Telemedicine Rapid Assessment in the Emergency Department: A Pilot Study.

Telemedicine reports Pub Date : 2021-11-19 eCollection Date: 2021-01-01 DOI:10.1089/tmr.2021.0029
Devin Peuser, Paul Mangasarian, Jorge Otero, Tamara Scott, Joshua W Elder
{"title":"Telemedicine Rapid Assessment in the Emergency Department: A Pilot Study.","authors":"Devin Peuser,&nbsp;Paul Mangasarian,&nbsp;Jorge Otero,&nbsp;Tamara Scott,&nbsp;Joshua W Elder","doi":"10.1089/tmr.2021.0029","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> The objective of this study is to evaluate a rapid assessment telemedicine system in the emergency department for safety, workflow disruption, and satisfaction level by clinicians, staff, and patients. <b>Methods:</b> After consent is obtained, the patient and telemedicine emergency physician are connected on a Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act-compliant video conference for a rapid assessment, including history of present illness, review of systems, and past medical history. The telemedicine physician initiates orders based on these data. Patient data collected include age, gender, chief complaint, Emergency Severity Index, door to telemedicine physician time, door to in-person physician time, length of stay, left without being seen (LWBS) status, and satisfaction scores. Nurses were assessed for workflow interruptions and communication gaps. In-person physicians were assessed regarding perceived missed information in patient management, perceived workflow interruptions, and satisfaction. <b>Results:</b> Convenience sampling when participating physicians were on-shift resulted in 22 patients enrolled out of 25 approached over 2 months. No patients LWBS, and no in-person physicians perceived missed information in management. Satisfaction was well scored in all evaluated parties, with no score below a 4.77 out of 5 for any of the categories evaluated. Only one case interrupted the workflow of the on-site physician. <b>Discussion:</b> Telemedicine rapid assessment was found to be safe, efficient, and associated with high satisfaction. These results warrant study on a larger scale with a control group to statistically assess differences in outcome metrics such as LWBS rates. If effective, this approach could provide a novel and flexible physician-staffing tool.</p>","PeriodicalId":22295,"journal":{"name":"Telemedicine reports","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9049807/pdf/","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Telemedicine reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/tmr.2021.0029","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: The objective of this study is to evaluate a rapid assessment telemedicine system in the emergency department for safety, workflow disruption, and satisfaction level by clinicians, staff, and patients. Methods: After consent is obtained, the patient and telemedicine emergency physician are connected on a Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act-compliant video conference for a rapid assessment, including history of present illness, review of systems, and past medical history. The telemedicine physician initiates orders based on these data. Patient data collected include age, gender, chief complaint, Emergency Severity Index, door to telemedicine physician time, door to in-person physician time, length of stay, left without being seen (LWBS) status, and satisfaction scores. Nurses were assessed for workflow interruptions and communication gaps. In-person physicians were assessed regarding perceived missed information in patient management, perceived workflow interruptions, and satisfaction. Results: Convenience sampling when participating physicians were on-shift resulted in 22 patients enrolled out of 25 approached over 2 months. No patients LWBS, and no in-person physicians perceived missed information in management. Satisfaction was well scored in all evaluated parties, with no score below a 4.77 out of 5 for any of the categories evaluated. Only one case interrupted the workflow of the on-site physician. Discussion: Telemedicine rapid assessment was found to be safe, efficient, and associated with high satisfaction. These results warrant study on a larger scale with a control group to statistically assess differences in outcome metrics such as LWBS rates. If effective, this approach could provide a novel and flexible physician-staffing tool.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
急诊部远程医疗快速评估:一项试点研究。
背景:本研究的目的是评估急诊科快速评估远程医疗系统的安全性、工作流程中断以及临床医生、员工和患者的满意度。方法:征得同意后,通过符合《健康保险可携带性和责任法案》的视频会议将患者和远程医疗急诊医生联系起来,进行快速评估,包括当前病史、系统回顾和既往病史。远程医疗医生根据这些数据启动医嘱。收集的患者数据包括年龄、性别、主诉、急诊严重程度指数、上门到远程医疗医生的时间、上门到现场医生的时间、住院时间、未就诊状态(LWBS)和满意度得分。评估护士的工作流程中断和沟通差距。评估了现场医生在患者管理中感知到的遗漏信息、感知到的工作流程中断和满意度。结果:当参与的医生轮班时,方便的抽样结果导致25名患者中有22名患者在2个月内入组。没有患者出现LWBS,也没有现场医生发现在管理中遗漏了信息。在所有被评估的方面,满意度都得到了很好的得分,在任何评估类别的得分都没有低于4.77分(满分为5分)。只有一个病例打断了现场医生的工作流程。讨论:发现远程医疗快速评估安全、有效且满意度高。这些结果值得在更大规模的对照组中进行研究,以统计评估结果指标(如LWBS率)的差异。如果有效,这种方法可以提供一种新颖而灵活的医生配置工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Correction to : “A Prioritized Patient-Centered Research Agenda to Reduce Disparities in Telehealth Uptake:Results from a National Consensus Conference” by Kristin L. Rising et al. Telemed Report 2023;4(1): 387–395; doi: 10.1089/tmr.2023.0051 The Impact of Waiting Times on Behavioral Outcomes for Children with Otitis Media: Results from an Urban Ear, Nose, and Throat Telehealth Service Factors Associated with the Digital Patient Experience of Virtual Care Across Specialties. Telemedicine in Brazil: Teleconsultations at the Largest University Hospital in the Country. Achieving Digital Health Equity by Personalizing the Patient Experience.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1