Development and Testing of a Tool for Assessing and Resolving Medication-Related Problems in Older Adults in an Ambulatory Care Setting: The Individualized Medication Assessment and Planning (iMAP) Tool

Ginny D. Crisp PharmD , Jena Ivey Burkhart PharmD , Denise A. Esserman PhD , Morris Weinberger PhD , Mary T. Roth PharmD
{"title":"Development and Testing of a Tool for Assessing and Resolving Medication-Related Problems in Older Adults in an Ambulatory Care Setting: The Individualized Medication Assessment and Planning (iMAP) Tool","authors":"Ginny D. Crisp PharmD ,&nbsp;Jena Ivey Burkhart PharmD ,&nbsp;Denise A. Esserman PhD ,&nbsp;Morris Weinberger PhD ,&nbsp;Mary T. Roth PharmD","doi":"10.1016/j.amjopharm.2011.10.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Medication is one of the most important interventions for improving the health of older adults, yet it has great potential for causing harm. Clinical pharmacists are well positioned to engage in medication assessment and planning. The Individualized Medication Assessment and Planning (iMAP) tool was developed to aid clinical pharmacists in documenting medication-related problems (MRPs) and associated recommendations.</p></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><p>The purpose of our study was to assess the reliability and usability of the iMAP tool in classifying MRPs and associated recommendations in older adults in the ambulatory care setting.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Three cases, representative of older adults seen in an outpatient setting, were developed. Pilot testing was conducted and a “gold standard” key developed. Eight eligible pharmacists consented to participate in the study. They were instructed to read each case, make an assessment of MRPs, formulate a plan, and document the information using the iMAP tool. Inter-rater reliability was assessed for each case, comparing the pharmacists' identified MRPs and recommendations to the gold standard. Consistency of categorization across reviewers was assessed using the κ statistic or percent agreement.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The mean κ across the 8 pharmacists in classifying MRPs compared with the gold standard was 0.74 (range, 0.54–1.00) for case 1 and 0.68 (range, 0.36–1.00) for case 2, indicating substantial agreement. For case 3, percent agreement was 63% (range, 40%–100%). The mean κ across the 8 pharmacists when classifying recommendations compared with the gold standard was 0.87 (range, 0.58–1.00) for case 1 and 0.88 (range, 0.75–1.00) for case 2, indicating almost perfect agreement. For case 3, percent agreement was 68% (range, 40%–100%). Clinical pharmacists found the iMAP tool easy to use.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The iMAP tool provides a reliable and standardized approach for clinical pharmacists to use in the ambulatory care setting to classify MRPs and associated recommendations. Future studies will explore the predictive validity of the tool on clinical outcomes such as health care utilization.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":50811,"journal":{"name":"American Journal Geriatric Pharmacotherapy","volume":"9 6","pages":"Pages 451-460"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.amjopharm.2011.10.003","citationCount":"26","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal Geriatric Pharmacotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1543594611001747","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 26

Abstract

Background

Medication is one of the most important interventions for improving the health of older adults, yet it has great potential for causing harm. Clinical pharmacists are well positioned to engage in medication assessment and planning. The Individualized Medication Assessment and Planning (iMAP) tool was developed to aid clinical pharmacists in documenting medication-related problems (MRPs) and associated recommendations.

Objective

The purpose of our study was to assess the reliability and usability of the iMAP tool in classifying MRPs and associated recommendations in older adults in the ambulatory care setting.

Methods

Three cases, representative of older adults seen in an outpatient setting, were developed. Pilot testing was conducted and a “gold standard” key developed. Eight eligible pharmacists consented to participate in the study. They were instructed to read each case, make an assessment of MRPs, formulate a plan, and document the information using the iMAP tool. Inter-rater reliability was assessed for each case, comparing the pharmacists' identified MRPs and recommendations to the gold standard. Consistency of categorization across reviewers was assessed using the κ statistic or percent agreement.

Results

The mean κ across the 8 pharmacists in classifying MRPs compared with the gold standard was 0.74 (range, 0.54–1.00) for case 1 and 0.68 (range, 0.36–1.00) for case 2, indicating substantial agreement. For case 3, percent agreement was 63% (range, 40%–100%). The mean κ across the 8 pharmacists when classifying recommendations compared with the gold standard was 0.87 (range, 0.58–1.00) for case 1 and 0.88 (range, 0.75–1.00) for case 2, indicating almost perfect agreement. For case 3, percent agreement was 68% (range, 40%–100%). Clinical pharmacists found the iMAP tool easy to use.

Conclusions

The iMAP tool provides a reliable and standardized approach for clinical pharmacists to use in the ambulatory care setting to classify MRPs and associated recommendations. Future studies will explore the predictive validity of the tool on clinical outcomes such as health care utilization.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
开发和测试在门诊环境中评估和解决老年人药物相关问题的工具:个体化药物评估和计划(iMAP)工具
药物治疗是改善老年人健康的最重要的干预措施之一,但它也有很大的潜在危害。临床药师有能力从事药物评估和计划工作。开发了个体化用药评估和计划(iMAP)工具,以帮助临床药师记录药物相关问题(MRPs)和相关建议。目的本研究的目的是评估iMAP工具在老年人门诊护理环境中mrp分类和相关建议方面的可靠性和可用性。方法研究了3例在门诊就诊的老年人的代表性病例。进行了试点测试,并开发了“黄金标准”钥匙。8名符合条件的药剂师同意参加研究。他们被要求阅读每个病例,对mrp进行评估,制定计划,并使用iMAP工具记录信息。评估每个病例的内部信度,将药剂师确定的mrp和建议与金标准进行比较。使用κ统计量或一致性百分比评估评论者分类的一致性。结果8名药师对mrp分类与金标准比较,病例1的平均κ为0.74(范围0.54 ~ 1.00),病例2的平均κ为0.68(范围0.36 ~ 1.00),基本一致。对于案例3,百分比的一致性为63%(范围,40%-100%)。与金标准相比,8名药剂师在对建议进行分类时的平均κ值在病例1为0.87(范围,0.58-1.00),在病例2为0.88(范围,0.75-1.00),表明几乎完全一致。对于案例3,百分比的一致性为68%(范围,40%-100%)。临床药师发现iMAP工具易于使用。结论iMAP工具为临床药师提供了一种可靠和标准化的方法,可用于门诊护理环境中对mrp和相关推荐进行分类。未来的研究将探索该工具对临床结果(如卫生保健利用)的预测有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
American Journal Geriatric Pharmacotherapy
American Journal Geriatric Pharmacotherapy GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY-PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Author Index Subject Index Editorial Board Adverse Effects of Analgesics Commonly Used by Older Adults With Osteoarthritis: Focus on Non-Opioid and Opioid Analgesics Effect of Combination Fluticasone Propionate and Salmeterol or Inhaled Corticosteroids on Asthma-Related Outcomes in a Medicare-Eligible Population
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1