Shalini Singh, Nomita Chandhiok, Balwan Singh Dhillon
{"title":"Obstetric fistula in India: current scenario.","authors":"Shalini Singh, Nomita Chandhiok, Balwan Singh Dhillon","doi":"10.1007/s00192-009-1000-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>India lacks prevalence and incidence data on obstetric fistula, a near miss maternal mortality.</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>Retrospective data were collected on obstetric fistula cases from hospital records of 24 tertiary care facilities during the period 2000-2006.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 717 women underwent genital fistula repair, but medical records could be retrieved for only 401 (56%) cases. States of Bihar, Uttar Pradesh, and West Bengal had more than 100 cases each, while Karnataka had none. Obstructed labor caused nearly 97% of genital fistulae while pelvic surgery and accidental trauma contributed to 1.5% cases each. Commonest type of fistula was genitourinary (86.6%), others included rectovaginal (12.1%) and both genitourinary and rectovaginal fistulae (1.2%). Fistula repair was attempted in 322 (83%) cases of whom 289 (89.71%) were successfully repaired.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>There is a need for ongoing systematic data collection mechanism like a fistula registry that would provide facility-based prevalence and incidence, time trends, and changes in etiology of fistula. This information could be used for implementation of prevention and treatment strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":73495,"journal":{"name":"International urogynecology journal and pelvic floor dysfunction","volume":" ","pages":"1403-5"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/s00192-009-1000-0","citationCount":"11","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International urogynecology journal and pelvic floor dysfunction","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-009-1000-0","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2009/9/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11
Abstract
Background: India lacks prevalence and incidence data on obstetric fistula, a near miss maternal mortality.
Methodology: Retrospective data were collected on obstetric fistula cases from hospital records of 24 tertiary care facilities during the period 2000-2006.
Results: Overall, 717 women underwent genital fistula repair, but medical records could be retrieved for only 401 (56%) cases. States of Bihar, Uttar Pradesh, and West Bengal had more than 100 cases each, while Karnataka had none. Obstructed labor caused nearly 97% of genital fistulae while pelvic surgery and accidental trauma contributed to 1.5% cases each. Commonest type of fistula was genitourinary (86.6%), others included rectovaginal (12.1%) and both genitourinary and rectovaginal fistulae (1.2%). Fistula repair was attempted in 322 (83%) cases of whom 289 (89.71%) were successfully repaired.
Conclusions: There is a need for ongoing systematic data collection mechanism like a fistula registry that would provide facility-based prevalence and incidence, time trends, and changes in etiology of fistula. This information could be used for implementation of prevention and treatment strategies.