Measuring Four Personal Opportunities for Adults With Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities.

Seb M Prohn, Parthenia Dinora, Michael D Broda, Matthew Bogenschutz, Sarah Lineberry
{"title":"Measuring Four Personal Opportunities for Adults With Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities.","authors":"Seb M Prohn,&nbsp;Parthenia Dinora,&nbsp;Michael D Broda,&nbsp;Matthew Bogenschutz,&nbsp;Sarah Lineberry","doi":"10.1352/2326-6988-10.1.19","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study tests an empirically derived model for measuring personal opportunities for people with intellectual and developmental disabilities (IDD) using National Core Indicators In-Person Survey (NCI-IPS) state and national datasets. The four personal opportunities measured, (a) privacy rights, (b) everyday choice, (c) community participation, and (d) expanded friendships, were informed by existing conceptualizations of service as well as NCI-IPS measures. Analyses confirmed the fit of a four-factor model and demonstrated that factors were significantly and positively correlated. To demonstrate the relationships between personal opportunities and personal and environmental characteristics, we estimated a structural equation model that regressed personal opportunities on age, gender, place of residence, and level of intellectual disability. Implications for using personal opportunities for evaluating service quality of IDD systems are discussed.</p>","PeriodicalId":93183,"journal":{"name":"Inclusion (Washington, D.C.)","volume":"10 1","pages":"19-34"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9201575/pdf/nihms-1717546.pdf","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Inclusion (Washington, D.C.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1352/2326-6988-10.1.19","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

This study tests an empirically derived model for measuring personal opportunities for people with intellectual and developmental disabilities (IDD) using National Core Indicators In-Person Survey (NCI-IPS) state and national datasets. The four personal opportunities measured, (a) privacy rights, (b) everyday choice, (c) community participation, and (d) expanded friendships, were informed by existing conceptualizations of service as well as NCI-IPS measures. Analyses confirmed the fit of a four-factor model and demonstrated that factors were significantly and positively correlated. To demonstrate the relationships between personal opportunities and personal and environmental characteristics, we estimated a structural equation model that regressed personal opportunities on age, gender, place of residence, and level of intellectual disability. Implications for using personal opportunities for evaluating service quality of IDD systems are discussed.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
测量智力和发育障碍成人的四种个人机会。
本研究使用国家核心指标面对面调查(NCI-IPS)各州和国家数据集,测试了一个经验推导的模型,用于衡量智力和发育障碍(IDD)患者的个人机会。测量的四种个人机会,(a)隐私权,(b)日常选择,(c)社区参与和(d)扩大友谊,是由现有的服务概念以及NCI-IPS措施提供的。分析证实了四因素模型的拟合,并表明各因素显著正相关。为了证明个人机会与个人和环境特征之间的关系,我们估计了一个结构方程模型,该模型将个人机会与年龄、性别、居住地和智力残疾水平进行回归。讨论了利用个人机会评价国际直拨电话系统服务质量的意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Emergency COVID-19 Pandemic Changes to Home- and Community-Based Services for People With Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities It “Goes Both Ways”: The Impact of Peer-Mediated Interventions on Peers Barriers to Community Participation for Adults Aging With an Intellectual Disability in Ireland: A Longitudinal Study Perspectives of College Students With Intellectual Disability on Peer Mentoring Relationships Résumés en Français
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1