Comparison of conventional radiography combined with ultrasonography versus nonenhanced helical computed tomography in evaluation of patients with renal colic.

Urological Research Pub Date : 2012-10-01 Epub Date: 2012-03-14 DOI:10.1007/s00240-012-0460-8
Sinan Ekici, Orhun Sinanoglu
{"title":"Comparison of conventional radiography combined with ultrasonography versus nonenhanced helical computed tomography in evaluation of patients with renal colic.","authors":"Sinan Ekici,&nbsp;Orhun Sinanoglu","doi":"10.1007/s00240-012-0460-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The aim of this study is to determine whether kidneys ureters bladder X-ray (KUB) film combined with ultrasound (US) can be effectively used in evaluation of renal colic and miss stones with clinically significant size identified on nonenhanced computed tomography (NECT) in patients with urolithiasis. This retrospective study evaluated the clinical and radiological records of 300 patients at our institution undergoing KUB and/or US and/or NECT for the evaluation of renal colic from June 2007 to December 2010. Of patients with negative findings on KUB and/or US, 22 had renal stones on NECT (mean size 4.4 mm, range 3-8), 3 had lower ureteral stone (mean size 3.3 mm, range 2-5). In patients with isolated suspicious renal ectasia without stone image, two had renal stone on NECT (mean size 4 mm, range 2-6), 5 had upper ureteral stone (mean size 4.4 mm, range 4-6), 7 had middle ureteral stone (mean size 3.7 mm, range 3-4) and 14 had lower ureteral stone (mean size 4 mm, range 2-6). The cost-effective and almost radiation-free combination of KUB and US should be preferred for diagnosis of urolithiasis, as it detects most of the ureteral and renal calculi which are clinically significant.</p>","PeriodicalId":23412,"journal":{"name":"Urological Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/s00240-012-0460-8","citationCount":"51","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urological Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00240-012-0460-8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2012/3/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 51

Abstract

The aim of this study is to determine whether kidneys ureters bladder X-ray (KUB) film combined with ultrasound (US) can be effectively used in evaluation of renal colic and miss stones with clinically significant size identified on nonenhanced computed tomography (NECT) in patients with urolithiasis. This retrospective study evaluated the clinical and radiological records of 300 patients at our institution undergoing KUB and/or US and/or NECT for the evaluation of renal colic from June 2007 to December 2010. Of patients with negative findings on KUB and/or US, 22 had renal stones on NECT (mean size 4.4 mm, range 3-8), 3 had lower ureteral stone (mean size 3.3 mm, range 2-5). In patients with isolated suspicious renal ectasia without stone image, two had renal stone on NECT (mean size 4 mm, range 2-6), 5 had upper ureteral stone (mean size 4.4 mm, range 4-6), 7 had middle ureteral stone (mean size 3.7 mm, range 3-4) and 14 had lower ureteral stone (mean size 4 mm, range 2-6). The cost-effective and almost radiation-free combination of KUB and US should be preferred for diagnosis of urolithiasis, as it detects most of the ureteral and renal calculi which are clinically significant.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
常规x线结合超声与非增强螺旋ct对肾绞痛患者评价的比较。
本研究的目的是确定肾输尿管膀胱x线(KUB)片联合超声(US)是否可以有效地用于评估尿石症患者在非增强计算机断层扫描(NECT)上发现的肾绞痛和有临床意义大小的遗漏结石。本回顾性研究评估了从2007年6月至2010年12月在我院接受KUB和/或US和/或NECT评估肾绞痛的300例患者的临床和放射学记录。在KUB和/或US阴性的患者中,22例在NECT上有肾结石(平均大小4.4 mm,范围3-8),3例有输尿管下部结石(平均大小3.3 mm,范围2-5)。在没有结石显像的孤立性可疑肾扩张患者中,2例在neect上有肾结石(平均大小4mm,范围2-6),5例为输尿管上部结石(平均大小4.4 mm,范围4-6),7例为输尿管中部结石(平均大小3.7 mm,范围3-4),14例为输尿管下部结石(平均大小4mm,范围2-6)。对于尿石症的诊断,KUB和US的联合检查具有成本效益和几乎无辐射的特点,因为它能检出大多数具有临床意义的输尿管结石和肾结石。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Urological Research
Urological Research 医学-泌尿学与肾脏学
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊最新文献
A simple and rapid colorimetric method for determination of phytate in urine. Hyperoxaluric rats do not exhibit alterations in renal expression patterns of Slc26a1 (SAT1) mRNA or protein. Studies on the in vitro and in vivo antiurolithic activity of Holarrhena antidysenterica. Ureteroscopy-assisted retrograde nephrostomy (UARN) for an incomplete double ureter. Urgent shock wave lithotripsy as first-line treatment for ureteral stones: a meta-analysis of 570 patients.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1