[The bioethical problems of umbilical cord blood: a study of institutional statements].

IF 0.3 Q4 ETHICS Cuadernos de Bioetica Pub Date : 2022-05-01 DOI:10.30444/CB.122
Rafael Amo Usanos
{"title":"[The bioethical problems of umbilical cord blood: a study of institutional statements].","authors":"Rafael Amo Usanos","doi":"10.30444/CB.122","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This article aims to explore the bioethical problems that are concentrated around the Umbilical Cord Blood. The publication in the year 2020 in Spain of the new National Umbilical Cord Blood Plan recalls the current status of the issue. The bioethical problems of umbilical cord blood have not been specially studied, rather there are few studies in this regard and above all they have focused on the controversy over its autologous use and its storage in private banks. This work, the result of reading twenty-six institutional statements from the most diverse institutions in different countries, offers a detailed and systematic enumeration of the bioethical problems that arise around the life of umbilical cord blood and proposes, fundamentally, a classification with an evolutionary criterion, that is, following the course of the Umbilical Cord Blood, from its donation to its use, passing through the problems of donors and storage. The sources used cover a period from 1998 to 2019 and are practically all the existing ones. This work offers a conclusive analysis of a synchronic nature, in which the bioethical constants are detected in the 31 years analyzed, specifically the principles of autonomy and solidarity, in addition to the so-called bioethics of expectations; and another of a diachronic nature in which the bioethical nuclei in which the questions are concentrated stand out: the lack of personalistic principles and the conflict between freedom and solidarity.</p>","PeriodicalId":42510,"journal":{"name":"Cuadernos de Bioetica","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cuadernos de Bioetica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30444/CB.122","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ETHICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article aims to explore the bioethical problems that are concentrated around the Umbilical Cord Blood. The publication in the year 2020 in Spain of the new National Umbilical Cord Blood Plan recalls the current status of the issue. The bioethical problems of umbilical cord blood have not been specially studied, rather there are few studies in this regard and above all they have focused on the controversy over its autologous use and its storage in private banks. This work, the result of reading twenty-six institutional statements from the most diverse institutions in different countries, offers a detailed and systematic enumeration of the bioethical problems that arise around the life of umbilical cord blood and proposes, fundamentally, a classification with an evolutionary criterion, that is, following the course of the Umbilical Cord Blood, from its donation to its use, passing through the problems of donors and storage. The sources used cover a period from 1998 to 2019 and are practically all the existing ones. This work offers a conclusive analysis of a synchronic nature, in which the bioethical constants are detected in the 31 years analyzed, specifically the principles of autonomy and solidarity, in addition to the so-called bioethics of expectations; and another of a diachronic nature in which the bioethical nuclei in which the questions are concentrated stand out: the lack of personalistic principles and the conflict between freedom and solidarity.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
[脐带血的生物伦理问题:机构声明的研究]。
本文旨在探讨围绕脐带血的生物伦理问题。西班牙将于2020年公布新的《国家脐带血计划》,回顾了这一问题的现状。脐带血的生物伦理问题并没有专门的研究,这方面的研究很少,尤其是集中在脐带血的自体使用和私人银行储存的争议上。这项工作是阅读了来自不同国家最多样化的机构的26个机构声明的结果,提供了一个详细和系统的脐带血生命周期中出现的生物伦理问题的列举,并提出了一个基本的进化标准分类,即遵循脐带血的过程,从捐赠到使用,通过献血者和储存的问题。所使用的来源涵盖了1998年至2019年的时间,几乎是所有现有的来源。这项工作提供了对共时性的结论性分析,其中在分析的31年中检测到生物伦理常数,特别是自治和团结的原则,以及所谓的期望生物伦理;另一种是历时性的,问题集中在生物伦理的核心中:缺乏个人主义原则以及自由与团结之间的冲突。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
20.00%
发文量
5
期刊介绍: La revista Cuadernos de Bioética, órgano oficial de la Asociación Española de Bioética y Ética Médica, publica cuatrimestralmente artículos y recensiones bibliográficas sobre todas las áreas de la bioética: fundamentación, ética de la investigación, bioética clínica, biojurídica, etc. Estos proceden de los aceptados en la revisión tutelada por los editores de la revista como de otros que por encargo el comité editorial solicite a sus autores. La edicion de la revista se financia con las aportaciones de los socios de AEBI.
期刊最新文献
[Bioethical issues of Covid-19 in Spain. A systematic review]. [Ethical and legal implications of digital mental health applications]. [Human reason versus arrogance technoscience and the replacement shadow. -Ethical evaluation and social control to regain power on the means and ends from the work of José Sanmartín]. [Response to: ″An egg is not a chicken and an embryo is not a child″]. [The proposal for a regulation on the recognition of parenthood: An attempt to recognize surrogacy in the European Union?]
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1