On-the-Job Evidence-Based Medicine Training for Clinician-Scientists of the Next Generation.

Q1 Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology Clinical Biochemist Reviews Pub Date : 2013-08-01
Elaine Yl Leung, Sadia M Malick, Khalid S Khan
{"title":"On-the-Job Evidence-Based Medicine Training for Clinician-Scientists of the Next Generation.","authors":"Elaine Yl Leung, Sadia M Malick, Khalid S Khan","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Clinical scientists are at the unique interface between laboratory science and frontline clinical practice for supporting clinical partnerships for evidence-based practice. In an era of molecular diagnostics and personalised medicine, evidence-based laboratory practice (EBLP) is also crucial in aiding clinical scientists to keep up-to-date with this expanding knowledge base. However, there are recognised barriers to the implementation of EBLP and its training. The aim of this review is to provide a practical summary of potential strategies for training clinician-scientists of the next generation. Current evidence suggests that clinically integrated evidence-based medicine (EBM) training is effective. Tailored e-learning EBM packages and evidence-based journal clubs have been shown to improve knowledge and skills of EBM. Moreover, e-learning is no longer restricted to computer-assisted learning packages. For example, social media platforms such as Twitter have been used to complement existing journal clubs and provide additional post-publication appraisal information for journals. In addition, the delivery of an EBLP curriculum has influence on its success. Although e-learning of EBM skills is effective, having EBM trained teachers available locally promotes the implementation of EBM training. Training courses, such as Training the Trainers, are now available to help trainers identify and make use of EBM training opportunities in clinical practice. On the other hand, peer-assisted learning and trainee-led support networks can strengthen self-directed learning of EBM and research participation among clinical scientists in training. Finally, we emphasise the need to evaluate any EBLP training programme using validated assessment tools to help identify the most crucial ingredients of effective EBLP training. In summary, we recommend on-the-job training of EBM with additional focus on overcoming barriers to its implementation. In addition, future studies evaluating the effectiveness of EBM training should use validated outcome tools, endeavour to achieve adequate power and consider the effects of EBM training on learning environment and patient outcomes. </p>","PeriodicalId":34924,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Biochemist Reviews","volume":"34 2","pages":"93-103"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3799223/pdf/cbr-34-93.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Biochemist Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Clinical scientists are at the unique interface between laboratory science and frontline clinical practice for supporting clinical partnerships for evidence-based practice. In an era of molecular diagnostics and personalised medicine, evidence-based laboratory practice (EBLP) is also crucial in aiding clinical scientists to keep up-to-date with this expanding knowledge base. However, there are recognised barriers to the implementation of EBLP and its training. The aim of this review is to provide a practical summary of potential strategies for training clinician-scientists of the next generation. Current evidence suggests that clinically integrated evidence-based medicine (EBM) training is effective. Tailored e-learning EBM packages and evidence-based journal clubs have been shown to improve knowledge and skills of EBM. Moreover, e-learning is no longer restricted to computer-assisted learning packages. For example, social media platforms such as Twitter have been used to complement existing journal clubs and provide additional post-publication appraisal information for journals. In addition, the delivery of an EBLP curriculum has influence on its success. Although e-learning of EBM skills is effective, having EBM trained teachers available locally promotes the implementation of EBM training. Training courses, such as Training the Trainers, are now available to help trainers identify and make use of EBM training opportunities in clinical practice. On the other hand, peer-assisted learning and trainee-led support networks can strengthen self-directed learning of EBM and research participation among clinical scientists in training. Finally, we emphasise the need to evaluate any EBLP training programme using validated assessment tools to help identify the most crucial ingredients of effective EBLP training. In summary, we recommend on-the-job training of EBM with additional focus on overcoming barriers to its implementation. In addition, future studies evaluating the effectiveness of EBM training should use validated outcome tools, endeavour to achieve adequate power and consider the effects of EBM training on learning environment and patient outcomes.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
为下一代临床科学家提供在职循证医学培训。
临床科学家是实验室科学与一线临床实践之间的独特纽带,可为循证实践的临床合作提供支持。在分子诊断和个性化医疗时代,循证实验室实践(EBLP)对于帮助临床科学家跟上不断扩大的知识库也至关重要。然而,在实施 EBLP 及其培训方面存在公认的障碍。本综述旨在对培训下一代临床科学家的潜在策略进行实用性总结。目前的证据表明,临床综合循证医学(EBM)培训是有效的。量身定制的循证医学电子学习包和循证期刊俱乐部已被证明能提高循证医学的知识和技能。此外,电子学习不再局限于计算机辅助学习软件包。例如,推特(Twitter)等社交媒体平台已被用于补充现有的期刊俱乐部,并为期刊提供额外的出版后评估信息。此外,EBLP 课程的实施对其成功与否也有影响。虽然电子学习 EBM 技能很有效,但在当地配备受过 EBM 培训的教师也能促进 EBM 培训的实施。现在有培训课程,如 "培训培训师",帮助培训师在临床实践中发现和利用 EBM 培训机会。另一方面,同侪辅助学习和受训者主导的支持网络可以加强受训临床科学家对 EBM 的自主学习和研究参与。最后,我们强调有必要使用经过验证的评估工具对任何 EBLP 培训计划进行评估,以帮助确定有效 EBLP 培训的最关键要素。总之,我们建议开展 EBM 在职培训,并将重点放在克服实施 EBM 的障碍上。此外,未来评估 EBM 培训效果的研究应使用经过验证的结果工具,努力达到足够的功率,并考虑 EBM 培训对学习环境和患者效果的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Biochemist Reviews
Clinical Biochemist Reviews Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-Clinical Biochemistry
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Digital Disruption in Healthcare and its Impact on Laboratory Services Standardisation of Dietary and Medication Restrictions for Urine 5-Hydroxyindoleacetic Acid (5-HIAA) Collection Diagnostic Evaluation of Renal Tubular Acidosis: A Clinical Biochemistry Perspective Digoxin: Review of Current Laboratory Practice and Considerations Proceedings of the Australasian Association of Clinical Biochemistry and Laboratory Medicine's 2021 Virtual Scientific Conference.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1