Review of 100 cases of single port laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Journal of the Korean Surgical Society Pub Date : 2012-03-01 Epub Date: 2012-02-27 DOI:10.4174/jkss.2012.82.3.179
Eun Jung Koo, Soon Hwa Youn, Yang Hyun Baek, Young Hoon Roh, Hong Jo Choi, Young Hoon Kim, Ghap Joong Jung
{"title":"Review of 100 cases of single port laparoscopic cholecystectomy.","authors":"Eun Jung Koo,&nbsp;Soon Hwa Youn,&nbsp;Yang Hyun Baek,&nbsp;Young Hoon Roh,&nbsp;Hong Jo Choi,&nbsp;Young Hoon Kim,&nbsp;Ghap Joong Jung","doi":"10.4174/jkss.2012.82.3.179","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Single port laparoscopic cholecystectomy (SPLC) is a new advanced technique in laparoscopic surgery. Many laparoscopic surgeons seek to gain skill in this new technique. However, little data has been accumulated and published formally yet. This article reports the achievement of 100 cases of SPLC with the hopes it will encourage laparoscopic surgery centers in the early adoption of SPLC.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective review of 100 prospectively selected cases of SPLC was carried out. All patients had received elective SPLC by a single surgeon in our center from May 2009 to December 2010. Our review suggests patients' character, perioperative data and postoperative outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Forty-two men and 58 women with an average age of 45.8 years had received SPLC. Their mean body mass index (BMI) was 23.85 kg/m(2). The mean operating time took 76.75 minutes. However, operating time was decreased according to the increase of experience of SPLC cases. Twenty-one cases were converted to multi-port surgery. BMI, age, previous low abdominal surgical history did not seem to affect conversion to multi-port surgery. No cases were converted to open surgery. Mean duration of hospital stay was 2.18 days. Six patients had experienced complications from which they had recovered after conservative treatment.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>SPLC is a safe and practicable technique. The operating time is moderate and can be reduced with the surgeon's experience. At first, strict criteria was indicated for SPLC, however, with surgical experience, the criteria and area of SPLC can be broadened. SPLC is occupying a greater domain of conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy.</p>","PeriodicalId":49157,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Korean Surgical Society","volume":"82 3","pages":"179-84"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.4174/jkss.2012.82.3.179","citationCount":"21","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Korean Surgical Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4174/jkss.2012.82.3.179","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2012/2/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 21

Abstract

Purpose: Single port laparoscopic cholecystectomy (SPLC) is a new advanced technique in laparoscopic surgery. Many laparoscopic surgeons seek to gain skill in this new technique. However, little data has been accumulated and published formally yet. This article reports the achievement of 100 cases of SPLC with the hopes it will encourage laparoscopic surgery centers in the early adoption of SPLC.

Methods: A retrospective review of 100 prospectively selected cases of SPLC was carried out. All patients had received elective SPLC by a single surgeon in our center from May 2009 to December 2010. Our review suggests patients' character, perioperative data and postoperative outcomes.

Results: Forty-two men and 58 women with an average age of 45.8 years had received SPLC. Their mean body mass index (BMI) was 23.85 kg/m(2). The mean operating time took 76.75 minutes. However, operating time was decreased according to the increase of experience of SPLC cases. Twenty-one cases were converted to multi-port surgery. BMI, age, previous low abdominal surgical history did not seem to affect conversion to multi-port surgery. No cases were converted to open surgery. Mean duration of hospital stay was 2.18 days. Six patients had experienced complications from which they had recovered after conservative treatment.

Conclusion: SPLC is a safe and practicable technique. The operating time is moderate and can be reduced with the surgeon's experience. At first, strict criteria was indicated for SPLC, however, with surgical experience, the criteria and area of SPLC can be broadened. SPLC is occupying a greater domain of conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术100例分析。
目的:单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术(SPLC)是腹腔镜手术中一项新的先进技术。许多腹腔镜外科医生试图掌握这项新技术。然而,迄今为止,有关数据的积累和正式发表还很少。本文报告了100例SPLC的成果,希望它能鼓励腹腔镜手术中心尽早采用SPLC。方法:对前瞻性选择的100例SPLC病例进行回顾性分析。所有患者均于2009年5月至2010年12月在本中心由一名外科医生择期行SPLC。我们回顾了患者的特征、围手术期数据和术后结果。结果:男性42例,女性58例,平均年龄45.8岁。平均身体质量指数(BMI)为23.85 kg/m(2)。平均手术时间76.75分钟。但手术时间随手术经验的增加而缩短。21例转为多口手术。BMI、年龄、以前的下腹部手术史似乎不影响多口手术的转换。无一例转为开腹手术。平均住院时间为2.18天。6例患者出现并发症,经保守治疗后恢复。结论:SPLC是一种安全可行的方法。手术时间适中,可根据术者经验缩短。起初,SPLC有严格的诊断标准,但随着手术经验的积累,可以拓宽SPLC的诊断标准和范围。SPLC在传统腹腔镜胆囊切除术中占有更大的份额。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊最新文献
Multidisciplinary team approach in breast cancer: a nationwide survey in Korea. Impact of pretransplant rituximab induction on highly sensitized kidney recipients: comparison with non-rituximab group. Influence of gastrectomy for stomach cancer on type 2 diabetes mellitus for patients with a body mass index less than 30 kg/m(2). Influence of surgical manipulation and surgical modality on the molecular detection of circulating tumor cells from colorectal cancer. Ten year outcomes after bypass surgery in aortoiliac occlusive disease.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1