaw","doi":"10.1089/tmr.2021.0035","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Purpose/Objectives:</b> Medical documentation has become increasingly challenging for providers, particularly with changes to telemedicine visit formats during the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic. Medical scribes may help mitigate this burden. Our objective was to determine how scribes affect provider efficiency during the COVID-19 pandemic. <b>Materials/Methods:</b> Providers completed a survey in February 2020 (S1, prepandemic) and 1 year into the COVID-19 pandemic in February 2021 (S2, during pandemic). S1 evaluated perceived impact of scribes on clerical work, medical documentation, and efficiency during office visits using the Likert scale. S2 also addressed scribe use during telemedicine visits. Provider time spent on documentation with or without a scribe was evaluated using a five-level ordinal scale. Provider response was assessed using descriptive frequency statistics. Fisher's exact test was used to compare categorical variables. Analysis was performed using SAS version 9.4 (SAS Institute, Inc., Cary, NC). All tests were two sided with an alpha level of 0.05. <b>Results:</b> Fifty-eight providers responded to the surveys: 36 (62%) for S1 and 22 (38%) for S2. Scribe use decreased perceived clerical work and facilitated chart review, and recording of physical examination findings, note documentation, and improved efficiency, both before and during the pandemic (<i>p</i> = 0.5, <i>p</i> = 0.7, <i>p</i> = 0.8, <i>p</i> = 0.8, <i>p</i> = 0.9, respectively). Scribe use significantly decreased time to complete documentation prepandemic (<i>p</i> = 0.002) and during the pandemic for both in-person (<i>p</i> ≤ 0.0001) and telemedicine visits (<i>p</i> = 0.0004). More providers took >60 min to complete medical documentation without the use of a scribe prepandemic (72% vs. 30% with a scribe, <i>p</i> = 0.006) and during the pandemic, after both in-person (40% vs. 0% with a scribe, <i>p</i> = 0.002) and telemedicine visits (35% vs. 0% with a scribe, <i>p</i> = 0.002). <b>Conclusions:</b> Scribe use decreases provider time spent on medical documentation and improves overall efficiency before and during the COVID-19 pandemic for both in-person and telemedicine visits. Integration of scribes into radiation oncology in-person and telemedicine clinics may improve provider satisfaction by reducing burden of documentation.</p>","PeriodicalId":22295,"journal":{"name":"Telemedicine reports","volume":" ","pages":"1-6"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8989091/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Telemedicine reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/tmr.2021.0035","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose/Objectives: Medical documentation has become increasingly challenging for providers, particularly with changes to telemedicine visit formats during the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic. Medical scribes may help mitigate this burden. Our objective was to determine how scribes affect provider efficiency during the COVID-19 pandemic. Materials/Methods: Providers completed a survey in February 2020 (S1, prepandemic) and 1 year into the COVID-19 pandemic in February 2021 (S2, during pandemic). S1 evaluated perceived impact of scribes on clerical work, medical documentation, and efficiency during office visits using the Likert scale. S2 also addressed scribe use during telemedicine visits. Provider time spent on documentation with or without a scribe was evaluated using a five-level ordinal scale. Provider response was assessed using descriptive frequency statistics. Fisher's exact test was used to compare categorical variables. Analysis was performed using SAS version 9.4 (SAS Institute, Inc., Cary, NC). All tests were two sided with an alpha level of 0.05. Results: Fifty-eight providers responded to the surveys: 36 (62%) for S1 and 22 (38%) for S2. Scribe use decreased perceived clerical work and facilitated chart review, and recording of physical examination findings, note documentation, and improved efficiency, both before and during the pandemic (p = 0.5, p = 0.7, p = 0.8, p = 0.8, p = 0.9, respectively). Scribe use significantly decreased time to complete documentation prepandemic (p = 0.002) and during the pandemic for both in-person (p ≤ 0.0001) and telemedicine visits (p = 0.0004). More providers took >60 min to complete medical documentation without the use of a scribe prepandemic (72% vs. 30% with a scribe, p = 0.006) and during the pandemic, after both in-person (40% vs. 0% with a scribe, p = 0.002) and telemedicine visits (35% vs. 0% with a scribe, p = 0.002). Conclusions: Scribe use decreases provider time spent on medical documentation and improves overall efficiency before and during the COVID-19 pandemic for both in-person and telemedicine visits. Integration of scribes into radiation oncology in-person and telemedicine clinics may improve provider satisfaction by reducing burden of documentation.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在COVID-19大流行之前和期间,医疗记录对门诊放射肿瘤学诊所提供者效率的影响
目的/目标:医疗记录对提供者来说越来越具有挑战性,特别是在持续的COVID-19大流行期间远程医疗访问格式发生变化。医疗抄写员可能有助于减轻这种负担。我们的目标是确定抄写员在COVID-19大流行期间如何影响提供者效率。材料/方法:供应商在2020年2月(S1,大流行前)和2021年2月(S2,大流行期间)完成了一项调查。S1使用李克特量表评估抄写员在办公室访问期间对文书工作、医疗文件和效率的感知影响。S2还讨论了远程医疗访问中抄写员的使用。提供者在文档上花费的时间用一个五级的顺序量表来评估。使用描述性频率统计评估提供者的反应。费雪精确检验用于比较分类变量。使用SAS 9.4版(SAS Institute, Inc., Cary, NC)进行分析。所有检验均为双侧检验,α水平为0.05。结果:58家供应商回应了调查:36家(62%)为S1, 22家(38%)为S2。在大流行之前和期间,使用抄写员减少了文书工作,便利了图表审查、体检结果记录、笔记记录,并提高了效率(p = 0.5, p = 0.7, p = 0.8, p = 0.8, p = 0.9)。使用Scribe可显著缩短大流行前(p = 0.002)和大流行期间面对面(p≤0.0001)和远程医疗就诊(p = 0.0004)完成文件记录的时间。在大流行前(72%对30%,使用抄写员,p = 0.006)和大流行期间,在面对面(40%对0%,使用抄写员,p = 0.002)和远程医疗就诊(35%对0%,使用抄写员,p = 0.002)之后,更多的提供者在没有使用抄写员的情况下花费>60分钟完成医疗文件。结论:在COVID-19大流行之前和期间,使用Scribe减少了提供者花费在医疗文件上的时间,并提高了现场和远程医疗就诊的整体效率。将抄写员整合到放射肿瘤学面对面和远程医疗诊所可以通过减少文件负担来提高提供者的满意度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Correction to : “A Prioritized Patient-Centered Research Agenda to Reduce Disparities in Telehealth Uptake:Results from a National Consensus Conference” by Kristin L. Rising et al. Telemed Report 2023;4(1): 387–395; doi: 10.1089/tmr.2023.0051 The Impact of Waiting Times on Behavioral Outcomes for Children with Otitis Media: Results from an Urban Ear, Nose, and Throat Telehealth Service Factors Associated with the Digital Patient Experience of Virtual Care Across Specialties. Telemedicine in Brazil: Teleconsultations at the Largest University Hospital in the Country. Achieving Digital Health Equity by Personalizing the Patient Experience.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1